Development of Persian version of teachers’ evaluation of aural/oral performance of children scale

  • Farzaneh Fatahi ORCID Mail Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Narjes Hajisadeghian Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Fahimeh Hajiabolhassan ORCID Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Farzaneh Zamiri Abdollahi ORCID Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Shohreh Jalaie ORCID School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Keywords:
Evaluation of aural/oral performance of children; hearing impairment; parents' evaluation of aural/oral performance of children; reliability; teachers; validity

Abstract

Background and Aim: Teachers’ evaluation of aural/oral performance of children (TEACH) scale is one of the scales used for assessing hearing-impaired children’s behaviors in real-life environments, regardless of the degree of hearing loss. The aim of the present study was development, determining validity and reliabi­lity of the Persian TEACH (P-TEACH) in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children.
Methods: The TEACH scale was translated and cross-culturally adapted. After verifying the face validity of the scale, P-TEACH was performed on 40 normal-hearing and 42 hearing-impaired and its’ results were compared with the Persian parents' evaluation of aural/oral performance of children (P-PEACH). The test-retest reliability of P-TEACH was evaluated after two weeks on 10 subjects who were selected randomly.
Results: Content validity index for item 3 was 0.8 and for others were 1. P-TEACH scores showed a significant difference between two groups (p < 0.001). There was a strong correlation between P-TEACH and P-PEACH scores (r = 0.59 to 0.87; p < 0.05). Cronbach's α for P-TEACH was 0.75 -0.98 for both groups. There was a significant correlation between children’s age and total score of P-TEACH in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children (r = 0.40 and 0.41 respectively; p ≤ 0.001). There was a significant correlation between test and retest of P-TEACH (r = 0.87 to 0.97; < 0.001).
Conclusion: P-TEACH is a well-adapted valid and reliable tool for functional evaluation of the auditory performance of hearing-impaired children. The study showed that the P-TEACH has a strong agreement with the P-PEACH.

References

1. Paludetti G, Conti G, DI Nardo W, DE Corso E, Rolesi R, Picciotti PM, et al. Infant hearing loss: from diagnosis to therapy Official Report of XXI Conference of Italian Society of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2012;32(6):347-70.
2. Stadio AD, Molini E, Gambacorta V, Giommetti G, Volpe AD, Ralli M, et al. Sensorineural hearing loss in newborns hospitalized in neonatal intensive care unit: an observational study. Int Tinnitus J. 2019;23(1):31-6. doi: 10.5935/0946-5448.20190006
3. Pourarian S, Khademi B, Pishva N, Jamali A. Prevalence of hearing loss in newborns admitted to neonatal intensive care unit. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;24(68):129-34. doi: 10.22038/IJORL.2012.185
4. Bass JK, Knight KR, Yock TI, Chang KW, Cipkala D, Grewal SS. Evaluation and management of hearing loss in survivors of childhood and adolescent cancers: a report from the children's oncology group. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016;63(7):1152-62. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25951
5. Moeller MP. Early intervention and language development in children who are deaf and hard of hearing. Pediatrics. 2000;106(3):E43. doi: 10.1542/peds.106.3.e43
6. Monshizadeh L, Vameghi R, Sajedi F, Yadegari F, Hashemi SB, Kirchem P, et al. Comparison of social interaction between cochlear-implanted children with normal intelligence undergoing auditory verbal therapy and normal-hearing children: a pilot study. J Int Adv Otol. 2018;14(1):34-8. doi: 10.5152/iao.2018.3663
7. Haghshenas M, Zadeh P, Javadian Y, Fard H, Delavari K, Panjaki H, et al. Auditory screening in infants for early detection of permanent hearing loss in northern Iran. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014;4(3):340-4. doi: 10.4103/2141-9248.133456
8. Northern JL, Downs MP. Hearing in children. 6th ed. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing, Inc; 2014.
9. McCreery RW, Kaminski J, Beauchaine K, Lenzen N, Simms K, Gorga MP. The impact of degree of hearing loss on auditory brainstem response predictions of behavioral thresholds. Ear Hear. 2015;36(3):309-19. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000120
10. Rohit H, Barman A. Cortical evioked potential in children using speech and non speech stimuli. In Savithri SR, editor. Student Research at AIISH. Mysore. Volume VIII: Part A. Mysore: All India Institute of Speech and Hearing; 2009. p. 199-209.
11. Lin HC, Chou YC, Wang CH, Hung LW, Shih CP, Kang BH, et al. Correlation between auditory brainstem response and hearing prognosis in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss patients. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2017;44(6):678-84. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2017.01.004
12. Wang XY, Luo RZ, Lan J, Wen RJ, Zou Y, Zhou JL. [Correlation between chirp auditory brainstem response and behavioral hearing threshold in children]. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009;44(3):188-91. Chinese.
13. Carlson ML, Sladen DP, Gurgel RK, Tombers NM, Lohse CM, Driscoll CL. Survey of the American Neurotology Society on cochlear implantation: part 1, candidacy assessment and expanding indications. Otol Neurotol. 2018;39(1):e12-e9. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001632
14. Sampaio AL, Araújo MF, Oliveira CA. New criteria of indication and selection of patients to cochlear implant. Int J Otolaryngol. 2011;2011:573968. doi: 10.1155/2011/573968
15. Zamiri Abdollahi F, Delphi M, Delphi V. The corre¬lation analysis between the spatial hearing questionnaire (SHQ) and the psychophysical measurement of spatial hearing. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;71(Suppl 2):1658-62. doi: 10.1007/s12070-019-01674-2
16. Lotfi Y, Nazeri AR, Asgari A, Moosavi A, Bakhshi E. Iranian version of speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale: a psychometric study. Acta Med Iran. 2016;54(12):756-64.
17. Obuchi C, Kaga K. Development of a questionnaire to assess listening difficulties in adults with auditory processing disorder. Hearing Balance Commun. 2020;18(1): 29-35. doi: 10.1080/21695717.2019.1663055
18. Bagatto MP, Scollie SD. Validation of the parents' evaluation of aural/oral performance of children (PEACH) rating scale. J Am Acad Audiol. 2013;24(2):121-5. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.24.2.5
19. Ching TY, Hill M. The Parents' Evaluation of Aural/Oral Performance of Children (PEACH) scale: normative data. J Am Acad Audiol. 2007;18(3):220-35. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.18.3.4
20. Darouie A, Joulaie M, Zamiri Abdollahi F, McConkey Robbins A, Zarepour S, Ahmadi T. Developing the Persian version of infant-toddler meaningful auditory integration scale. Iranian Rehabilitation Journal. 2019;17(1):53-60. doi: 10.32598/irj.17.1.53
21. McConkey Robbins A, Koch DB, Osberger MJ, Zimmerman-Phillips S, Kishon-Rabin L. Effect of age at cochlear implantation on auditory skill development in infants and toddlers. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(5):570-4. doi: 10.1001/archotol.130.5.570
22. Naghibirad F, Fatahi J, Hajiabolhassan F, Faghihzadeh E, Emamdjomeh H. Cultural adaptation and determination of validity and reliability of the Persian version of the parents’ evaluation of aural/oral performance of children questionnaire. Aud Vestib Res. 2016;25(2):111-8.
23. Golding M, Pearce W, Seymour J, Cooper A, Ching T, Dillon H. The relationship between obligatory cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) and functional measures in young infants. J Am Acad Audiol. 2007;18(2):117-25. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.18.2.4
24. Punch S, Van Dun B, King A, Carter L, Pearce W. Clinical experience of using cortical auditory evoked potentials in the treatment of infant hearing loss in Australia. Semin Hear. 2016;37(1):36-52. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1570331
25. Ching TY, Dillon H, Marnane V, Hou S, Day J, Seeto M, et al. Outcomes of early- and late-identified children at 3 years of age: findings from a prospective population-based study. Ear Hear. 2013;34(5):535-52. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182857718
26. Aaronson NK, Acquadro C, Alonso J, Apolone G, Bucquet D, Bullinger M, et al. International quality of life assessment (IQOLA) project. Qual Life Res. 1992;1(5):349-51. doi: 10.1007/bf00434949
27. Emerson LP. Pilot study to evaluate children with hearing aids through PEACH and TEACH in a rural community. Egyptian Journal of Ear, Nose, Throat and Allied Sciences. 2015;16(2):133-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejenta.2015.02.003
28. Quar TK, Ching TY, Mukari SZ, Newall P. Parents' evaluation of aural/oral performance of children (PEACH) scale in the Malay language: data for normal-hearing children. Int J Audiol. 2012;51(4):326-33. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.637079
Published
2020-04-14
How to Cite
1.
Fatahi F, Hajisadeghian N, Hajiabolhassan F, Zamiri Abdollahi F, Jalaie S. Development of Persian version of teachers’ evaluation of aural/oral performance of children scale. Aud Vestib Res. 29(2):64-75.
Section
Research Article(s)