Barriers and facilitators to cochlear implantation among children in Karnataka, India
Abstract
Background and Aim: Cochlear implants (CI) offer significant benefits in speech-language and auditory development for children with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss. However, in countries like India, barriers to accessing CI surgery persist, influenced by factors including financial constraints and societal perceptions.. Therefore, the study aimed to investigate barriers and facilitators to CI uptake in Karnataka.
Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted among parents of children who underwent cochlear implantation (CI group, n=82) and those who did not (non-CI group, n=102), in Karnataka, India (n = 184). The questionnaire was developed through expert focus group discussion, literature review, and pilot testing, and included sections on facilitators and barriers to CI uptake. Content validity was established using expert ratings (CVR and CVI), and demographic variables included parental education and socioeconomic status.
Results: The logistic regression model was significant [χ²(4) = 71.25, p < 0.001]. Higher parental education (aOR = 0.56, p < 0.001) and earlier age at recommendation (<3 years; aOR = 0.26, p = 0.001) were significant predictors of CI uptake, while income and gender were not (p > 0.05). Key barriers were financial burden, concerns about surgical complications, family opposition, caregiving responsibilities, and pandemic-related disruptions.
Conclusion: Facilitating CI uptake requires financial support, tailored counselling, and early detection initiatives. Government initiatives should be supplemented with subsidized CI spare parts. . Addressing parental concerns and increasing awareness among healthcare professionals and policymakers are crucial to improve accessibility and outcomes for children with hearing loss.
2. Chee GH, Goldring JE, Shipp DB, Ng AH, Chen JM, Nedzelski JM. Benefits of cochlear implantation in early-deafened adults: the Toronto experience. J Otolaryngol. 2004 Feb;33(1):26-31. DOI: 10.2310/7070.2004.01074
3. Incesulu A, Vural M, Erkam U. Children with cochlear implants: parental perspective. Otol Neurotol. 2003 Jul;24(4):605-11. DOI: 10.1097/00129492-200307000-00013
4. Okubo S, Takahashi M, Kai I. How Japanese parents of deaf children arrive at decisions regarding pediatric cochlear implantation surgery: a qualitative study. Soc Sci Med. 2008 Jun;66(12):2436-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.02.013
5. Li Y, Bain L, Steinberg AG. Parental decision-making in considering cochlear implant technology for a deaf child. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2004 Aug;68(8):1027-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2004.03.010
6. Ravi R, Gunjawate DR. Parent reported barriers and facilitators towards cochlear implantation - A systematic review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Sep;136:110163. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110163]
7. Bierbaum M, McMahon CM, Hughes S, Boisvert I, Lau AYS, Braithwaite J, Rapport F. Barriers and Facilitators to Cochlear Implant Uptake in Australia and the United Kingdom. Ear Hear. 2020 Mar/Apr;41(2):374-385. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000762
8. Ramos-Macías Á, De Raeve L, Holcomb M, Connor E, Taylor A, Deltetto I, Taylor C. Strategies for the implementation of the living guidelines for cochlear implantation in adults. Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 15;11:1272437. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1272437
9. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel psychology. 1975;28(4):563-75.
10. Jeddi Z, Jafari Z, Motasaddi Zarandy M. Effects of parents' level of education and economic status on the age at cochlear implantation in children. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;24(1):7-14. [DOI:10.22038/ijorl.2012.212]
11. Moshtaghi O, Kuan EC, Mahboubi H, Khoshab N, Zardouz S, Yau AY, Rothholtz VS, Lin HW, Djalilian HR. Factors Influencing Access to Cochlear Implantation in Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Children in Southern California. Otol Neurotol. 2019 Feb;40(2):e69-e74. DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002089
12. Hendriksma M, Bruijnzeel H, Bezdjian A, Kay-Rivest E, Daniel SJ, Topsakal V. Quality of life (QoL) evaluation of children using cochlear implants: agreement between pediatric and parent proxy-QoL reports. Cochlear Implants Int. 2020 Nov;21(6):338-343. DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2020.1788858
13. Armstrong M, Maresh A, Buxton C, Craun P, Wowroski L, Reilly B, Preciado D. Barriers to early pediatric cochlear implantation. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Nov;77(11):1869-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.08.031
14. Busi M, Rosignoli M, Castiglione A, Minazzi F, Trevisi P, Aimoni C, Calzolari F, Granieri E, Martini A. Cochlear Implant Outcomes and Genetic Mutations in Children with Ear and Brain Anomalies. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:696281. [DOI: 10.1155/2015/696281]
15. Balakrishnan S, Thangaraj M. Parental Support for Post Operative Intervention of Children with Cochlear Implantation. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Sep;75(3):1958-1967. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-023-03762-w
16. Sud P, Munjal SK, Panda N. Challenges faced by Indian parents in raising a child with a cochlear implant - Impact on communication outcomes. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Sep;172:111695. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2023.111695
17. Nadège C, Valérie G, Laura F, Hélène DB, Vanina B, Olivier D, Bernard F, Laurent M. The cost of cochlear implantation: a review of methodological considerations. Int J Otolaryngol. 2011;2011:210838. [DOI: 10.1155/2011/210838]
18. Dev AN, Lohith U, Pascal B, Dutt CS, Dutt SN. A questionnaire-based analysis of parental perspectives on pediatric cochlear implant (CI) re/habilitation services: a pilot study from a developing CI service in India. Cochlear Implants Int. 2018 Nov;19(6):338-349. DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2018.1489937
19. Johnston JC, Durieux-Smith A, Fitzpatrick E, O’Connor A, Benzies K, Angus D. An Assessment of Parents’ Decision-Making Regarding Paediatric Cochlear Implants. Can J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol. 2008;32(4):169-81.
20. Chang PF. Breaking the sound barrier: exploring parents' decision-making process of cochlear implants for their children. Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Aug;100(8):1544-1551. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.03.005
21. Kluwin TN, Stewart DA. Cochlear implants for younger children: a preliminary description of the parental decision process and outcomes. Am Ann Deaf. 2000 Mar;145(1):26-32. DOI: 10.1353/aad.2012.0247
22. Christiansen JB, Leigh IW. Cochlear Implants in Children: Ethics and Choices. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press; 2002.
23. Hyde M, Punch R, Komesaroff L. Coming to a decision about cochlear implantation: parents making choices for their deaf children. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2010 Spring;15(2):162-78. DOI: 10.1093/deafed/enq004
24. Ibrahim AM, El-Gilany AH, Mohamed EWA, Farrag NS. Perceived benefits of cochlear implants by parents: expectations, decision-making process, and barriers to care. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2023 Apr 4;98(1):7. DOI: 10.1186/s42506-023-00132-w
25. Ravi R, Gunjawate DR. Parent reported barriers and facilitators towards cochlear implantation - A systematic review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Sep;136:110163. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110163
26. Sorkin DL. Cochlear implantation in the world's largest medical device market: utilization and awareness of cochlear implants in the United States. Cochlear Implants Int. 2013 Mar;14 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S4-12. DOI: 10.1179/1467010013z.00000000076
27. Rosenstock IM. Historical Origins of the Health Belief Model. Health Educ Monogr. 1974;2(4):328–335. [DOI:10.1177/109019817400200403]
28. Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Kinnersley P, Cording E, Tomson D, Dodd C, Rollnick S, Edwards A, Barry M. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Oct;27(10):1361-7. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6
29. Zaidman-Zait A, Most T, Tarrasch R, Haddad E. Mothers' and fathers' involvement in intervention programs for deaf and hard of hearing children. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(11):1301-9. [DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1297491]
| Files | ||
| Issue | Articles in Press | |
| Section | Research Article(s) | |
| Keywords | ||
| Cochlear implants parental decision-making process financial constraints societal perceptions | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |



