Intonation and duration curve in Persian interrogative sentences
,
Abstract
Background and Aim: prosody is a very important factor in communication and includes such parameters as: duration, intonation, pitch, stress, rhythm etc. Intonation is the pitch variation in one sentence. Duration is the time taken to utter a voice. The aim of the present study was to evaluate some parameters of prosody such as duration and intonation curve in interrogative sentences among normal Farsi speaking adults in order to determine the characteristics of this aspect of language with an emphasis on laboratory testing.
Methods: This study was performed as a cross-sectional one. The participants included 134 male and female Farsi speaking individuals aging between 18-30 years. In this study two interrogative sentences with open and closed answers were used. The voice samples were analyzed by Dr.speech -real analysis software. Data analysis incorporated unilateral analysis of variance and an intonation curve was drawn for each sentence.
Results: The parameter of duration among men and women was significantly different (p:0.001). Duration in open questions was significantly longer than yes/no questions (p:0.001). The intonation curve of the two groups were similar.
Conclusion: Men and women use duration changes, for making difference in prosody. On the whole, duration among women is longer than men. In open questions, the duration of sentences is mostly due to the question word. The intonation curve in open questions has more amplitude. Women show much more changes in basic frequency for transferring interrogative state in their expressions.
2. van Santen JP, Prud'hommeaux ET, Black LM. Automated assessment of prosody production. Speech Commun. 2009;51(11):1082-97.
3. Aziz-Zadeh L, Sheng T, Gheytanchi A. Common premotor regions for the perception and production of prosody and correlations with empathy and prosodic ability. PLoS One. 2010;5(1):e8759.
4. Wennerstrom A. The music of everyday speech: prosody and discourse analysis. 1st ed. New York: OxFord University Press; 2001.
5. Mampe B, Friederici AD, Christophe A, Wermke K. Newborns' cry melody is shaped by their native language. Curr Biol. 2009;19(23):1994-7.
6. Greenberg Y, Shibuya N, Tsuzaki M, Kato H, Sagisaka Y. Analysis on paralinguistic prosody control in perceptual impression space using multiple dimensional scaling. Speech Commun. 2009;51(7):585-93.
7. Ishi CT, Ishiguro H, Hagita N. Automatic extraction of paralinguistic information using prosodic features related to F0, duration and voice quality.Speech Commun. 2008;50(6):531-43.
8. Lickley RJ, Schepman A, Ladd DR. Alignment of "phrase accent" lows in dutch falling rising questions: theoretical and methodological implications. Lang Speech. 2005;48(Pt 2):157-83.
9. Jun S. Prosodic typology. In: Jun S editor. Prosodic typology: the phonology of intonation and phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. p. 430-58.
10. Hayati AM. A contrastive analysis of English and Persian intonation. In: Fisiask J, editor. Papers and studies in contrastive linguistics Volume 34. Poznan: Adam Mickiewicz University; 1998. p. :53-72.
11. Mahootian S. Persian (descriptive grammars). 1st ed. London: Routledge; 1997.
12. Sadat-tehrani N. The alignment of L+H* pitch accents in Persian intonation. J Int Phon Assoc. 2009;39(2):205-30.
13. Clopper CG, Smiljanic R. Effects of gender and regional dialect on prosodic patterns in American English. J Phon. 2011;39(2):237-45.
14. Whitehead RL, Schiavetti N, Metz DE, Gallant D, Whitehead BH. Sentence intonation and syllable stress in speech produced during simultaneous communication. J Commun Disord. 2000;33(5): 429-40; quiz 440-1.
| Issue | Vol 21 No 1 (2012) | |
| Section | Research Article(s) | |
| Keywords | ||
| Prosody intonation curve duration interrogative sentences Persian | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
