Clinical evaluation of a new electrocochleography recording electrode

  • Mostafa Eyvazi Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Akram Pourbakht ORCID Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Seyyed Jalal Sameni ORCID Mail Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Mohammad Kamali ORCID Rehabilitation Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran AND Department of Basic Sciences, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Keywords:
Electrocochleography; Meniere's disease; gutter electrode; TIP-trode; impedance

Abstract

Background and Aim: Electrocochleography is one of the most practically used tests in approaching Meniere's disease (MD). To record reliable response components, the type of applied electrode is of particular importance. The TIP-trode is an appropriate electrode due to its user-friendliness. Gutter electrode can be used in more than 100 subject. This study aimed to compare the results of the Electrocochleography (ECochG) test responses using TIP-trode and the Gutter electrode.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on 20 normal subjects and 20 patients with MD, who referred to the Audiology Clinic of Iran University of Medical Sciences. The ECochG response components were randomly recorded with TIP-trode and Gutter-electrode consecutively, and then statistical analysis was accomplished.
Results: The mean impedance, action potential, and summation potential amplitudes were not significantly different between normal subjects and people with MD by using two types of electrodes. Moreover, the mean scores of summation potential/action potential (SP/AP) ratio of the Gutter electrode were higher than that of the TIP-trod. The mean SP/AP ratio between two types of electrodes was statistically significant differences in normal subjects (p = 0.027) and in MD group (p = 0.009).
Conclusion: We demonstrated that the utilization of the Gutter electrode in ECochG assessments was considerably effective and beneficial. It can significantly reduce expenses and be applied in clinical settings. It’s also recommended that 47.22% mean SP/AP amplitude ratio to be considered as upper limit of normality by using the Gutter electrode.

References

1. Gibson WP. The clinical uses of electrocochleography. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:274. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00274
2. Ferraro JA, Kileny PR, Grasel SS. Electrocochleography: new uses for an old test and normative values. Am J Audiol. 2019;28(3S):783-95. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJA-HEAL18-18-0190
3. Wever EG, Bray CW. Action currents in the auditory nerve in response to acoustical stimulation. Proc
Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1930;16(5):344-50. doi: 10.1073/pnas.16.5.344
4. Aran JM. Electrocochleography: final results in children and in several pathological cases. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 1970;91:733-7.
5. Hall JW. New handbook of auditory evoked responses. 1st ed. Boston: Pearson; 2007.
6. Pearson BW, Brackmann DE. Committee on hearing and equilibrium guidelines for reporting treatment results in Meniere's disease. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1985;93(5):579-81. doi: 10.1177/019459988509300501
7. Lopez-Escamez JA, Carey J, Chung WH, Goebel JA, Magnusson M, Mandalà M, et al. Diagnostic criteria for Menière's disease. J Vestib Res. 2015;25(1):1-7. doi: 10.3233/VES-150549
8. Margolis RH, Rieks D, Fournier EM, Levine SE. Tym¬panic electrocochleography for diagnosis of Meniere's disease. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;121(1):44-55. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1995.01890010032007
9. Ferraro JA, Arenberg IK, Hassanein RS. Electrocochleography and symptoms of inner ear dysfunction. Arch Otolaryngol. 1985;111(2):71-4. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1985.00800040035001
10. Devaiah AK, Dawson KL, Ferraro JA, Ator GA. Utility of area curve ratio electrocochleography in early Meniere disease. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129(5):547-51. doi: 10.1001/archotol.129.5.547
11. Grasel SS, Beck RMO, Loureiro RSC, Rossi AC, de Almeida ER, Ferraro J. Normative data for TM electrocochleography measures. J Otol. 2017;12(2):68-73. doi: 10.1016/j.joto.2017.04.005
12. Pienkowski M, Adunka OF, Lichtenhan JT. New advances in electrocochleography for clinical and basic investigation. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:310. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00310
13. Odenthal DW, Eggermont JJ. Clinical electrocochleography. Acta Otolaryngol. 1974;77(sup316):62-74. doi: 10.1080/16512251.1974.11675747
14. Karpenko LV, Demina OA, Dvorkina GA, Parshikov SB, Larchet C, Auclair B, et al. Comparative study of methods used for the determination of electroconductivity of ion-exchange membranes. Russ J Electrochem. 2001;37(3):287-93. doi: 10.1023/A:1009081431563
15. Sato T, inventor. Silver, silver chloride electrodes. United States patent US 3,834,373. 1974 Sep 10.
16. Ferraro JA. Electrocochleography in the diagnosis and possible prediction of Meniere's disease/endolymphatic hydrops. J Hear Sci. 2017;7(2).40-40. 1/3p.
17. Hornibrook J, Flook E, Greig S, Babbage M, Goh T, Coates M, et al. MRI inner ear imaging and tone burst electrocochleography in the diagnosis of Ménière’s disease. Otol Neurotol. 2015;36(6):1109-14. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000782
18. Coats A. Electrocochleography: recording techniques and clinical applications. Semin Hear. 1986;7(3):247-66. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1091462
19. Mori N, Asai A, Suizu Y, Ohta K, Matsunaga T. Comparison between electrocochleography and glycerol test in the diagnosis of Meniere's disease. Scand Audiol. 1985;14(4):209-13. doi: 10.3109/01050398509045943
20. Goin DW, Staller SJ, Asher DL, Mischke RE. Summating potential in Meniere's disease. The Laryngoscope. 1982;92(12):1383-9. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198212000-00008
21. Ayub A, Qi L, Nunez DA. A systematic review and meta-analysis of extratympanic electrocochleography in Ménière’s disease diagnosis. Int J Audiol. 2019;58(9):533-40. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2019.1606947
22. Oh KH, Kim KW, Chang J, Jun HS, Kwon EH, Choi JY, et al. Can we use electrocochleography as a clinical tool in the diagnosis of Meniere’s disease during the early symptomatic period? Acta Otolaryngol. 2014;134(8):771-5. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2014.907500
23. Tiefenbach M, Shehata-Dieler W, Cebulla M. [electrocochleography using transtympanic, ear drum and ear canal electrode in diagnosis of morbus Meniere]. Laryngorhinootologie. 2015;94(10):676-80. German. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1547286.
24. Lake AB, Stuart A. The effect of test, electrode, and rate on electrocochleography measures. J Am Acad Audiol. 2019;30(1):41-53. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17081
25. Stypulkowski PH, Staller SJ. Clinical evaluation of a new ECoG recording electrode. Ear Hear. 1987;8(5):304-10. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198710000-00010
26. Nishida H, Komatsuzaki A, Noguchi Y. A new electrode (HIM-5) for CM measurement in extratympanic electrocochleography. Audiology. 1998;37(1):7-16.
Published
2020-04-25
How to Cite
1.
Eyvazi M, Pourbakht A, Sameni SJ, Kamali M. Clinical evaluation of a new electrocochleography recording electrode. Aud Vestib Res. 29(2):93-100.
Section
Research Article(s)