Normalization and validation of Auditory Processing Domain Questionnaire in normal 8-12 year-old children
Background and Aim: Auditory processing disorder (APD) weakens recognition and understanding auditory data and adversely affects children's language and learning if remains undetected and untreated. Since early diagnosis of APD can obviate its adverse effects, screening is hugely important in identifying suspected cases. Auditory Processing Domain Questionnaire (APDQ) is a reliable tool among APD screening methods. The present study aimed to translate and to determine the validity and reliability of APDQ.
Methods: The first phase included translation of APDQ into Persian according to international quality of life assessment (IQOLA) method including forward translation, assessment of translation, and backward translation. The second phase involved establishing face and content validities and reliability of the Persian version of APDQ.
Results: All the items had appropriate quality in terms of translation difficulty following review of 5 items and had appropriate translation quality after review of 21 items. In terms of face validity, more than 80% of the participants gave a score of 4 or higher to the items. In content validity, content validity ratio exceeded 63% in all the items. In determining reliability, Cronbach's alpha in subscales of 1-3 was found to be 0.88, 0.80, and 0.86, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficient for each of the three subscales was higher than 0.92.
Conclusion: The Persian version of APDQ has favorable translation quality, validity, and reliability. The Persian version of APDQ can be used for screening of auditory processing skills in 8 to 12-year-old children.
2. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (central) auditory processing disorders [Technical Report]. 2005. Available from www.asha.org/policy.
3. Bamiou DE, Musiek FE, Luxon LM. Aetiology and clinical presentations of auditory processing disorders--a review. Arch Dis Child. 2001;85(5):361-5.
4. Ebadi E, Jarollahi F, Tahaei AA, Ahadi M, Hosseini AF. Development and evaluation of the Persian version of the multiple auditory processing assessment. Aud Vest Res. 2016;25(2):75-81.
5. Wilson WJ. Screening for central auditory processing disorder. In: Musiek FE, Chermak GD, editors. Handbook of central auditory processing disorder, Volume I: auditory neuroscience and diagnosis. 2nd ed. San Diego: Plural Publishing Inc; 2014. p. 265-90.
6. Atcherson SR, Richburg CM, Zraick RI, George CM. Readability of questionnaires assessing listening difficulties associated with (central) auditory processing disorders. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2013;44(1):48-60.
7. Yalçinkaya F, Muluk NB, Sahin S. Effects of listening ability on speaking, writing and reading skills of children who were suspected of auditory processing difficulty. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;73(8):1137-42.
8. Cacace AT, McFarland DJ. Central auditory processing disorder in school-aged children: a critical review. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998;41(2):355-73.
9. Martin MJ, Billiet CR, Bellis TJ. Audiologic assessment of (C)APD. In: Geffner D, Ross-Swain D, editors. Auditory processing disorders: assessment, management and treatment. 1st ed. San Diego: Plural Publishing; 2007. p. 479-81.
10. Dawes P, Bishop DV. Psychometric profile of children with auditory processing disorder and children with dyslexia. Arch Dis Child. 2010;95(6):432-6.
11. Iliadou V, Bamiou DE, Kaprinis S, Kandylis D, Kaprinis G. Auditory processing disorders in children suspected of learning disabilities--a need for screening? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;73(7):1029-34.
12. Jerger J, Musiek F. Report of the consensus conference on the diagnosis of auditory processing disorders in school-aged children. J Am Acad Audiol. 2000;11(9):467-74.
13. Aaronson NK, Acquadro C, Alonso J, Apolone G, Bucquet D, Bullinger M, et al. International quality of life assessment (IQOLA) project. Qual Life Res. 1992;1(5):349-51.
|Issue||Vol 26 No 2 (2017)|
|Auditory processing disorder ques¬tionnaire screening validity reliability|
|Rights and permissions|
|This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|