Research Article

Comparison Between Persian Dynamic Spatial Quick Speech in Noise Test and Persian Hearing in Noise Test in Adults with Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Abstract

Background and Aim: Speech perception is severely impaired by sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and background noise. This study compared two newly developed Persian speech-in-noise tests, the Persian dynamic spatial quick speech in noise (P-DSQSIN) test and the Persian hearing in noise test (P-HINT), to evaluate the clinical utility of both in adults with SNHL.
Methods: Fifty subjects with moderate to moderately severe SNHL (aged 18–50) and twenty-five normal hearing (NH) subjects (aged 18–25) participated. They were assessed using both the P-DSQSIN and P-HINT. Additionally, the Persian spatial hearing questionnaire (P-SHQ) and the Persian speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (P-SSQ) were used to correlate objective test results with subjective perceptions of speech difficulties in noise.
Results: Significant differences (p<0.05) were found between the two groups across tests and questionnaires. The P-DSQSIN test demonstrated several advantages over P-HINT concerning clinical use, including setup complexity, ease of administration, and scoring. The results of the two tests showed a moderate positive correlation (r=0.693, p<0.001). In the SNHL group, the results revealed moderate significant positive correlations between the P-DSQSIN SNR loss and P-HINT SNR with the P-SHQ (r = 0.538, p < 0.001 and r=0.427, p =0.007) and P-SSQ questionnaire scores (r = 0.647, p < 0.001 and r = 0.348, p = 0.015).
Conclusion: Both tests assess the listener’s ability to hear in background noise. However, the P-DSQSIN test is a more sensitive measure of speech perception in noise than the P-HINT in subjects with SNHL.

1. Nureddini SZ, Mohammadzadeh A, Ashrafi M, Tabatabai SM, Jalilvand Karimi L. Recognition of stop consonants in babble noise in normal hearing individuals. Aud Vestib Res. 2015;24(1):31-7.
2. Ashrafi M, Baghban AA. Dynamic Spatial Auditory Processing in the Elderly. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024;76(4):3031-6. [DOI:10.1007/s12070-024-04581-3]
3. Razzaghipour A, Ashrafi M, Mansouri N et al. Comparison of Sustained and Selective Auditory Attention Between 8 - 11 Years Old Children with Cochlear Implant and Normal Children. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025;77:4863-70. [DOI:10.1007/s12070-025-05885-8]
4. Ashrafi M, Mohammadzadeh A. [Prevalence of auditory disorders in 3 to 6-year-old children in Tehran, Iran]. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2013;22(2):207-11. Persian.
5. Razzaghipour A, Ashrafi M, Mohammadzadeh A. A Review of Auditory Attention: Neural Mechanisms, Theories, and Affective Disorders. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024;76(3):2250-6. [DOI:10.1007/s12070-023-04373-1]
6. Ashrafi M, Rezaei Sakha M. Development of a Binaural Masking Level Differences Test Application Using Tonal and Speech Stimuli in Persian and Assessing Its Test-Retest Reliability in Normal-Hearing Young People. Aud Vestib Res. 2022;31(4):311-8. [DOI:10.18502/avr.v31i4.10736}
7. Bavandi A, Ashrafi M, Mohammadzadeh A. A Descriptive Study on the Effect of Music on Speech-in-Noise Perception in Binaural and Monaural Hearing Aid Users. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024;76(6):5176-82. [DOI:10.1007/s12070-024-04929-9]
8. Billings CJ, Olsen TM, Charney L, Madsen BM, Holmes CE. Speech-in-Noise Testing: An Introduction for Audiologists. Semin Hear. 2023;45(1):55-82. [DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1770155]
9. Nilsson M, Soli SD, Sullivan JA. Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 1994;95(2):1085-99. [DOI:10.1121/1.408469]
10. Sultan O, Elmahallawy TH, Kolkaila EA, Lasheen RM. Comparison between Quick Speech in Noise Test (QuickSIN test) and Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) in Adults with Sensorineural Hearing Loss. Egyptian Journal of Ear, Nose, Throat and Allied Sciences. 2020;21(3):176-85.‏ [DOI:10.21608/ejentas.2020.28080.1195]
11. Soli SD, Wong LL. Assessment of speech intelligibility in noise with the Hearing in Noise Test. Int J Audiol. 2008;47(6):356-61. [DOI:10.1080/14992020801895136]
12. Killion MC, Niquette PA, Gudmundsen GI, Revit LJ, Banerjee S. Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004;116(4 Pt 1):2395-405. [DOI:10.1121/1.1784440]
13. Shayanmehr S, Tahaei AA, Fatahi J, Jalaie S, Modarresi Y. Development, validity and reliability of Persian quick speech in noise test with steady noise. Aud Vestib Res. 2015;24(4):234-44.
14. Darouie A, Zamiri Abdollahi F, Joulaie M, Nik Nezhad S, Ahmadi T, Soli S. Development of the Farsi Hearing in Noise Test. Int J Audiol. 2020;59(2):148-52. [DOI:10.1080/14992027.2019.1671993]
15. Ashrafi M, Maharati F, Jafarzadeh Bejestani S, Akbarzadeh Baghban A. Development and Psychometric Evaluation of Persian Dynamic Spatial Quick Speech-in-Noise Test in Adults with Normal Hearing. Aud Vestib Res. 2022;31(1):30-7. [DOI:10.18502/avr.v31i1.8132]
16. de Andrade AN, Iorio MC, Gil D. Speech recognition in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;82(3):334-40. [DOI:10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.10.002]
17. Delphi M, Zamiri Abdolahi F, Tyler R, Bakhit M, Saki N, Nazeri AR. Validity and reliability of the Persian version of spatial hearing questionnaire. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2015; 29:231.
18. Lotfi Y, Nazeri AR, Asgari A, Moosavi A, Bakhshi E. Iranian Version of Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale: A Psychometric Study. Acta Med Iran. 2016;54(12):756-64.
19. Van Wilderode M, Van Humbeeck N, Krampe RT, van Wieringen A. Enhancing Speech Perception in Noise Through Home-Based Competing Talker Training. Ear Hear. 2025;46(4):856-70. [DOI:10.1097/AUD.0000000000001631]
20. ‏ Vermiglio AJ, Soli SD, Freed DJ, Fisher LM. The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index. J Am Acad Audiol. 2012;23(10):779-88. [DOI:10.3766/jaaa.23.10.4]
21. Reynard P, Lagacé J, Joly CA, Dodelé L, Veuillet E, Thai-Van H. Speech-in-Noise Audiometry in Adults: A Review of the Available Tests for French Speakers. Audiol Neurootol. 2022;27(3):185-199. [DOI:10.1159/000518968]
22. Mcardle R, Wilson RH. Speech Perception in Noise: The Basics. Perspectives on Hearing and Hearing Disorders: Research and Diagnostics. 2009;13(1):4-13.
23. Duncan KR, Aarts NL. A Comparison of the HINT and Quick SIN Tests. Comparaison entre les tests HINT et Quick SIN. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology. 2006;30(2):86-94.
24. Essawy WM, Kolkaila EA, Kabbash IA, Emara AA. Development and standardization of new hearing in noise test in Arabic language. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;5(6):1501-6. [DOI:10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20194917]
25. Wilson RH, McArdle RA, Smith SL. An Evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN Materials on Listeners With Normal Hearing and Listeners With Hearing Loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007;50(4):844-56. [DOI:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/059)]
26. Grant KW, Walden TC. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners. J Am Acad Audiol. 2013;24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. [DOI:10.3766/jaaa.24.4.3]
Files
IssueArticles in Press QRcode
SectionResearch Article(s)
Keywords
Sensorineural hearing loss dynamic spatial processing quick speech in noise test hearing in noise test
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Jahangard A, Mohammadzadeh A. Comparison Between Persian Dynamic Spatial Quick Speech in Noise Test and Persian Hearing in Noise Test in Adults with Sensorineural Hearing Loss. Aud Vestib Res. 2026;.