Auditory Processing Skills in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
Abstract
Background and Aim: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is neurological disease of the central nervous system. Central auditory nervous system can also be affected by MS. The present study aimed to evaluate monaural and binaural auditory processing in patients with MS.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 45 patients with MS and 45 normal peers as controls aged 25–45 years. They underwent a central auditory processing test battery including the Persian versions of Buffalo model questionnaire (BMQ), staggered spondee word (SSW) test, quick speech in noise test (QSIN), phonemic synthesis test (PST), and twopair dichotic digit test (DDT).
Results: The results of SSW test, QSIN test, PST, DDT and BMQ in the MS group were significantly different than in the control group (p≤0.001). The results showed the poor performance of patients compared to controls in some monaural and binaural auditory processing skills.
Conclusion: Central auditory processing disorder is common among patients with MS. The BMQ is a suitable screening tool for identifying affected people. Dichotic listening skills, phonemic processing and speech perception in noise are impaired in MS patients which can have significant impacts on their quality of life.
[2] Messina S, Patti F. Gray matters in multiple sclerosis: cognitive impairment and structural MRI. Mult Scler Int. 2014;2014:609694. [DOI:10.1155/2014/609694]
[3] Habibi M, Farahani S, Rouhbakhsh N, Zamiri Abdollahi F, Jalaie S. Dichotic listening processing in patients with multiple sclerosis. Aud Vestib Res. 2019;28(4): 221-7. [DOI:10.18502/avr.v28i4.1457]
[4] Penaloza Lopez YR, Orozco Pena XD, Perez Ruiz SJ. Multiple sclerosis: Left advantage for auditory laterality in dichotic tests of central auditory processing and relationship of psychoacoustic tests with the Multiple Sclerosis Disability Scale-EDSS. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed). 2018;69(6):325-30. [DOI:10.1016/j.otorri.2017.11.003]
[5] Geffner D. Central auditory processing disorders: definition, description, and behaviors. In: Geffner D, Ross-Swain D, editors. Auditory processing disorders: assessment, management and treatment. 2nd ed. San Diego: Plural Publishing Inc.; 2013. p. 59-90.
[6] Lewis MS, Lilly DJ, Hutter M, Bourdette DN, Saunders J, Fausti SA. Some effects of multiple sclerosis on speech perception in noise: Preliminary findings. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006;43(1):91-8. [DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2004.09.0113]
[7] Tillery KL. Central auditory processing evaluation: a test battery approach. In: Katz J, Chasin M, English K, Hood LJ, Tillery KA, editors. Handbook of clinical audiology. 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2015. p. 545-60.
[8] Katz, J., APD evaluation to therapy: The buffalo model. Available in: http://www. audiology online. com/articles/apd-evaluation-to-therapy-buffalo-945, 2007.
[9] Negin E, Barootian SS. [Central auditory processing assessments; Buffalo model of auditory processing]. 1st ed. Tehran: Setayeshe Hasti Pub.; 2018. Persian.
[10] Khamisabadi S, Ahadi M, Jalaie S, Jarollahi F, Ahmadi Z. Validity and reliability of the Persian version of buffalo model questionnaire (P-BMQ) among 7 to 12 years old normal children. Function and Disability Journal. 2019; 2(1):71-7.
[11] Negin E, Jarollahi F, Barootiyan SS, Seyyedi F, Jalaie S, Katz J. Development, validity, reliability and normative data of the Persian Phonemic Synthesis Test (P-PST). Int J Audiol. 2020;59(3):230-235. [DOI:10.1080/14992027.2019.1688401]
[12] Arbab H, Moossavi A, Javanbakht M, Arbab Sarjoo H, Bakhshi E, Mahmoodi Bakhtiari B, et al. Development and psychometric evaluation of Persian version of the quick speech in noise test in Persian speaking 18-25 years old normal adults. Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences & Research, 2016. 3(3):51-6. [DOI:10.30476/JRSR.2016.41099]
[13] Strouse, A. and R.H. Wilson, Stimulus length uncertainty with dichotic digit recognition. J Am Acad Audiol. 1999;10(4):219-29.
[14] Iliadou VV, Ptok M, Grech H, Pedersen ER, Brechmann A, Deggouj N, et al., A European perspective on auditory processing disorder-current knowledge and future research focus. Front Neurol. 2017;8:622. [DOI:10.3389/fneur.2017.00622]
[15] Moore DR, Hugdahl K, Stewart HJ, Vannest J, Perdew AJ, Sloat NT, et al. Listening difficulties in children: Behavior and brain activation produced by dichotic listening of CV syllables. Front Psychol. 2020;11:675. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00675]
[16] Rezapour M, Zamiri Abdollahi F, Delphi M, Lotfi Y, Bakhshi E. Normalization and reliability evaluation of Persian version of two-pair dichotic digits in 8 to 12-year-old children. Iran Rehabil J. 2016;14(2):115-20. [DOI:10.18869/nrip.irj.14.2.115]
[17] Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971;9(1):97-113. [DOI:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4]
[18] Katz J. Buffalo model questionnaire: Follow up. SSW Reports. 2006. 28:1-4.
[19] Katz J, Marascuilo D. Sensitivity of the central test battery-CD. SSW Reports. 2001. 23:1-6.
[20] Wilson RH, McArdle RA, Smith SL. An evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, Quick SIN, and WIN materials on listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007;50(4):844-56. [DOI:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/059)]
[21] Pavlick ML, Zalewski TR, González JE, Duncan MKW. A (c) APD screening instrument for the buffalo model diagnostic test battery. J Edu Audiol. 2010. 16:4-13.
[22] Kaul K, Lucker JR. Auditory Processing Training with Children Diagnosed with Auditory Processing Disorders: Therapy Based on the Buffalo Model. Journal of Educational, Pediatric & (Re) Habilitative Audiology. 2016. 22:1-10.
[23] Lewis MS, Wilmington D, Hutter M, McMillan G, Casiana L, Fitzpatrick M, et al. Preliminary identification of central auditory processing screening tests for individuals with multiple sclerosis. Semin Hear. 2012; 33(3):261-73. [DOI:10.1055/s-0032-1315725]
[24] El-Zarea GA, Shalaby AA, Hussin HM, Ali MS. Evaluation of central auditory processing in Egyptian multiple sclerosis patients. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 2018;71(7):3667-75. https://ejhm.journals.ekb.eg/article_8479.
[25] Gadea M, Marti-Bonmatí L, Arana E, Espert R, Casanova V, Pascual A. Dichotic listening and corpus callosum magnetic resonance imaging in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis with emphasis on sex differences. Neuropsychology. 2002;16(2):275-81. [DOI:10.1037/0894-4105.16.2.275]
[26] Berlow YA, Pollaro J, Krisky C, Grinstead J, Snodgrass M, Kohout K, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging correlates of dichotic listening performance in multiple sclerosis. Semin Hear. 2012; 33(3):283-94. [DOI:10.1055/s-0032-1315727]
[27] Rubens AB, Froehling B, Slater G, Anderson D. Left ear suppression on verbal dichotic tests in patients with multiple sclerosis. Annals of Neurology: Ann Neurol. 1985;18(4):459-63. [DOI:10.1002/ana.410180408]
Files | ||
Issue | Vol 31 No 2 (2022) | |
Section | Research Article(s) | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/avr.v31i2.9116 | |
Keywords | ||
Auditory processing multiple sclerosis central auditory nervous system adults speech perception |
Rights and permissions | |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |