Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Tinnitus Acceptance Questionnaire and Its Correlation with Psychoacoustic Parameters in Patients with Chronic Subjective Tinnitus
,
Abstract
Background and Aim: Acceptance of tinnitus may influence the perceived intensity and the distress it causes. The Tinnitus Acceptance Questionnaire (TAQ) is a useful tool for assessing tinnitus acceptance. This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Persian version of the TAQ (P-TAQ) and determine the correlation of its scores with psychoacoustic measures in patients with chronic tinnitus.
Methods: After translation and confirming face validity, 85 patients with chronic tinnitus completed the P-TAQ, along with the Persian versions of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI). To determine the reliability, the P-TAQ was completed by 30 patients after two weeks. Psychoacoustic parameters including pitch matching, loudness matching, and Minimum Masking Level (MML) were measured for all patients.
Results: The P-TAQ had high face validity. The internal consistency was confirmed using Cronbach’s alpha (α=0.92). The interclass correlation coefficient (0.994) confirmed reliability. A strong negative correlation was found between the total P-TAQ score and total THI score (p<0.001, r=–0.788), and the scores of the HADS subscales of anxiety (p<0.001, r=–0.623) and depression (p<0.001, r=–0.728). The total P-TAQ score showed a weak negative correlation with tinnitus loudness (p=0.003, r=–0.322) and PTA of both ears (r=–0.223, p=0.040). There was no significant correlation between the total P-TAQ score and the factors of age, tinnitus duration, tinnitus pitch, or MML.
Conclusion: The P-TAQ has excellent validity and reliability. Therefore, it can be used to assess tinnitus acceptance among Persian-speaking patients with chronic tinnitus.
2. Henry JA, Dennis KC, Schechter MA. General review of tinnitus: prevalence, mechanisms, effects, and management. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005;48(5):1204-35. [DOI:10.1044/1092-4388(2005/084)]
3. Eggermont JJ, Roberts LE. The neuroscience of tinnitus. Trends Neurosci. 2004;27(11):676-82. [DOI:10.1016/j.tins.2004.08.010]
4. Jastreboff PJ. Tinnitus retraining therapy. Prog Brain Res. 2007;166:415-23. [DOI:10.1016/S0079-6123(07)66040-3]
5. Hesser H, Weise C, Westin VZ, Andersson G. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of cognitive-behavioral therapy for tinnitus distress. Clin Psychol Rev. 2011;31(4):545-53. [DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.12.006]
6. Moschen R, Fioretti A, Eibenstein A, Natalini E, Chiarella G, Viola P, et al. Validation of the Chronic Tinnitus Acceptance Questionnaire (CTAQ-I): the Italian version. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2019;39(2):107-16. [DOI:10.14639/0392-100X-2144]
7. Hayes SC, Luoma JB, Bond FW, Masuda A, Lillis J. Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes. Behav Res Ther. 2006;44(1):1-25. [DOI:10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006]
8. Fowler EP, Fowler Jr EP. Somatopsychic and psychosomatic factors in tinnitus, deafness and vertigo. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1955;64(1):29-37. [DOI:10.1177/000348945506400106]
9. Hallam RS, Rachman S, Hinchcliffe R. Psychological aspects of tinnitus. In: Rachman R, editor. Contributions to Medical Psychology. Vol. 3. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1984. p. 31-53.
10. Hesser H, Bånkestad E, Andersson G. Acceptance of Tinnitus as an Independent Correlate of Tinnitus Severity. Ear Hear. 2015;36(4):e176-82. [DOI:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000148]
11. Weise C, Kleinstäuber M, Hesser H, Westin VZ, Andersson G. Acceptance of tinnitus: validation of the tinnitus acceptance questionnaire. Cogn Behav Ther. 2013;42(2):100-15. [DOI:10.1080/16506073.2013.781670]
12. Henry JA. “Measurement” of Tinnitus. Otol Neurotol. 2016;37(8):e276-85. [DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000001070]
13. Tyler RS, Conrad-Armes D. The determination of tinnitus loudness considering the effects of recruitment. J Speech Hear Res. 1983;26(1):59-72. [DOI:10.1044/jshr.2601.59]
14. Jun HJ, Yoo IW, Hwang SJ, Hwang SY. Validation of a Korean Version of the Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;8(3):198-201. [DOI:10.3342/ceo.2015.8.3.198]
15. Henry JA, Meikle MB. Psychoacoustic measures of tinnitus. J Am Acad Audiol. 2000;11(3):138-55. [DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1748040]
16. Scott B, Lindberg P. Psychological profile and somatic complaints between help-seeking and non-help-seeking tinnitus subjects. Psychosomatics. 2000;41(4):347-52. [DOI:10.1176/appi.psy.41.4.347]
17. Manning C, Thielman EJ, Grush L, Henry JA. Perception Versus Reaction: Comparison of Tinnitus Psychoacoustic Measures and Tinnitus Functional Index Scores. Am J Audiol. 2019;28(1S):174-80. [DOI:10.1044/2018_AJA-TTR17-18-0041]
18. Newman CW, Sandridge SA, Snow JB. Tinnitus questionnaires. In: Snow JB, editor. Tinnitus: Theory and Management. Hamilton: BC Decker; 2004. p. 237-54.
19. Meikle MB, Stewart BJ, Griest SE, Henry JA. Tinnitus outcomes assessment. Trends Amplif. 2008;12(3):223-35. [DOI:10.1177/1084713808319943]
20. Westin V, Hayes SC, Andersson G. Is it the sound or your relationship to it? The role of acceptance in predicting tinnitus impact. Behav Res Ther. 2008;46(12):1259-65. [DOI:10.1016/j.brat.2008.08.008]
21. Aaronson NK, Acquadro C, Alonso J, Apolone G, Bucquet D, Bullinger M, et al. International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. Qual Life Res. 1992;1(5):349-51. [DOI:10.1007/BF00434949]
22. Sharafi MA, Farahani S, Hoseinabadi R, Zamiri Abdollahi F, Jalaie S, Etemadi M. The relation among tinnitus distress, psychoacoustic parameters and anxiety state in hearing-impaired patients with chronic tinnitus: a pilot study. Aud Vestib Res. 2020;29(2):85-92. [DOI:10.18502/avr.v29i2.2789]
23. Mahmoudian S, Shahmiri E, Rouzbahani M, Jafari Z, Keyhani M, Rahimi F, et al. Persian language version of the “Tinnitus Handicap Inventory”: translation, standardization, validity and reliability. Int Tinnitus J. 2011;16(2):93-103.
24. Montazeri A, Vahdaninia M, Ebrahimi M, Jarvandi S. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:14. [DOI:10.1186/1477-7525-1-14]
25. Kleinstäuber M, Jasper K, Schweda I, Hiller W, Andersson G, Weise C. The role of fear-avoidance cognitions and behaviors in patients with chronic tinnitus. Cogn Behav Ther. 2013;42(2):84-99. [DOI:10.1080/16506073.2012.717301]
26. Moon KR, Park S, Jung Y, Lee A, Lee JH. Effects of Anxiety Sensitivity and Hearing Loss on Tinnitus Symptom Severity. Psychiatry Investig. 2018;15(1):34-40. [DOI:10.4306/pi.2018.15.1.34]
27. Takabatake S, Takahashi M, Kabaya K, Sekiya Y, Sekiya K, Harata I, et al. Validation of the Tinnitus Acceptance Questionnaire: Japanese Version. Audiol Res. 2022;12(1):66-76. [DOI:10.3390/audiolres12010006]
28. Zöger S, Svedlund J, Holgers KM. Relationship between tinnitus severity and psychiatric disorders. Psychosomatics. 2006;47(4):282-8. [DOI:10.1176/appi.psy.47.4.282]
29. Hesser H, Andersson G. The role of anxiety sensitivity and behavioral avoidance in tinnitus disability. Int J Audiol. 2009;48(5):295-9. [DOI:10.1080/14992020802635325]
30. Searchfield GD, Jerram C, Wise K, Raymond S. The Impact of Hearing Loss on Tinnitus Severity. Aust N Z J Audiol. 2007;29(2):67-76.
31. Hiller W, Goebel G. When tinnitus loudness and annoyance are discrepant: audiological characteristics and psychological profile. Audiol Neurootol. 2007;12(6):391-400. [DOI:10.1159/000106482]
32. Hiller W, Goebel G. Factors influencing tinnitus loudness and annoyance. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;132(12):1323-30. [DOI:10.1001/archotol.132.12.1323]
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 34 No 2 (2025) | |
| Section | Research Article(s) | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/avr.v34i2.18053 | |
| Keywords | ||
| Acceptance tinnitus tinnitus annoyance tinnitus acceptance questionnaire | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
