Cued speech: full access to spoken language for the hearing impaired

  • Guita Movallali Mail Pediatric Neurorehabilitation Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Mahdi Abdollahzadeh Rafi Department of Psychology and Education of Exceptional Children, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Cued speech, lip-reading, speech-reading, hearing impaired, spoken language


Background and Aim: A system that could make speech visible to deaf people has been dreamt of for long time. Several systems have been developed during recent decades; with the most popular being cued speech invented 50 years ago by Cornett (1967). The aim of this article is to review researches about cued speech and its efficacy on different language skills of hearing impaired children.
Methods: In this article we reviewed researches on cued peech and its impacts on speech and literacy of hearing impaired children. We searched Medline, Proquest and Scopus search engines with the “cued speech” keyword and read all textbooks and thesis published between 1972 and 2011. Cued speech is an oral system which makes the sounds visible and accessible. It makes speech perception much simpler and improves lip-reading skills and ability of using residual hearing in hearing impaired children.
Conclusion: Cued speech enhances children’s communication and speech perception and discrimination from early ages. It improves speech and ability to benefit from cochlear implantation. The original impetus behind cued speech was to improve literacy levels of hearing impaired children and it has been found to be uniquely successful.


1. McGurk H, MacDonald J. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature. 1976;264(5588):746-8.
2. LaSasso CJ, Crain KL, Leybaert J. Cued speech and cued language for deaf and hard of hearing children. 1st ed. San Diego: Plural Publishing, Inc; 2010.
3. Leybaert J, Lechat J. Variability in deaf children's spelling: The effect of language experience. J Educ Psychol. 2001;93(3):554-62.
4. LaSasso C, Crain K, Leybaert J. Rhyme generation in deaf students: the effect of exposure to cued speech. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2003;8(3):250-70.
5. Descourtieux C, Groh V, Rusterholtz A, Simoulin I, Busquet D. Cued speech in the stimulation of communication: an advantage in cochlear implantation. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1999;47(2):205-7.
6. Wheeler A, Archbold SM, Hardie T, Watson LM. Children with cochlear implants: the communication journey. Cochlear Implants Int. 2009;10(1):41-62.
7. Marschark M, Spencer PE, Nathan PE. The Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011.
8. Movallali G. Sara lip-reading test; Development, standardization and evaluation in a group with acquired hearing impairment. J Rehab. 2001;3(1):32-37. Persian.
9. Movallali G. Teaching lipreading (speechreading) skills. Audiol. 2004:13(1):45-50. Persian.
10. Movallali G, Moussavi A. Review of 50 years research about speech reading. Audiol. 2003;11(1-2):65-76. Persian.
11. Krause JC, Pelley-Lopez KA, Tessler MP. A method for transcribing the manual components of cued speech. Speech Commun. 2011;53(3):379-89.
12. Movallali G, Afrooz GhA, Hassan-Zadeh S, Malakooti B. Evaluation of the effects of Persian cued speech practice upon speech discrimination scores of hearing impaired children. Audiol. 2010;19(2):39-46. Persian.
13. Cornett RO. Cued speech, manual complement to lipreading, for visual reception of spoken language. Principles, practice and prospects for automation. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 1988;42(3):375-84.
14. Alegria J, Lechat J. Phonological processing in deaf children: when lipreading and cues are incongruent. J Deaf Stu Deaf Educ. 2005;10(2):122-3.
15. Nicholls GH, Ling D. Cued Speech and the reception of spoken language. J Speech Hear Res. 1982;25(2):262-9.
16. Santana R. Papel de la palabra complementada en el desarrollo yuso de las representaciones fonologicas en el sordo [Cued speech role on the development and use of deaf's phonological representations]. [Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation]. Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain: University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria; 1999.
17. Uchanski RM, Delhorne LA, Dix AK, Braida LD, Reed CM, Durlach NI. Automatic speech recognition to aid the hearing impaired: prospects for the automatic generation of cued speech. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1994;31(1):20-41.
18. Santana Hernández R, Torres Monreal S, García Orza J. The role of cued speech in the development of Spanish prepositions. Am Ann Deaf. 2003;148(4):323-32.
19. Leybaert J, D'Hondt M. Neurolinguistic development in deaf children: the effect of early language experience. Int J Audiol. 2003;42 Suppl 1:S34-40.
20. Torres S, Moreno-Torres I, Santana R. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of linguistic input support to a prelingually deaf child with cued speech: a case study. J Deaf Stu Deaf Educ. 2006;11(4):438-48.
21. Reamy CE, Brackett D. Communication methodologies: options for families. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1999;32(6):1103-16.
22. Charlier BL. Complete signed and cued French. An original signed language-cued speech combination. Am Ann Deaf. 1992;137(4):331-7.
23. Tammasaeng MC. The effects of cued speech upon tonal perception of the Thai language by hearing-impaired children. In: Taylor IG, editor. The education of the deaf-current perspectives, Vol. 1, 1985 international congress on the education of the deaf. Beckenham, Kent, UK: Croom Helm Ltd; 1987.
24. Reed CM, Rabinowitz WM, Durlach NI, Delhorne LA, Braida LD, Pemberton JC, et al. Analytic study of the Tadoma method: improving performance through the use of supplementary tactual displays. J Speech Hear Res. 1992;35(2):450-65.
25. Cornett RO, Daisey ME. The cued speech resource book for parents of deaf children. 2nd ed. Cleveland, OH: National Cued Speech Association; 2000.
26. Vieu A, Mondain M, Blanchard K, Sillon M, Reuillard-Artieres F, Tobey E, et al. Influence of communication mode on speech intelligibility and syntactic structure of sentences in profoundly hearing impaired French children implanted between 5 and 9 years of age. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1998;44(1):15-22.
27. Brentari D, Wolk S. The relative effects of three expressive methods upon the speech intelligibility of profoundly deaf speakers. J Commun Disord. 1986;19(3):209-18.
28. Koo D, Crain K, LaSasso C, Eden GF. Phonological awareness and short-term memory in hearing and deaf individuals of different communication backgrounds. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1145:83-99.
29. Leybaert J, LaSasso CJ. Cued speech for enhancing speech perception and first language development of children with cochlear implants. Trends Amplif. 2010;14(2):96-112.
30. Marschark M, Spenser PE. Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education. 1st ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003.
31. Charlier BL, Leybaert J. The rhyming skills of deaf children educated with phonetically augmented speechreading. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2000;53(2):349-75.
32. Duchnowski P, Lum DS, Krause JC, Sexton MG, Bratakos MS, Braida LD. Development of speechreading supplements based on automatic speech recognition. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2000;47(4):487-96.
33. Vernon M. Fifty years of research on the intelligence of deaf and hard-of-hearing children: a review of literature and discussion of implications. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2005;10(3):225-31.
34. Marschark M, Sapere P, Convertino CM, Mayer C, Wauters L, Sarchet T. Are deaf students' reading challenges really about reading? Am Ann Deaf. 2009;154(4):357-70.
35. Harris M, Terlektsi E. Reading and spelling abilities of deaf adolescents with cochlear implants and hearing AIDS. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2011;16(1):24-34.
36. Colin S, Magnan A, Ecalle J, Leybaert J. Relation between deaf children's phonological skills in kindergarten and word recognition performance in first grade. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007;48(2):139-46.
37. Leybaert J. Phonology acquired through the eyes and spelling in deaf children. J Exp Child Psychol. 2000;75(4):291-318.
38. Woodhouse L, Hickson L, Dodd B. Review of visual speech perception by hearing and hearing-impaired people: clinical implications. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2009;44(3):253-70.
39. Movallali G, Biglariyan A. Designing Sara Lipreading test (No.2) and implementing it in hearing adults. J Rehab. 2003;4(2):53-8. Persian
40. Wang Y, Trezek BJ, Luckner JL, Paul PV. The role of phonology and phonologically related skills in reading instruction for students who are deaf or hard of hearing. Am Ann Deaf. 2008;153(4):396-407.
41. Moreno-Torres I, Torres S. From 1-word to 2-words with cochlear implant and cued speech: a case study. Clin Linguist Phon. 2008;22(7):491-508.
42. Harris M, Marschark M. Literacy in the classroom and beyond. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2011;16 (1):1.
43. Hanson VL, Shankweiler D, Fischer FW. Determinants of spelling ability in deaf and hearing adults: access to linguistic structure. Cognition. 1983;14(3):323-44.
44. Marschark M, Johnson HA. From research to practice. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2008;13(1):1-2.
45. Jones MC. Cued speech. ASHA. 1992;34(1):74.
How to Cite
Movallali G, Abdollahzadeh Rafi M. Cued speech: full access to spoken language for the hearing impaired. Aud Vestib Res. 21(2):1-18.
Review Article(s)