Research Article

Parent’s and teacher’s evaluation of aural oral performance of children with hearing aids


Background and Aim: Parents' evaluation of aural/oral performance of children (PEACH) and teachers' evaluation of aural/oral performance of children (TEACH) questionnaires are used to assess the behaviors of hearing-impaired children in real-life situations. This study aims to compare the scores of PEACH and TEACH in children with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) using hearing aids.
Methods: This is a double-blind two-period crossover study on 21 children aged 9-72 months with severe-to-profound SNHL using hearing aids. There were two 6-week periods of fitting Phonak Naida Venture SP hearing aids using the fifth version of the Desired Sensation Level (DSL v5) and the National Acoustics Laboratories’ nonlinear fitting procedure (NAL-NL2) prescriptions. At the end of each trial, the PEACH and TEACH questioners were completed through an interview with the parents and teachers, respectively.
Results: There was a strong correlation between the PEACH and TEACH in total and subscale scores. There was no significant difference between the results of DSL v5 and the NAL-NL2 prescriptions for the total score and subscale scores of PEACH and TEACH.
Conclusion: The PEACH score has a strong correlation with the TEACH score. These questionnaires are useful tools for indirectly assessment of hearing-impaired children’s communication skills. The DSL v5 and the NAL-NL2 prescriptions make no significant difference in the performance of children with severe-to-profound SNHL.

1. Nelson HD, Bougatsos C, Nygren P; 2001 US Preventive Services Task Force. Universal newborn hearing screening: systematic review to update the 2001 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation. Pediatrics. 2008;122(1):e266-76. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1422
2. King AM. The national protocol for paediatric amplification in Australia. Int J Audiol. 2010;49 Suppl 1:S64-9. doi: 10.3109/14992020903329422
3. Scollie S, Seewald R, Cornelisse L, Moodie S, Bagatto M, Laurnagaray D, et al. The desired sensation level multistage input/output algorithm. Trends Amplif. 2005;9(4):159-97. doi: 10.1177/108471380500900403
4. Dillon H, Keidser G, Ching TY, Flax M, Brewer S. The NAL-NL2 prescription procedure. Phonak Focus. 2011;40:1-0.
5. Ching TYC, Dillon H, Hou S, Zhang V, Day J, Crowe K, et al. A randomized controlled comparison of NAL and DSL prescriptions for young children: hearing-aid characteristics and performance outcomes at three years of age. Int J Audiol. 2013;52 Suppl 2(0 2):S17-28. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2012.705903
6. Ching TYC, Johnson EE, Hou S, Dillon H, Zhang V, Burns L, et al. A comparison of NAL and DSL prescriptive methods for paediatric hearing-aid fitting: predicted speech intelligibility and loudness. Int J Audiol. 2013;52 Suppl 2(0 2):S29-38. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.765041
7. Ching TYC. Selecting, verifying, and evaluating hearing aids for children. Audiol Med. 2003;1(3):191-8. doi: 10.1080/16513860310001988
8. Zamiri Abdollahi F, Delphi M, Delphi V. The correlation analysis between the spatial hearing questionnaire (SHQ) and the psychophysical measurement of spatial hearing. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;71(Suppl 2):1658-62. doi: 10.1007/s12070-019-01674-2
9. Emerson LP. Pilot study to evaluate children with hearing aids through PEACH and TEACH in a rural community. Egyptian Journal of Ear, Nose, Throat and Allied Sciences. 2015;16(2):133-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejenta.2015.02.003
10. Ching TY, Hill M. The parents' evaluation of aural/oral performance of children (PEACH) scale: normative data. J Am Acad Audiol. 2007;18(3):220-35. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.18.3.4
11. Ching TYC, Hill M, Dillon H. Effect of variations in hearing-aid frequency response on real-life functional performance of children with severe or profound hearing loss. Int J Audiol. 2008;47(8):461-75. doi: 10.1080/14992020802116128
12. Golding M, Pearce W, Seymour J, Cooper A, Ching T, Dillon H. The relationship between obligatory cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) and functional measures in young infants. J Am Acad Audiol. 2007;18(2):117-25. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.18.2.4
13. Naghibirad F, Fatahi J, Hajiabolhassan F, Faghihzadeh E, Emamdjomeh H. Cultural adaptation and determination of validity and reliability of the Persian version of the parents' evaluation of aural/oral performance of children questionnaire. Aud Vestib Res. 2016;25(2):1118.
14. Fatahi F, Hajisadeghian N, Hajiabolhassan F, Zamiri Abdollahi F, Jalaie S. Development of Persian version of teachers’ evaluation of aural/oral performance of children scale. Aud Vestib Res.2020;29(2):64-75. doi: 10.18502/avr.v29i2.2787
15. Quar TK, Ching TYC, Newall P, Sharma M. Evaluation of real-world preferences and performance of hearing aids fitted according to the NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 procedures in children with moderately severe to profound hearing loss. Int J Audiol. 2013;52(5):322-32. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2012.755740
16. Ching TYC, Quar TK, Johnson EE, Newall P, Sharma M. Comparing NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 in hearing aids fit to children with severe or profound hearing loss: goodness of fit-to-targets, impacts on predicted loudness and speech intelligibility. J Am Acad Audiol. 2015;26(3):260-74. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.26.3.6
17. Scollie S, Ching TYC, Seewald R, Dillon H, Britton L, Steinberg J, et al. Evaluation of the NAL-NL1 and DSL v4. 1 prescriptions for children: Preference in real world use. Int J Audiol. 2010;49 Suppl 1:S49-63. doi: 10.3109/14992020903148038
IssueVol 30 No 4 (2021) QRcode
SectionResearch Article(s)
Aural oral performance questionnaire children parents hearing loss functional performance

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Zarrinpour F, Rahbar N, Sameni SJ. Parent’s and teacher’s evaluation of aural oral performance of children with hearing aids. Aud Vestib Res. 2021;30(4):280-286.