Comparing the bone conduction auditory steady state response in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss and normal hearing

  • Sara Afifian Departmant of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran Univercity of Medical Sciences, Iran
  • Masume Roozbahani Mail Departmant of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran Univercity of Medical Sciences, Iran
  • Mohamad Ebrahim Mahdavi Departmant of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshty Univercity of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Keywords:
Aauditory steady state response, pure tone audiometry, sensorineural hearing loss

Abstract

Background and Aim: The auditory steady state response is a modern test for estimating hearing thresholds, especially in difficult to test individuals. However, there are few bone conduction auditory steady state response data, particularly for individuals with hearing loss. The objective of this study was to investigate bone conduction auditory steady state response thresholds in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss and normal hearing.
Methods: In a cross-sectional study, 10 individuals with normal hearing and 10 with sensorineural hearing loss at the age of 15-30 years were selected by non-probability sampling. Auditory steady state response and pure tone audiometry to bone conduction stimuli in 500 and 2000 Hz were recorded in two groups. Paired and independent t-test were used to compare data between the groups.
Results: There was low correlation between bone conduction auditory steady state response and pure tone audiometry in both groups (p>0.05 for both). The difference of behavioral thresholds and auditory steady state response in 500 Hz was higher than 2000 Hz in both groups (p=0.033 for normal hearing and p=0.017 for sensorineural hearing loss groups). Comparison of these results showed significant differences between the two groups (p<0.001).
Conclusion: In both groups, there was low correlation between bone conduction auditory steady state response and pure tone audiometry thresholds. In individuals with sensorineural hearing loss and in higher frequencies, bone conduction auditory steady state response thresholds was closer to pure tone audiometery thresholds.

References

1. Cone-Wesson B, Rickards F, Poulis C, Parker J, Tan L, Pollard J. The auditory steady-state response: clinical observations and applications in infants and children. J Am Acad Audiol. 2002;3(5):270-82.
2. Van Maanen A, Stapells DR. Normal multiple auditory steady-state responses to air-conducted stimuli in infants. J Am Acad Audiol. 2009;20(3):196-207.
3. Rance G, Tomlin D, Rickards F. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and tone-burst auditory brainstem responses in normal babies. Ear Hear. 2006;27(6):751-62.
4. Burkard R, Nerney KM. Introduction to auditory evoked potentials. In: Katz J, Medwestkey L, Burkard R, Hood L, editors. Hand book of clinical audiology. 6th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009.p.225.
5. Hall JW. New hand book of auditory evoked response .2nd ed. Boston: Person Education; 2007.
6. Dimitrijevic A, John MS, van Roon P, Purcell DW, Adamonis J, Ostroff Nedzelski JM, et al. Estimating the audiogram using multiple auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol. 2002;13(4):205-24.
7. John MS, Dimitrijevic A, Picton TW. Efficient stimuli for evoking auditory steady-state responses. Ear Hear. 2003;24(5):406-23.
8. Small SA, Stapells DR. Multiple auditory steady-state response thresholds to bone-conduction stimuli in young infants with normal hearing. Ear Hear. 2006;27(3):219-28.
9. Brooke E, Brennan K, Chester Stevens J. Bone conduction auditory steady state response: investigations into reducing artifact. Ear Hear. 2009;30(1):23-30.
10. Jeng FC, Brown CJ, Johnson TA. Estimating air-bone gaps using auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol. 2004;15(1):67-78.
11. Small SA, Stapells DR. Multiple auditory steady-state response thresholds to bone-conduction stimuli in adults with normal hearing. J Am Acad Audiol. 2005;16(3):172-83.
12. Swanepoel de W, Ebrahim S, Friedland P, Swanepoel A, Pottas L. Auditory steady-state responses to bone conduction stimuli in children with hearing loss. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;72(12):1861-71.
13. Jafarzadeh S, Jalaie B, Kamali M. A comparison of thresholds in auditory steady state response with pure tone audiometery in subjects with normal hearing and those with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss. Audiol. 2008;17:53-62. Persian.
14. Lin YH, Ho HC, Wu HP. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2009;36(2):140-5.
15. Herdman AT, Stapells DK. Auditory steady-state response thresholds of adults with sensorineural hearing impairments. Int J Audiol. 2003;42(5):237-48.
16. Picton TW, John MS, Dimitrijevic A, Purcell D. Human auditory steady-state responses. Int J Audiol. 2003;42(4):177-219.
17. Kaf WA, Durrant JD, Sabo DL. Validity and accuracy of electric response audiometry using the auditory steady-state response: evaluation in an empirical design. Int J Audiol. 2006;45(4):211-23.
18. Lins OG, PictonTW, Boucher BL, Durieux-Smith A, Champagne SC, Moran LM, et al. Frequency-specific audiometry using steady-state responses. Ear Hear.1996;17(2):81-96.
Published
2017-07-31
How to Cite
1.
Afifian S, Roozbahani M, Mahdavi ME. Comparing the bone conduction auditory steady state response in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss and normal hearing. Aud Vestib Res. 22(4):28-34.
Section
Research Article(s)