<?xml version="1.0"?>
<Articles JournalTitle="Auditory and Vestibular Research">
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tehran University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Auditory and Vestibular Research</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2423-480X</Issn>
      <Volume>0</Volume>
      <Issue>0</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2026</Year>
        <Month>05</Month>
        <Day>09</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <title locale="en_US">Intensity as the Dominant Cue for Minimum Audible Angle in Young Adults</title>
    <FirstPage>1525</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>1525</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Arunachalam</FirstName>
        <LastName>A S</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">All India Institute of Speech and Hearing(AIISH)</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Harshada</FirstName>
        <LastName>Mali</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">All India Institute of Speech and Hearing (AIISH)</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Nisha</FirstName>
        <LastName>Venkateswaran</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">All India Institute of Speech and Hearing (AIISH)</affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2025</Year>
        <Month>12</Month>
        <Day>15</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2026</Year>
        <Month>05</Month>
        <Day>09</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <abstract locale="en_US">Background and Aim: The Minimum Audible Angle (MAA), defined as the minimum perceivable angular disparity among sound sources, is the most frequently used measure of spatial acuity in psychophysics. While conventionally free-field loudspeaker arrangements measure MAA, virtual auditory methods offer flexible alternatives. The study aimed to determine which stimulus characteristic&#x2014;intensity level, type, or duration&#x2014;most influences MAA in normally hearing young adults.
Methods: Using a repeated-measures design with 30 healthy adults aged 18-30 years, spatialized stimuli generated by the 3D Tune-In Toolkit were presented over headphones at three levels (45-, 55-, and 65-dB SPL), durations (250, 500, and 1000 ms), and stimulus types (complex tone, pure tone, and white band noise). MAA thresholds were determined using a psychometric staircase procedure with a two-down one-up rule in a three-interval forced-choice task.
Results: Three-way repeated-measures ANOVA showed significant main effects of stimulus type and intensity level (p &lt; 0.001), while duration had no significant effect but interacted with level and stimulus type (p &lt; 0.001). Post hoc comparisons revealed eight significant stimulus-type pairs and nine level pairs after Bonferroni correction (&#x3B1; = 0.02), with complex tones and higher intensity producing lower MAA thresholds. Multiple regression showed only stimulus intensity significantly predicted MAA.
Conclusion: The findings demonstrate that higher intensities yield optimal spatial acuity and confirm the reliability of virtual headphone-based methods.</abstract>
    <web_url>https://avr.tums.ac.ir/index.php/avr/article/view/1525</web_url>
  </Article>
</Articles>
