The linguistic comparison of picture-elicited narratives in borderline-intelligence and typically-developed school-age children
Abstract
Background and Aim: Students with borderline intelligence quotient experience types of language disorders that are seen in their narratives, too. This research aimed to investigate the linguistic characteristics of picture-elicited narratives in school-aged children with borderline intelligence quotient.
Methods: In a cross-sectional study, 30 students with borderline intelligence quotient and 25 typically developing children at the age of 6-13 years were randomly selected from a population of four schools. Narrative discourse was elicited with description of pictures of one storybook.
Results: Students with borderline IQ were weaker than typically developing children in complex (p<0.001), compound sentences (p<0.001) and produced more ungrammatical sentences (p=0.007). Students with borderline intelligence quotient produced fewer related (p<0.001) but more unrelated information (p=0.033); and types of cohesive (p=0.010) and "HAM" conjunction (p=0.022) was fewer in them.
Conclusion: Students with borderline intelligence quotient showed more linguistic impairment in description of story.
2. Bliss LS, McCabe A. Comparison of discourse genres: clinical implications. Con Com Sci Dis. 2006;33:126-37.
3. Szaflarski JP, Altaye M, Rajagopol A, Eton K, Meng X. A 10-year longitudinal fMRI study of narrative comprehension in children and adolescents. NeuroImage. 2012;63(3):1188-95.
4. Heilmann J, Miller JF, Nockerts A, Dunaway C. Properties of narrative retells in young school-age children. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2010;19(2):154-66.
5. Reed VA. An introduction to children with language disorders. Boston: Pearson. 2005.
6. McCabe A, Bliss L, Barra G, Bennett M. Comparison of personal versus fictional narratives of children with language impairment. Am J speech Lang Pathol. 2008;17(2):194-206.
7. Hemphill L, Tager-Flusberg H, Picardi N. Narrative as an index of communicative competence in mildly mentally retarded children. Appiled Psycholinguistics. 1991;12(3):263-79.
8. Keller-Bell YD, Abbeduto L. Narrative development in adolescents and young adults with fragile x syndrome. Am J Ment Retard. 2007;112(4):289-99.
9. Tager-Flusberg H, Sullivan K. Attributing mental states to story characters: a comparison of narratives produces by autistic and mental retarded individuals. Applied Psycholinguistics. 1995;16(3):241-56.
10. Brown G, Yule G. Discourse analysis. NewYork: Cambridge University Press.1989.
11. Van leer E, Turkstra L. The effect of elicitation task on discourse coherence and cohesion in adolescents with brain Injury. J Commun Disord. 1999;32(5):348-9.
12. Crystal D. A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. Fifth edition. London. Blackwell Publishing. 2003.
13. Miles S, Chapman R, Sindberg H. A microgenetic study of storytelling by adolescents with DS and typically-developing children matched for syntax comprehension. Poster presented at the Symposium for Research on Child Language Disorders, Madison, WI, June; 2004.
14. Miles S, Chapman R. Narrative content as described by individuals with Down syndrome and typically-developing children. J Speech, Lang Hear Res. 2002;45(1):175-89.
15. Hinckley J. Narrative-based practice in speech-language pathology stories of a clinical life. Plural Publishing. 2008.
Issue | Vol 23 No 2 (2014) | |
Section | Research Article(s) | |
Keywords | ||
Narrative language disorder intelligence student |
Rights and permissions | |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |