Stress deafness in Persian speakers
,
Abstract
Background and Aim: The current study has been designed based on the framework of the Stress Deafness Model (SDM), and aims at investigating native listeners’ general perceptual sensitivity to the acoustic correlates of stress in Persian, a language with predictable stress. According to SDM, more regularity in a language implies poorer perceptual sensitivity of its native speakers, as regular stress patterns will not require lexical encoding.
Methods: The experiment was a modified method of adjustment task where subjects had to simulate stimuli played to them. A total of thirty five Persian speakers took part in the experiment and were placed in three groups based on their linguistic background. In addition to overall perceptual sensitivity, the effect of exposure to English and phonetic knowledge were also tested.
Results: Persian speakers showed a weak perception of stress correlates. It was found, however, that exposure to English will improve stress deafness among Persian natives (p<0.0001). However, the results failed to show any significant effect by phonetic knowledge. It was also shown that the duration had the most erroneous perception by participants (p=0.0001), while there was no statistically significant difference between understanding fundamental frequency clues and intensity perception by listeners.
Conclusion: Since Persian speakers showed an overall weak perception of stress correlates, the results support the predictions made by SDM.
2. Sluijter AM, van Heuven VJ. Spectral balance as an acoustic correlate of linguistic stress. J Acoust Soc Am. 1996;100(4 Pt 1):2471-85.
3. Kahnemuyipour A. Syntactic categories and Persian stress. Nat Lang Linguist Theory. 2003;21(2),337-79.
4. Beckman ME, Edwards J. Articulatory evidence for differentiating stress categories. In: Keating PA, editor. Phonological structure and phonetic form (papers in laboratory phonology III). 1st ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1994. p. 7-33.
5. Best CT. A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In: Strange W, editor. Speech perception and linguistics experience: issues in cross-language research. 1st ed. Timonium, MD: York Press; 1995. p. 171-204.
6. Brown C. The interrelation between speech perception and phonological acquisition from infant to adult. In: Archibald J, editor. Second language acquisition and linguistic theory. 1st ed. oxford: Blackwell; 2000. p. 4-64.
7. Escudero P, Hayes-Harb R, Mitterer H. Novel second-Language words and assymmetric lexical access. J Phon. 2008:36(2):345-60.
8. Dupoux E, Pallier C, Sabastián-Gallés N, Mehler J. A destressing "deafness" in French?
9. J Mem Lang. 1997;36(3):406-21.
10. Dupoux E, Peperkamp S, Sabastián- Gallés N. A robust method to study stress "deafness". J Acoust Soc Am. 2001;110(3 Pt 1):1606-18.
11. Peperkamp S, Vendalin I, Dupoux E. Perception of predictable stress: A cross-linguistic investigation. J Phon. 2010:38(3):422-30.
12. Peperkamp S, Dupoux E. A typological study of stress "deafness". In: Gussenhoven C, Warner N, editors. Laboratory Phonology 7. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter; 2002. p. 203-40.
13. Dupoux E, Peperkamp S. Fossil markers of language development: phonological "deafness" in adult speech processing. In: Durand J, Laks B, editors. Phonetics, phonology, and cognition. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002. p. 168-90.
14. Kang Y. Tutorial overview: Suprasegmental adaptation in loanwords. Lingua. 2010;120(9):2295-310.
15. Hillenbrand J, Getty LA, Clark MJ, Wheeler K. Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995;97(5 Pt 1):3099-111.
16. Nguyen TTA, Ingram J. Vietnamese acquisition of English word stress. TESOL Quart. 2005;39(2):309-19.
| Issue | Vol 21 No 3 (2012) | |
| Section | Research Article(s) | |
| Keywords | ||
| Speech perception stress deafness model Persian speakers perceptual cues synthetic stimuli | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
