Research Article

Parent’s and teacher’s evaluation of aural oral performance of children with hearing aids

Abstract

Background and Aim: Parents' evaluation of aural/oral performance of children (PEACH) and teachers' evaluation of aural/oral performance of children (TEACH) questionnaires are used to assess the behaviors of hearing-impaired children in real-life situations. This study aims to compare the scores of PEACH and TEACH in children with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) using hearing aids.
Methods: This is a double-blind two-period crossover study on 21 children aged 9-72 months with severe-to-profound SNHL using hearing aids. There were two 6-week periods of fitting Phonak Naida Venture SP hearing aids using the fifth version of the Desired Sensation Level (DSL v5) and the National Acoustics Laboratories’ nonlinear fitting procedure (NAL-NL2) prescriptions. At the end of each trial, the PEACH and TEACH questioners were completed through an interview with the parents and teachers, respectively.
Results: There was a strong correlation between the PEACH and TEACH in total and subscale scores. There was no significant difference between the results of DSL v5 and the NAL-NL2 prescriptions for the total score and subscale scores of PEACH and TEACH.
Conclusion: The PEACH score has a strong correlation with the TEACH score. These questionnaires are useful tools for indirectly assessment of hearing-impaired children’s communication skills. The DSL v5 and the NAL-NL2 prescriptions make no significant difference in the performance of children with severe-to-profound SNHL.

1. Nelson HD, Bougatsos C, Nygren P; 2001 US Preventive Services Task Force. Universal newborn hearing screening: systematic review to update the 2001 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation. Pediatrics. 2008;122(1):e266-76. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1422
2. King AM. The national protocol for paediatric amplification in Australia. Int J Audiol. 2010;49 Suppl 1:S64-9. doi: 10.3109/14992020903329422
3. Scollie S, Seewald R, Cornelisse L, Moodie S, Bagatto M, Laurnagaray D, et al. The desired sensation level multistage input/output algorithm. Trends Amplif. 2005;9(4):159-97. doi: 10.1177/108471380500900403
4. Dillon H, Keidser G, Ching TY, Flax M, Brewer S. The NAL-NL2 prescription procedure. Phonak Focus. 2011;40:1-0.
5. Ching TYC, Dillon H, Hou S, Zhang V, Day J, Crowe K, et al. A randomized controlled comparison of NAL and DSL prescriptions for young children: hearing-aid characteristics and performance outcomes at three years of age. Int J Audiol. 2013;52 Suppl 2(0 2):S17-28. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2012.705903
6. Ching TYC, Johnson EE, Hou S, Dillon H, Zhang V, Burns L, et al. A comparison of NAL and DSL prescriptive methods for paediatric hearing-aid fitting: predicted speech intelligibility and loudness. Int J Audiol. 2013;52 Suppl 2(0 2):S29-38. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.765041
7. Ching TYC. Selecting, verifying, and evaluating hearing aids for children. Audiol Med. 2003;1(3):191-8. doi: 10.1080/16513860310001988
8. Zamiri Abdollahi F, Delphi M, Delphi V. The correlation analysis between the spatial hearing questionnaire (SHQ) and the psychophysical measurement of spatial hearing. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;71(Suppl 2):1658-62. doi: 10.1007/s12070-019-01674-2
9. Emerson LP. Pilot study to evaluate children with hearing aids through PEACH and TEACH in a rural community. Egyptian Journal of Ear, Nose, Throat and Allied Sciences. 2015;16(2):133-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejenta.2015.02.003
10. Ching TY, Hill M. The parents' evaluation of aural/oral performance of children (PEACH) scale: normative data. J Am Acad Audiol. 2007;18(3):220-35. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.18.3.4
11. Ching TYC, Hill M, Dillon H. Effect of variations in hearing-aid frequency response on real-life functional performance of children with severe or profound hearing loss. Int J Audiol. 2008;47(8):461-75. doi: 10.1080/14992020802116128
12. Golding M, Pearce W, Seymour J, Cooper A, Ching T, Dillon H. The relationship between obligatory cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) and functional measures in young infants. J Am Acad Audiol. 2007;18(2):117-25. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.18.2.4
13. Naghibirad F, Fatahi J, Hajiabolhassan F, Faghihzadeh E, Emamdjomeh H. Cultural adaptation and determination of validity and reliability of the Persian version of the parents' evaluation of aural/oral performance of children questionnaire. Aud Vestib Res. 2016;25(2):1118.
14. Fatahi F, Hajisadeghian N, Hajiabolhassan F, Zamiri Abdollahi F, Jalaie S. Development of Persian version of teachers’ evaluation of aural/oral performance of children scale. Aud Vestib Res.2020;29(2):64-75. doi: 10.18502/avr.v29i2.2787
15. Quar TK, Ching TYC, Newall P, Sharma M. Evaluation of real-world preferences and performance of hearing aids fitted according to the NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 procedures in children with moderately severe to profound hearing loss. Int J Audiol. 2013;52(5):322-32. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2012.755740
16. Ching TYC, Quar TK, Johnson EE, Newall P, Sharma M. Comparing NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 in hearing aids fit to children with severe or profound hearing loss: goodness of fit-to-targets, impacts on predicted loudness and speech intelligibility. J Am Acad Audiol. 2015;26(3):260-74. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.26.3.6
17. Scollie S, Ching TYC, Seewald R, Dillon H, Britton L, Steinberg J, et al. Evaluation of the NAL-NL1 and DSL v4. 1 prescriptions for children: Preference in real world use. Int J Audiol. 2010;49 Suppl 1:S49-63. doi: 10.3109/14992020903148038
Files
IssueIssue in progress QRcode
SectionResearch Article(s)
Keywords
Aural oral performance questionnaire children parents hearing loss functional performance

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Zarrinpour F, Rahbar N, Sameni SJ. Parent’s and teacher’s evaluation of aural oral performance of children with hearing aids. Aud Vestib Res. 2021;:280-286.