Acceptable noise level in learning disordered children
AbstractBackground and Aim: Acceptable noise level (ANL) measures the amount of accepted background noise while listening to the story. In the current study, ANL was carried out in children with learning disability (LD) and compared with the results of normal children by using examiner- and self-adjusted methods.Methods: Forty seven (25 male, 22 female) normal children with good and better educational background and 46 (27 male, 19 female) LD children ranging in age from 7-12 years old were participated. ANL was assessed using an ear-level loudspeaker in front of children. The differences of ANL, most comfortable level (MCL), and background noise level (BNL) between groups and their relationship between examiner- and self-adjusted procedures were investigated.Results: Mean ANLs of LD children either in examiner- or self-adjusted methods (8.91±4.66 and 11.00±5.38, respectively) were worse than those of normal children (7.19±3.63 and 9.61±3.41, respectively). The difference between mean ANL of normal and LD children was statistically significant only for examiner-adjusted method (p=0.05). There were also significant differences in BNL between groups for examiner- and self-adjusted method (p<0.05). A strong positive correlation was found between examiner- and self-adjusted conditions for ANL, MCL, and BNL among groups (p<0.001).Conclusion: ANL is clinically applicable in LD children. Moreover, LD children accept lower background noise; therefore modification of their listening environment is recommended. Because of a strong positive relationship between ANL in examiner- and self-adjusted procedures, both methods can be implemented in different situations.
2. Calder Stegemann K. Learning disabilities in Canada. Learning Disabilities--A Contemporary Journal. 2016;14(1):53-62.
3. First MB, Tasman A. DSM-IV-TR mental disorders: diagnosis, etiology and treatment. 1st ed. Chichester: Wiley; 2004.
4. Nabelek AK, Pickett JM. Monaural and binaural speech perception through hearing aids under noise and reverberation with normal and hearing-impaired listeners. J Speech Hear Res. 1974;17(4):724-39. doi: 10.1044/jshr.1704.724
5. Chermak GD, Musiek FE. Central auditory processing disorders: new perspectives. 1st ed. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group, Inc; 1997.
6. Cunningham J, Nicol T, Zecker SG, Bradlow A, Kraus N. Neurobiologic responses to speech in noise in children with learning problems: deficits and strategies for improvement. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;112(5):758-67. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00465-5
7. Bradlow AR, Kraus N, Hayes E. Speaking clearly for children with learning disabilities: sentence perception in noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003;46(1):80-97. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/007)
8. Cortiella C, Horowitz SH. The state of learning disabilities: facts, trends and emerging issues. New York: National Center for Learning Disabilities; 2014. 2-45.
9. Nabelek AK, Tucker FM, Letowski TR. Toleration of background noises: relationship with patterns of hearing aid use by elderly persons. J Speech Hear Res. 1991;34(3):679-85. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3403.679
10. Freyaldenhoven MC, Smiley DF. Acceptance of background noise in children with normal hearing. J Educ Audiol. 2006;13:27-31.
11. Nabelek AK, Freyaldenhoven MC, Tampas JW, Burchfiel SB, Muenchen RA. Acceptable noise level as a predictor of hearing aid use. J Am Acad Audiol. 2006;17(9):626-39. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17.9.2
12. Harkrider AW, Tampas JW. Differences in responses from the cochleae and central nervous systems of females with low versus high acceptable noise levels. J Am Acad Audiol. 2006;17(9):667-76. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17.9.6
13. Warrier CM, Johnson KL, Hayes EA, Nicol T, Kraus N. Learning impaired children exhibit timing deficits and training-related improvements in auditory cortical responses to speech in noise. Exp Brain Res. 2004;157(4):431-41. doi: 10.1007/s00221-004-1857-6
14. Nagarajan S, Mahncke H, Salz T, Tallal P, Roberts T, Merzenich MM. Cortical auditory signal processing in poor readers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(11):6483-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.11.6483
15. King C, Warrier CM, Hayes E, Kraus N. Deficits in auditory brainstem pathway encoding of speech sounds in children with learning problems. Neurosci Lett. 2002;319(2):111-5. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(01)02556-3
16. Sheehan G, Houghton J, Searchfield GD. Acceptability of background noise amongst children diagnosed with an auditory processing disorder. Speech Lang Hear. 2016;19(3):180-8. doi: 10.1080/2050571X.2016.1182310
17. Iliadou V, Bamiou DE, Kaprinis S, Kandylis D, Kaprinis G. Auditory Processing Disorders in children suspected of Learning Disabilities--a need for screening? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;73(7):1029-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.04.004
18. Bellis TJ. Assessment and management of central auditory processing disorders in the educational setting from science to practice. 2nd ed. San Diego: Plural Publishing; 2011.
19. Petermann F, Petermann U. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children®–Fourth Edition. 2011.
20. Hosaini M, Moradi A, Kormi Nouri R, Hassani J, Parhoon H. [Reliability and validity of reading and dyslexia test (NEMA)]. Advances in Cognitive Science. 2016;18(1):22-34. Persian.
21. Mohammadesmaeil E, Hooman HA. [Adaptation and standardization of the IRAN KEY-MATH test of mathematics]. Journal of Exceptional Children. 2003;2(4):323-32. Persian.
22. Shokoohi-Yekta M, Parand A, Rezaie M. [Learning disabilities]. Tehran: Tabib; 2006. Persian.
23. ANSI A. S3. 21 (R2009), Methods for manual pure-tone threshold audiometry. New York: American National Standards Institute. 2004.
24. Ahmadi A, Fatahi J, Keshani A, Jalilvand H, Modarresi Y, Jalaie S. [Developing and evaluating the reliability of acceptable noise level test in Persian language]. J Rehab Med. 2015;4(2):109-17. Persian.
25. Taghavi SM, Geshani A, Rouhbakhsh N, Mardani SH. Acceptable noise level test: bases and theories. Aud and Vest Res. 2017;26(4):184-94.
26. King WM, Lombardino LJ, Crandell CC, Leonard CM. Comorbid auditory processing disorder in developmental dyslexia. Ear Hear. 2003;24(5):448-56. doi: 10.1097/01.AUD.0000090437.10978.1A
27. Ramus F. Developmental dyslexia: specific phonological deficit or general sensorimotor dysfunction? Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003;13(2):212-8. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4388(03)00035-7
28. Freyaldenhoven MC, Thelin JW, Plyler PN, Nabelek AK, Burchfield SB. Effect of stimulant medication on the acceptance of background noise in individuals with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Audiol. 2005;16(9):677-86.
Copyright and Conflict of Interest
All submitted manuscripts should be accompanied with a statement from the author, showing there is no conflict of interest regarding that article. A conflict of interest, here, is a situation in which a medical research scientist, has competing professional or personal interests that make it difficult to fulfill his duties fairly. A conflict of interest can exist even if no unethical or improper act results from it, and can create an appearance of impropriety that can undermine confidence in the person or profession.
The right is reserved for the journal to accept or reject the submitted article or incorporate any changes deemed necessary by the editorial board to make contributions harmonize the editorial standards of the journal.
Accepted papers become the permanent property of Auditory and Vestibular Research.
The act of submitting a manuscript to the journal carries with it the right to publish that paper and implies the transfer of the copyright from the author to the Publisher.