Research Article

Intensity as the Dominant Cue for Minimum Audible Angle in Young Adults

Abstract

Background and Aim: The Minimum Audible Angle (MAA), defined as the minimum perceivable angular disparity among sound sources, is the most frequently used measure of spatial acuity in psychophysics. While conventionally free-field loudspeaker arrangements measure MAA, virtual auditory methods offer flexible alternatives. The study aimed to determine which stimulus characteristic—intensity level, type, or duration—most influences MAA in normally hearing young adults.
Methods: Using a repeated-measures design with 30 healthy adults aged 18-30 years, spatialized stimuli generated by the 3D Tune-In Toolkit were presented over headphones at three levels (45-, 55-, and 65-dB SPL), durations (250, 500, and 1000 ms), and stimulus types (complex tone, pure tone, and white band noise). MAA thresholds were determined using a psychometric staircase procedure with a two-down one-up rule in a three-interval forced-choice task.
Results: Three-way repeated-measures ANOVA showed significant main effects of stimulus type and intensity level (p < 0.001), while duration had no significant effect but interacted with level and stimulus type (p < 0.001). Post hoc comparisons revealed eight significant stimulus-type pairs and nine level pairs after Bonferroni correction (α = 0.02), with complex tones and higher intensity producing lower MAA thresholds. Multiple regression showed only stimulus intensity significantly predicted MAA.
Conclusion: The findings demonstrate that higher intensities yield optimal spatial acuity and confirm the reliability of virtual headphone-based methods.

1. Perrott DR, Saberi K. Minimum audible angle thresholds for sources varying in both elevation and azimuth. J Acoust Soc Am. 1990;87(4):1728-31. [DOI:10.1121/1.399421]
2. Strybel TZ, Fujimoto K. Minimum audible angles in the horizontal and vertical planes: effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and burst duration. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000;108(6):3092-5. [DOI:10.1121/1.1323720]
3. Grantham DW, Hornsby BW, Erpenbeck EA. Auditory spatial resolution in horizontal, vertical, and diagonal planes. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003;114(2):1009-22. [DOI:10.1121/1.1590970]
4. Mills AW. On the Minimum Audible Angle. J Acoust Soc Am. 1958;30:237-46. [DOI:10.1121/1.1909553]
5. Alzaher M, Serrano P, Tardieu J, Barone P, Marx M, Nieto P. Contribution of a method of assessing minimum audible angle in headphones. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2021;138(5):333-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.anorl.2020.12.006]
6. Alzaher M, Valzolgher C, Verdelet G, Pavani F, Farnè A, Barone P, et al. Audiovisual Training in Virtual Reality Improves Auditory Spatial Adaptation in Unilateral Hearing Loss Patients. J Clin Med. 2023;12(6):2357. [DOI:10.3390/jcm12062357]
7. Rønne FM, Laugesen S, Jensen NS, Pedersen JH. Minimum Audible Angles Measured with Simulated Normally-Sized and Oversized Pinnas for Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Test Subjects. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;894:207-17. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-25474-6_22]
8. Kayser H, Ewert SD, Anemüller J, Rohdenburg T, Hohmann V, Kollmeier B. Database of multichannel in-ear and behind-the-ear head-related and binaural room impulse responses. EURASIP J Adv Signal Process. 2009;2009(1):298605. [DOI:10.1155/2009/29860]
9. Cuevas-Rodríguez M, Picinali L, González-Toledo D, Garre C, de la Rubia-Cuestas E, Molina-Tanco L, et al. 3D Tune-In Toolkit: An open-source library for real-time binaural spatialisation. PLoS One. 2019;14(3):e0211899. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0211899]
10. Meng R, Xiang J, Sang J, Zheng C, Li X, Bleeck S, et al. Investigation of an MAA Test With Virtual Sound Synthesis. Front Psychol. 2021;12:656052. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.656052]
11. Shub DE, Carr SP, Kong Y, Colburn HS. Discrimination and identification of azimuth using spectral shape. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008;124(5):3132-41. [DOI:10.1121/1.2981634]
12. Thavam S, Dietz M. Smallest perceivable interaural time differences. J Acoust Soc Am. 2019;145(1):458. [DOI:10.1121/1.5087566]
13. Smith RC, Price SR. Modelling of human low frequency sound localization acuity demonstrates dominance of spatial variation of interaural time difference and suggests uniform just-noticeable differences in interaural time difference. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e89033. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0089033]
14. Macpherson EA, Middlebrooks JC. Listener weighting of cues for lateral angle: the duplex theory of sound localization revisited. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002;111(5 Pt 1):2219-36. [DOI:10.1121/1.1471898]
15. Horvath D, Lesica NA. The effects of interaural time difference and intensity on the coding of low-frequency sounds in the mammalian midbrain. J Neurosci. 2011;31(10):3821-7. [DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4806-10.2011]
16. Leino S, May PJ, Alku P, Liikkanen LA, Tiitinen H. The contribution of high frequencies to human brain activity underlying horizontal localization of natural spatial sounds. BMC Neurosci. 2007;8:78. [DOI:10.1186/1471-2202-8-78]
17. Levitt H. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am. 1971;49(2):Suppl 2:467+. [DOI:10.1121/1.1912375]
18. Romigh GD, Brungart DS, Stern RM, Simpson BD. Efficient Real Spherical Harmonic Representation of Head-Related Transfer Functions. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. 2015;9(5):921-30. [DOI:10.1109/JSTSP.2015.2421876]
19. Liberman MC, Dodds LW. Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. III. Stereocilia damage and alterations of threshold tuning curves. Hear Res. 1984;16(1):55-74. [DOI:10.1016/0378-5955(84)90025-x]
20. Joris P, Yin TC. A matter of time: internal delays in binaural processing. Trends Neurosci. 2007;30(2):70-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.tins.2006.12.004]
21. Yin TCT, Smith PH, Joris PX. Neural Mechanisms of Binaural Processing in the Auditory Brainstem. Compr Physiol. 2019;9(4):1503-75. [DOI:10.1002/cphy.c180036]
22. Zwislocki J. Theory of Temporal Auditory Summation. J Acoust Soc Am. 1960;32(8):1046-60. [DOI:10.1121/1.1908276]
23. Planinec V, Planinec V, Reijniers J, Horvat M, Jambrošić K. The Accuracy of Dynamic Sound Source Localization and Recognition Ability of Individual Head-Related Transfer Functions in Binaural Audio Systems with Head Tracking. Appl Sci. 2023;13(9):5254. [DOI:10.3390/app13095254]
Files
IssueArticles in Press QRcode
SectionResearch Article(s)
Keywords
Minimum Audible Angle Spatial Hearing Virtual Acoustics Stimulus Complexity

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
A S A, Mali H, Venkateswaran N. Intensity as the Dominant Cue for Minimum Audible Angle in Young Adults. Aud Vestib Res. 2026;.