Dichotic listening processing in patients with multiple sclerosis

  • Mahsa Habibi Mail Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Saeid Farahani ORCID Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Nematollah Rouhbakhsh ORCID Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Farzaneh Zamiri Abdollahi ORCID Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Shohreh Jalaie ORCID Biostatistics, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Speech perception; auditory processing; dichotic listening; multiple sclerosis; binaural hearing


Background and Aim: Dichotic listening disorders occur secondary to interhemispheric transfer dysfunction. Central processing tests such as staggered spondaic words (SSW) and dichotic digits test (DDT) are recommended for the evaluation of dichotic listening in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The present study aimed to evaluate dichotic listening in subjects with MS by SSW and DDT.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 45 patients with MS, including 20 males (mean ± SD age: 35.95 ± 5.73 y) and 25 females (mean ± SD age: 37.40 ± 6.1 y) and their data were collected by the Persian version of SSW (P-SSW) and DDT. The results compared to 45 normal subjects age- and gender-matched as the control group.
Results: In patients with MS, P-SSW quantitative and qualitative errors (except for Sm2 and reversals), errors were significantly more than the control group (p ≤ 0.001). Right and left ear scores in DDT for the patients with MS were significantly lower, and right ear advantage was significantly higher than that in the control group (p ≤ 0.001). The results also showed a significant correlation between the test of P-SSW and DDT in the left ear.
Conclusion: The present study showed that patients with MS have lower performance in dichotic listening and binaural processing than normal peers. Identification of binaural processing deficit in patients with MS may lead to early rehabilitation and improving their function by facilitating auditory processing.


1. Katz J, Smith PS. The staggered spondaic word test. a ten-minute look at the central nervous system through the ears. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1991;620:233-51.
2. Matas CG, de Andrade Matas SL, de Oliveira CRS, Gonçalves IC. Auditory evoked potentials and multiple sclerosis. Arq. Neuro-Psiquiatr. 2010;68(4):528-34. doi: 10.1590/S0004-282X2010000400010
3. Calabresi PA. Diagnosis and management of multiple sclerosis. Am Fam Physician. 2004;70(10):1935-44.
4. Lewis MS, Lilly DJ, Hutter M, Bourdette DN, Saunders J, Fausti SA. Some effects of multiple sclerosis on speech perception in noise: Preliminary findings. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006;43(1):91-8.
5. Graham J. Managing multiple sclerosis naturally: a self-help guide to living with ms. Vermont: Healing Arts Press. 2010.
6. Goldenberg MM. Multiple sclerosis review. P T. 2012;37(3):175-84.
7. McCabe MP. Mood and self-esteem of persons with multiple sclerosis following an exacerbation.
J Psychosom Res. 2005;59(3):161-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.04.010
8. O'Connor P. Multiple sclerosis: everything you need to know. Revised edition. New York: Firefly Books (U.S) Inc. 2005.
9. Bellis TJ. Assessment and management of central auditory processing disorder, in the educational setting: from science to practice. 2nd ed. San Diego: Singular publishing group; 2011.
10. Rawool VW. Temporal processing in the auditory system. In: Geffner D, Ross-Swain D, editors. Auditory processing disorders: Assessment, management, and treatment. San Diego: Plural Publishing, Inc; 2007. p. 117-37.
11. Geffner D, Ross-Swain D. Auditory processing disor¬ders: assessment, management and treatment. 2nd ed. San Diego: Plural Publishing; 2012.
12. Berlin CI, Lowe-Bell SS, Jannetta PJ, Kline DG. Central auditory deficits after temporal lobectomy. Arch Otolaryngol. 1972;96(1):4-10.
13. Katz J. The use of staggered spondaic words for assessing the integrity of the central auditory nervous-system. J Aud Res.1962;2:327-37.
14. Negin E, Barootiyan SS. Staggered Spondaic Word Test. (Central) auditory processing assessments: Buffalo Auditory Processing Model. Tehran: Setayesh Hasty; 1396. p. 88-123.
15. El-Zarea GA, Shalaby AA, Hussin HM, Mohammad A. Evaluation of central auditory processing in egyptian multiple sclerosis patients. Egypt J Hosp Med. 2018;71(7);3667-75.
16. Peñaloza López YR, Orozco Peña XD, Pérez Ruiz SJ. Multiple sclerosis: multiple sclerosis: left advantage for auditory laterality in dichotic tests of central auditory processing and relationship of psychoacoustic tests with the multiple sclerosis disability scale-EDSS. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2018;69(6):325-30. doi: 10.1016/j.otorri.2017.11.003
17. Valadbeigi A, Rouhbakhsh N, Mohammadkhani G, Jalaie S, Musiek FE, Jalilvand Karimi L. [Comparison the duration patterns sequence test (DPST)between multiple sclerosis and normal participants]. Journal of Modern Rehabilitation. 2012;5(4):35-41. Persian.
18. Atcherson SR, Nagaraj NK, Kennett SE, Levisee M. Overview of central auditory processing deficits in older adults. Semin Hear. 2015;36(3):150-61. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1555118
19. McArdlw R, Hnath-Chisolm Th.Speech Audiometry. In: Katz J, Chasin M, English K, Hood L, Tillery KL. Handbook of Clinical Audiology. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009. p. 61-77.
20. Shahmir B, Hajiabolhassan F, Mohammadkhani G, Tahaei AA, Jalaie S. Development and evaluation of the reliability of Persian version of double dichotic digit test in girls aged 7 to 11 years. Aud Vestib Res, 2015;24(3):164-70.
21. Rezapour M, Zamiri Abdollahi F, Delphie M, Lotft Y, Bakhshi E. Normalization and reliability evaluation of persian version of two-pair dichotic digits in 8 to 12-year-old children. Iranian Rehabilitation Journal. 2016;14(2):115-20.
22. Moncrieff DW. Dichotic listening in children: age-related changes in direction and magnitude of ear advantage. Brain Cogn. 2011;76(2):316-22. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.03.013
23. Musiek FE, Cheek DE. Dichotic paradigms and multiple sclerosis. Canadian Hearing Report, 2015:10;7-13.
24. Mustillo P. Auditory deficits in multiple sclerosis: a review. Audiology. 1984;23(2):145-64.
25. Lindeboom J, ter Horst R. Interhemispheric discon¬nection effects in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1988;51(11):1445-7.
26. Gadea M, Marti-Bonmatí L, Arana E, Espert R, Salvador A, Casanova B. Corpus callosum function in verbal dichotic listening: inferences from a longitudinal follow-up of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients. Brain Lang. 2009;110(2):101-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2009.03.006
27. Berlow YA, Pollaro J, Krisky C, Grinstead J, Snodgrass M, Kohout K, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging correlates of dichotic listening performance in multiple sclerosis. Semin Hear. 2012;33(03):283-94. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1315727
28. Lewis MS, Wilmington D, Hutter M, McMillan G, Casiana L, Fitzpatrick M, et al. Preliminary identification of central auditory processing screening tests for individuals with multiple sclerosis. Semin Hear 2012;33(03):261-73. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1315725
How to Cite
Habibi M, Farahani S, Rouhbakhsh N, Zamiri Abdollahi F, Jalaie S. Dichotic listening processing in patients with multiple sclerosis. Aud Vestib Res. 28(4):221-227.
Research Article(s)