Acoustic explanation of fundamental frequency of onset in initial plosives by cochlear-implanted children and normal hearings
,
Abstract
Background and Aim: Fundamental frequency (F0) of onset is a reliable acoustic cue of voicing differences in plosive consonants. The purpose of present study was to acoustically analyze of the F0 amount of oral plosive consonants in the initial position of words in cochlear-implanted children and normal hearings.
Methods: In this study, the F0 of onset was measured in the speech production of 47 prelingual deaf children who were cochlear implanted about 61 months before the test (range: 47-76 months, SD: 8.6) and the results were compared with 60 normal hearing children who were 60 months old (range: 49-73, SD: 6.5).
Results: Using repeated measurement tests, it was shown that in all places of articulation, the amount of F0 of onset in voiceless plosives was higher than that of voiced ones, because of the low position of larynx and hyoid bone in voiced plosives. On the other hand, in most cases, the F0 of cochlear-implanted children was lower than that of normal hearings; and in voiced plosives, there were significant differences (p=0.005) between cochlear implanted and normal hearing children. There was not any significant difference between the F0 of onset in girls and boys.
Conclusion: In all places of articulation, the mean amount of F0 of onset for voiceless plosives was higher than that of voiced plosives. There was significant difference between F0 of onset in cochlear implanted and normal hearing children.
2. Trollinger VL. Relationships between pitch-matching accuracy, speech fundamental frequency, speech range, age, and gender in American English-speaking preschool children. Journal of Research in Music Education. 2003;51(1):78-94.
3. Haggard M, Ambler S, Callow M. Pitch as a voicing cue. J Acoust Soc Am. 1970;47(2B):613-17.
4. Whiteside SP, Hodgson C. Some acoustic characteristics in the voices of 6- to 10-year-old children and adults: a comparative sex and developmental perspective. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2000;25(3):122-32.
5. Robb MP, Smith AB. Fundamental frequency onset and offset behavior: a comparative study of children and adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002;45(3):446-56.
6. Hocevar-Boltezar I, Vatovec J, Gros A, Zargi M. The influence of cochlear implantation on some voice parameters. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005;69(12):1635-40.
7. Iyer SN, Oller DK. Fundamental frequency development in typically developing infants and infants with severe-to-profound hearing loss. Clin Linguist Phon. 2008;22(12):917-36.
8. Haggard M, Summerfield Q, Roberts M. Psychoacoustical and cultural determinants of phoneme boundaries: Evidence from trading F0 cues in the voiced-voiceless distinction. J Phon. 1981;9:49-62.
9. Hombert JM, Ohala JJ, Ewan WG. Phonetic explanations for the development of tones. Language. 1979;55(1):37-58.
10. Torre P 3rd, Barlow JA. Age-related changes in acoustic characteristics of adult speech. J Commun Disord. 2009;42(5):324-33.
11. Raj A, Gupta B, Chowdhury A, Chadha S. A study of voice changes in various phases of menstrual cycle and in postmenopausal women. J Voice. 2010;24(3):363-8.
12. Guyton AC, Hall JE. Textbook of medical physiology. 11th ed. Philadelphia, Pensylvania: Elsevier Saunders; 2006.
13. Diehl RL, Lotto AJ, Holt LL. Speech perception. Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:149-79.
14. Bernstein LE. Perceptual development for labeling words varying in voice onset time and fundamental frequency. J Phon. 1983;11(4):383-93.
15. Holt LL, Lotto AJ, Kluender KR. Influence of fundamental frequency on stop-consonant voicing perception: a case of learned covariation or auditory enhancement? J Acoust Soc Am. 2001;109(2):764-74.
| Issue | Vol 22 No 3 (2013) | |
| Section | Research Article(s) | |
| Keywords | ||
| Fundamental frequency of onset cochlear implant articulation of plosive consonant voicing | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
