Research Article

Standardization of data elements of audiology records: a suitable model for Iran

Abstract

Background and Aim: Providing high quality health care is not possible without information related to the past and current condition of the patient. Records show which services, where, when and by whom was delivered. Documentation is referred to the process of precisely recording the information regarding patient care and treatment. The purpose of this study is to determine the essential data set required in audiology record keeping and designing a model for Iran.
Methods: In an applied research of a descriptive-comparative type which was carried out in 2010, data elements of audiology records of domestic and foreign patient notes were used to compile a check list which was subjected to debate by Iranian audiologists in Delphi method. 110 audiologists and 17 faculty members responded to the opinion poll.
Results: From 51 elements which were subjected to discussion, 37 elements by more than 75 percent of the participants, nine elements by 50 to 75 percent of the participants and five elements by less than 50 percent of the participants, were agreed upon. The only element to be considered more important by faculty members than audiologists was “Gender” (p=0.018). Seventy percent of the participants valued the effectiveness of information in patient records very high.
Conclusion: The minimum data set for audiology records must include demographic information, past medical history, patient assessment and treatment plan. With reference to record design principles this information was used to develop amodel for patient audiology record which also included the necessary instructions for completing it.

1. Fifer R. Documentation requirement related to reimbursement for audiology services. The ASHA leader. 2006; Sep 5.
2. Quinn L, Gordon J. Documentation for rehabilitation: A guide to clinical decision making. 2nd ed. Maryland Heights: Saunders Elsevier; 2010.
3. Staltari CF, Baft-Neff A, Marra LJ, Rentschler GJ. Supervision: formative feedback for clinical documentation in a university speech-language pathology program. Admin Supervis. 2010;20(3):117-23.
4. Hosford-Dunn H, Roser R, Valente M. Audiology practice management. 2nd ed. New Yourk: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2008.
5. Haresabadi F, Puladi S, Mahmoudi Bakhtiyari B, Kamali M. Effect evaluation of utterance length on speech dysfluency in stuttering and nonstuttering Persian-speaker children. Audiol. 2010;19(1):86-93. Persian.
6. Beck D. Case history. In: Katz J, editor. Handbook of clinical audiology. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott William & Wilkins; 2009. p. 116-22.
7. Vogel DA, McCarthy PA, Bratt G, Brewer C. The clinical audiogram: its history and current use. Commun Disord Rev. 2007;1(2):81-94.
8. Standard forms for results of audiometry: British society of audiology. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1976;1(1):91-5.
9. Danermark B, Cieza A, Gangé JP, Gimigliano F, Granberg S, Hickson L, et al. International classification of functioning, disability, and health core sets for hearing loss: a discussion paper and invitation. Int J Audiol. 2010;49(4):256-62.
10. Stephens D, Gianopoulos I, Kerr P. Determination and classification of the problems experienced by hearing-impaired elderly people. Audiology. 2001;40(6):294-300.
11. Liu D, Castle NG, Diesel J. Does use of advanced information technology in commercial minimum data set systems improve quality of nursing home care? Am J Med Qual. 2010;25(2):116-27.
12. Halpin CF, Iezzoni LI, Rauch S. Medical record documentation of patients' hearing loss by physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(4):517-9.
13. Okoli C, Pawlowski SD. The delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Inf Manage. 2004;42(1):15-29.
14. Huffman EK. Health information management. 10th ed. Illinois: Physicians Record Company; 1994.
15. Northern J, Downs M. Hearing in children. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002.
IssueVol 21 No 1 (2012) QRcode
SectionResearch Article(s)
Keywords
Audiology standardization documentation data collection

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Arastoo AA, Nickbakht M, Ghasemzadeh R, Azizi A, Zahednejad S, Latifi SM. Standardization of data elements of audiology records: a suitable model for Iran. Aud Vestib Res. 2017;21(1):26-37.