Research Article

The effects of noise exposure and work-related fatigue on the acceptable noise level test in normal-hearing people

Abstract

Background and Aim: The acceptable noise level (ANL) assesses the noise that a person can tolerate during a running speech. Although it is a strong test, it has not yet become popular in clinical practice. One of the reasons is its contradictory results. Since it is a psychoacoustic test, psychological factors can affect its output. Investigation of these factors can provide more accurate results. This study aims to investigate the effects of noise and work-related fatigue on the ANL in normal-hearing people.
Methods: Participants were the male workers in the administration (n = 26) and production (n = 26) departments of an automotive manufacturing industry in Iran. They were evaluated before and after leaving the workplace in order to determine the effects of noise exposure, fatigue as well as their simultaneous effects on the ANL.
Results: In both groups, the ANL showed a significant increase after work compared to its level before work, and the background noise level (BNL) was significantly decreased. There was no significant difference in the BNL between administration and production groups before work. The most comfortable level (MCL) showed no significant increase. Moreover, the MCL changes were not significantly different in the production group compared to administration group, but the BNL and ANL changes were significantly higher.
Conclusion: Noise exposure and work-related fatigue affect the ANL. During the ANL test, earlier exposure to noise and the amount of fatigue should be controlled.

1. Nabelek AK. Acceptance of background noise may be key to successful fittings. Hear J. 2005;58(4):10-15. doi: 10.1097/01.HJ.0000286602.38611.56
2. Nabelek AK, Freyaldenhoven MC, Tampas JW, Burchfield SB, Muenchen RA. Acceptable noise level as a predictor of hearing aid use. J Am Acad Audiol. 2006;17(9):626-39. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17.9.2
3. Ahmadi A, Fatahi J, Keshani A, Jalilvand H, Modarresi Y, Jalaie S. Developing and evaluating the reliability of acceptable noise level test in Persian language. J Rehab Med. 2015;4(2):109-17. Persian. doi: 10.22037/JRM.2015.1100032
4. Olsen SØ, Lantz J, Nielsen LH, Brännström KJ. Acceptable noise level (ANL) with Danish and non-semantic speech materials in adult hearing-aid users. Int J Audiol. 2012;51(9):678-88. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2012.692822
5. Olsen SØ, Nielsen LH, Lantz J, Brännström KJ. Acceptable noise level: repeatability with Danish and non-semantic speech materials for adults with normal hearing. Int J Audiol. 2012;51(7):557-63. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2012.666362
6. Brännström KJ, Holm L, Kastberg T, Olsen SØ. The acceptable noise level: the effect of repeated measurements. Int J Audiol. 2014;53(1):21-9. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.824116
7. Freyaldenhoven MC, Smiley DF, Muenchen RA, Konrad TN. Acceptable noise level: reliability measures and comparison to preference for background sounds. J Am Acad Audiol. 2006;17(9):640-8. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17.9.3
8. Brännström KJ, Zunic E, Borovac A, Ibertsson T. Acceptance of background noise, working memory capacity, and auditory evoked potentials in subjects with normal hearing. J Am Acad Audiol. 2012;23(7):542-52. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.23.7.6
9. Nichols AC, Gordon-Hickey S. The relationship of locus of control, self-control, and acceptable noise levels for young listeners with normal hearing. Int J Audiol. 2012;51(4):353-9. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.645074
10. Basner M, Babisch W, Davis A, Brink M, Clark C, Janssen S, et al. Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health. Lancet. 2014;383(9925):1325-32. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61613-X
11. Maxwell LE, Evans GW. The effects of noise on pre-school children's pre-reading skills. J Environ Psychol. 2000;20(1):91-7. 10.1006/jevp.1999.0144
12. Frenzilli G, Ryskalin L, Ferrucci M, Cantafora E, Chelazzi S, Giorgi FS, et al. Loud noise exposure produces DNA, neurotransmitter and morphological damage within specific brain areas. Front Neuroanat. 2017;11:49. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2017.00049
13. Kujala T, Brattico E. Detrimental noise effects on brain's speech functions. Biol Psychol. 2009;81(3):135-43. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.03.010
14. Roeser RJ, Clark JL. Pure-tone tests. In: Roeser RJ, Valente M, Hosford-Dunn H, editors. Audiology diagnosis. 2nd ed. New York: Thieme; 2007. p. 238-60.
15. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971;9(1):97-113. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
16. Clark JL, Roeser RJ, Mendrygal M. Middle ear measures. In: Roeser RJ, Valente M, Hosford-Dunn H, editors. Audiology diagnosis. 2nd ed. New York: Thieme; 2007. p. 380-99.
17. Smets EM, Garssen B, Bonke B, De Haes JC. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue. J Psychosom Res. 1995;39(3):315-25. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(94)00125-o
18. Najafi Mehri S, Pashandi S, Mahmoodi H, Ebadi A, Ghanei M. [Assessment of fatigue and spirometery parameters in chemical war victims with respiratory disease]. Iranian Journal of War & Public Health. 2010;2(4):29-35. Persian.
19. Pallant J. SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. 7th ed. London: Routledge; 2020.
20. Brännström KJ, Olsen SØ, Holm L, Kastberg T, Ibertsson T. The effect of repeated measurements and working memory on the most comfortable level in the ANL test. Int J Audiol. 2014;53(11):787-95. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2014.938781
21. Hahad O, Prochaska JH, Daiber A, Muenzel T. Environmental noise-induced effects on stress hormones, oxidative stress, and vascular dysfunction: key factors in the relationship between cerebrocardiovascular and psychological disorders. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2019;2019:4623109. doi: 10.1155/2019/4623109
22. Ryherd EE, Waye KP, Ljungkvist L. Characterizing noise and perceived work environment in a neurological intensive care unit. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008;123(2):747-56. doi: 10.1121/1.2822661
23. Kristiansen J, Lund SP, Persson R, Shibuya H, Nielsen PM, Scholz M. A study of classroom acoustics and school teachers’ noise exposure, voice load and speaking time during teaching, and the effects on vocal and mental fatigue development. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2014;87(8):851-60. doi: 10.1007/s00420-014-0927-8
Files
IssueVol 30 No 2 (2021) QRcode
SectionResearch Article(s)
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/avr.v30i2.6093
Keywords
Exposure to noise fatigue acceptable noise level
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Heidari N, Geshani A, Rouhbakhsh N, Faghihzadeh E, Alishahi M. The effects of noise exposure and work-related fatigue on the acceptable noise level test in normal-hearing people. Aud Vestib Res. 2021;30(2):95-101.