Research Article

Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version of the Tinnitus and Hearing Survey Questionnaire

Abstract

Background and Aim: Hearing loss often coexists with various comorbidities and is commonly accompanied by tinnitus. Patients frequently report both tinnitus and hearing difficulties, posing challenges in distinguishing between the two complaints. This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Tinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) for distinguishing between tinnitus and hearing problems.
Methods: A psychometric study involved 100 participants aged 18–60, categorized into four groups based on hearing status and tinnitus presence. The Persian translation of a questionnaire underwent content and face validity assessments. Convergent validity for tinnitus and sound tolerance sections was evaluated using the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) and Hyperacusis Questionnaire (HQ) respectively, while pure-tone average assessed hearing section validity. Construct validity was confirmed via confirmatory factor analysis, and internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed using Cronbach’s alpha and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) respectively.
Results: The Persian version had strong face and content validity, with Cronbach’s alpha values of 0.82 for tinnitus, 0.90 for hearing, and 0.80 overall. The ICC values for the tinnitus, hearing, and sound tolerance sections were 0.8, 0.83, and 0.82. Convergent validity using the THI and HQ scores were reported 0.76 and 0.6, and the correlation value of the THS score with the PTA was 0.82. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed a good 2-factor structure of the THS.
Conclusion: The Persian THS is a valid and reliable tool for separating tinnitus from hearing problems in Persian-speaking people.

1. Han BI, Lee HW, Kim TY, Lim JS, Shin KS. Tinnitus: characteristics, causes, mechanisms, and treatments. J Clin Neurol. 2009;5(1):11-9. [DOI:10.3988/jcn.2009.5.1.11]
2. Helfer TM. Noise-induced hearing injuries, active component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2007-2010. MSMR. 2011 Jun;18(6):7-10.
3. Tunkel DE, Bauer CA, Sun GH, Rosenfeld RM, Chandrasekhar SS, Cunningham ER Jr, et al. Clinical practice guideline: tinnitus. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;151(2 Suppl):S1-40. [DOI:10.1177/0194599814545325]
4. Sanchez TG, Medeiros IR, Levy CP, Ramalho Jda R, Bento RF. Tinnitus in normally hearing patients: clinical aspects and repercussions. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2005;71(4):427-31. [DOI:10.1016/s1808-8694(15)31194-0]
5. Cantley LF, Galusha D, Cullen MR, Dixon-Ernst C, Tessier-Sherman B, Slade MD, et al. Does tinnitus, hearing asymmetry, or hearing loss predispose to occupational injury risk? Int J Audiol. 2015;54 Suppl 1(01):S30-6.
6. Coles RR. Classification of causes, mechanisms of patient disturbance, and associated counseling. Mechanisms of Tinnitus. 1995;75:1225-37.
7. Henry JA, Griest S, Zaugg TL, Thielman E, Kaelin C, Galvez G, et al. Tinnitus and hearing survey: a screening tool to differentiate bothersome tinnitus from hearing difficulties. Am J Audiol. 2015;24(1):66-77. [DOI:10.1044/2014_AJA-14-0042]
8. Ware JE Jr, Keller SD, Gandek B, Brazier JE, Sullivan M. Evaluating translations of health status questionnaires. Methods from the IQOLA project. International Quality of Life Assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1995;11(3):525-51. [DOI:10.1017/s0266462300008710]
9. Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res. 1986;35(6):382-5.
10. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel psychology. 1975;28(4):563-75.
11. Almanasreh E, Moles R, Chen TF. Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019;15(2):214-21. [DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.066]
12. Humes LE. The World Health Organization’s hearing-impairment grading system: an evaluation for unaided communication in age-related hearing loss. Int J Audiol. 2019;58(1):12-20.
13. Mahmoudian S, Shahmiri E, Rouzbahani M, Jafari Z, Keyhani M, Rahimi F, et al. Persian language version of the “Tinnitus Handicap Inventory”: translation, standardization, validity and reliability. Int Tinnitus J. 2011;16(2):93-103.
14. Newman CW, Jacobson GP, Spitzer JB. Development of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122(2):143-8. [DOI:10.1001/archotol.1996.01890140029007]
15. Javanbakht M, Seddigh-Hamidi P, Vahedi M. Persian Version of the Hyperacusis Questionnaire: The Translation Process, Psychometric Properties, and Diagnostic Criteria in Normal Hearing People. Iranian Rehabilitation Journal. 2023;21(1):65-72. [DOI:10.32598/irj.21.1.1492.1]
16. Khalfa S, Dubal S, Veuillet E, Perez-Diaz F, Jouvent R, Collet L. Psychometric normalization of a hyperacusis questionnaire. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2002;64(6):436-42. [DOI:10.1159/000067570]
17. McDonald RP, Ho MH. Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychol Methods. 2002;7(1):64-82. [DOI:10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.64]
18. Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 5th ed. New York: Guilford Publications; 2023.
19. Byrne BM. Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and EQS/WINDOWS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. New York: SAGE Publications; 1994.
20. Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990;107(2):238-46. [DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238]
21. Raj-Koziak D, Gos E, Rajchel J, Piłka A, Skarżyński H, Rostkowska J, et al. Tinnitus and Hearing Survey: A Polish Study of Validity and Reliability in a Clinical Population. Audiol Neurootol. 2017;22(4-5):197-204. [DOI:10.1159/000481338]
22. Scheffer AR, Ferreira MC, Mondelli MFCG. The applicability of the Tinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) in the differentiation of tinnitus and hearing complaints. Codas. 2021;33(3):e20200016. [DOI:10.1590/2317-1782/20202020016]
23. Newman CW, Sandridge SA, Jacobson GP. Assessing outcomes of tinnitus intervention. J Am Acad Audiol. 2014;25(1):76-105. [DOI:10.3766/jaaa.25.1.6]
Files
IssueVol 34 No 1 (2025) QRcode
SectionResearch Article(s)
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/avr.v34i1.17266
Keywords
Surveys and questionnaires tinnitus and hearing validity reliability
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Alavi Dehkordi SA, Ramezani M, Javanbakht M, Vahedi M. Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version of the Tinnitus and Hearing Survey Questionnaire. Aud Vestib Res. 2024;34(1):9-15.