Evaluation of auditory lateralization ability and its development in normal children with 8 to 11 years of age

  • Yones Lotfi Department of Audiology, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Zahra Hosseini Dastgerdi Mail Department of Audiology, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Abdollah Moossavi Department of Otolaryngology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Saiedeh Mehrkian Department of Audiology, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Enayatollah Bakhshi Department of Biostatistic, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Keywords:
Localization, lateralization, development of binaural hearing, interaural time difference, interaural intensity difference

Abstract

Background and Aim: Auditory lateralization is a binaural phenomenon that is the result of processing of interaural time and intensity cues in the central auditory system. The main advantage of this phenomenon in human is understanding speech in noisy environments due to the auditory sciene analysis and cocktail party effects. The aim of the present study was to assess the auditory lateralization ability in normal children.
Methods: Participants were 80 normal school age children (8-11 years) of both genders, 42 girls and 38 boys. Lateralization functions were determined by interaural time difference (ITD) ranging from -880 to +880 µs and interaural intensity difference (IID) ranging from -10 to +10 dB for high-pass and low-pass noise.
Results: Interaural intensity difference lateralization functions were linear, while the interaural time difference lateralization functions were S-shaped with a clear linear component from -220 to +220 µs and with an asymptote from -440 to -880 µs and +440 to +880 µs. Generally, interaural intensity difference errors were significantly less than interaural time difference tasks (p<0.0001). Age effect was only present in interaural time difference tasks (p=0.001).
Conclusion: According to these results, children with the age of 11 years performed better in lateralization using interaural time difference cues compared to other children; whereas there was no difference in performance in all ages when using interaural intensity difference cues.

References

1. Van Deun L, van Wieringen A, Van den Bogaert T, Scherf F, Offeciers FE, Van de Heyning PH, et al. Sound localization, sound lateralization, and binaural masking level differences in young children with normal hearing. Ear Hear. 2009;30(2):178-90.
2. Matthews N, Todd J, Budd TW, Cooper G, Michie PT. Auditory lateralization in schizophrenia--mismatch negativity and behavioral evidence of a selective impairment in encoding interaural time cues. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007;118(4):833-44.
3. Sams M, Hämäläinen M, Hari R, McEvoy L. Human auditory cortical mechanisms of sound lateralization: I. Interaural time differences within sound. Hear Res. 1993;67(1-2):89-97.
4. Ashmead DH, Davis DL, Whalen T, Odom RD. Sound localization and sensitivity to interaural time differences in human infants. Child Dev. 1991;62(6):1211-26.
5. Ludwig AA, Rübsamen R, Dörrscheidt GJ, Kotz SA. Age-related dissociation of sensory and decision-based auditory motion processing. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012;6:64.
6. Muir DW, Clifton RK, Clarkson MG. The development of a human auditory localization response: a U-shaped function. Can J Psychol. 1989;43(2):199-216.
7. Kaga M. Development of sound localization. Pediatr Int. 1992;34(2):134-8.
8. Zakaria MN, Patuzzi RB. Auditory localization abilities in subjects with central auditory processing disorder (CAPD). [Dissertation]. Perth: School of Biomedical and Chemical Sciences, the University of Western Australia; 2008.
9. Kühnle S, Ludwig AA, Meuret S, Küttner C, Witte C, Scholbach J, et al. Development of auditory localization accuracy and auditory spatial discrimination in children and adolescents. Audiol Neurootol. 2013;18(1):48-62.
10. Babkoff H, Muchnik C, Ben-David N, Furst M, Even-Zohar S, Hildesheimer M. Mapping lateralization of click trains in younger and older populations. Hear Res. 2002;165(1-2):117-27.
11. Moore DR, Cowan JA, Riley A, Edmondson-Jones AM, Ferguson MA. Development of auditory processing in 6- to 11-yr-old children. Ear Hear. 2011;32(3):269-85.
12. Furst M, Algom D. Lateralization and discrimination of dichotic clicks: evidence from patients with brainstem lesions and normal cohorts. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 1995;6(2):149-71.
13. Aharonson V, Furst M, Levine RA, Chaigrecht M, Korczyn AD. Lateralization and binaural discrimination of patients with pontine lesions. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998;103(5 Pt 1):2624-33.
14. Babkoff H, Sutton S. End point of lateralization for dichotic clicks. J Acoust Soc Am. 1966;39(1):87-102.
15. Bernstein LR, Trahiotis C. Enhancing sensitivity to interaural delays at high frequencies by using "transposed stimuli". J Acoust Soc Am. 2002;112(3 Pt 1):1026-36.
Published
2017-07-31
How to Cite
1.
Lotfi Y, Hosseini Dastgerdi Z, Moossavi A, Mehrkian S, Bakhshi E. Evaluation of auditory lateralization ability and its development in normal children with 8 to 11 years of age. Aud Vestib Res. 23(4):60-68.
Section
Research Article(s)