Research Article

Acoustic Analysis of Fricatives /s/ and /ʃ/ and Affricate /ʧ/ in Persian-Speaking Cochlear-Implanted Children and Normal-Hearing Peers

Abstract

Background and Aim: Hearing-impaired individuals have difficulty comprehending and producing speech sounds. Cochlear implantation is used to augment hearing. The present study aims to compare the production of fricatives /s/ and /ʃ/ and affricate /ʧ/ by Persianspeaking Cochlear-Implanted (CI) and Normal-Hearing (NH) children.
Methods: Fifteen Persian-speaking NH children and 15 Persian-speaking CI children, matched for age, gender, and general health conditions, were included in the study. The stimuli included two voiceless Persian fricatives /s/ and /ʃ/ and one voiceless Persian affricate /ʧ/ along with the open front vowel /æ/ in three Consonant-Vowel (CV), Consonant-Vowel-Consonant (CVC), and Vowel-Consonant (VC) contexts (/sæ/, /æsæ/, /æs/, /ʃæ/, /æʃæ/, /æʃ/, /ʧæ/, /æʧæ/, /æʧ/). After recording all utterances, Praat software was used to measure the friction duration, rise time, and spectral peak of the consonants.
Results: The CI children could not distinguish between /ʃ/ and /ʧ/ and produced affricate /ʧ/ as an allophone of /ʃ/ (p=0.01). Moreover, distinguishing between two fricatives /s/ and /ʃ/ was difficult for both groups. While NH children slightly treated these two sounds differently, the CI group produced fricative /s/ as an allophone of /ʃ/ (p=0.02). The rise time of /ʃ/ was longer in the NH children, except for /ʧæ/, where the CI children had a longer rise time.
Conclusion: The speech of CI children is different in producing /s/, /ʃ/, and /ʧ/ from their NH peers. The results can help speech therapists, clinical linguists, and application designers focus on speech sounds that are challenging for CI children to produce.

1. World Health Organization. Deafness and hearing loss. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/hearing-loss#tab=tab_1
2. Tseng SC, Kuei K, Tsou PC. Acoustic characteristics of vowels and plosives/affricates of Mandarin-speaking hearingimpaired children. Clin Linguist Phon. 2011;25(9):784-803. [DOI:10.3109/02699206.2011.565906]
3. Farahani Tajar M, Fattahi Masroor F, Honari H. Drafting a Strategic Plan for the Deaf Sports Federation in Islamic Republic of Iran. Strategic Studies on Youth and Sports. 2020;18(46):99-122. Persian.
4. Finitzo T, Crumley WG. The role of the pediatrician in hearing loss. From detection to connection. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1999;46(1):15-34, ix-x. [DOI:10.1016/s0031-3955(05)70078-x]
5. Zadeh MH, Selesnick SH. Evaluation of hearing impairment. Compr Ther. 2001;27(4):302-10. [DOI:10.1007/s12019-001-0028-y]
6. Serry TA, Blamey PJ. A 4-year investigation into phonetic inventory development in young cochlear implant users. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1999;42(1):141-54. [DOI:10.1044/jslhr.4201.141]
7. Osberger MJ, Maso M, Sam LK. Speech intelligibility of children with cochlear implants, tactile aids, or hearing aids. J Speech Hear Res. 1993;36(1):186-203. [DOI:10.1044/jshr.3601.186]
8. Warner-Czyz AD, Davis BL, MacNeilage PF. Accuracy of consonant-vowel syllables in young cochlear implant recipients and hearing children in the single-word period. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010;53(1):2-17. [DOI:10.1044/1092-4388(2009/0163)]
9. Chin SB. Aspects of Stop Consonant Production by Pediatric Users of Cochlear Implants. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2002;33(1):38-51. [DOI:10.1044/0161-1461(2002/004)]
10. Boyce SE. The articulatory phonetics of /r/ for residual speech errors. Semin Speech Lang. 2015;36(4):257-70. [DOI:10.1055/s-0035-1562909]
11. Uchanski RM, Geers AE. Acoustic characteristics of the speech of young cochlear implant users: a comparison with normal-hearing age-mates. Ear Hear. 2003;24(1 Suppl):90-105S. [DOI:10.1097/01.AUD.0000051744.24290.C1]
12. Peng SC, Tomblin JB, Cheung H, Lin YS, Wang LS. Perception and production of mandarin tones in prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 2004;25(3):251-64. [DOI:10.1097/01.aud.0000130797.73809.40]
13. Reidy PF, Kristensen K, Winn MB, Litovsky RY, Edwards JR. The acoustics of word-ınitial fricatives and their effect on word-level ıntelligibility in children with bilateral cochlear ımplants. Ear Hear. 2017;38(1):42-56. [DOİ:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000349]
14. Sohrabi M, Jalilevand N. Consonant production skills in children with cochlear ımplants and normal-hearing children aged 3–5 years. Aud Vestib Res. 2022;31(2): 98-103. [DOI:10.18502/avr.v31i2.9114]
15. Bernhard N, Gauger U, Romo Ventura E, Uecker FC, Olze H, Knopke S, et al. Duration of deafness impacts auditory performance after cochlear implantation: A meta-analysis. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2021;6(2):291-301. [DOI:10.1002/lio2.528]
16. Kent RD, Kin Y. Acoustic Analysis of Speech. In: Ball MJ, Perkins MR, Müller N, Howard S, editors. The Handbook of Clinical Linguistics. 1st ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008. p. 360-80.
17. Johnson K. Acoustic and auditory phonetics. Phonetica. 2004;61(1):56-8. [DOI:10.1159/000078663]
18. Jongman A, Wayland R, Wong S. Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000;108(3 Pt 1):1252-63. [DOI:10.1121/1.1288413]
19. Boersma P. Praat: a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot Int. 2001;5(9):341-5.
20. Whitehead RL, Barefoot SM. Airflow characteristics of fricative consonants produced by normally hearing and hearing-impaired speakers. J Speech Hear Res. 1983;26(2):185-94. [DOI:10.1044/jshr.2602.185]
21. Liker M, Mildner V, Sindija B. Acoustic analysis of the speech of children with cochlear implants: a longitudinal study. Clin Linguist Phon. 2007;21(1):1-11. [DOI:10.1080/02699200400026991]
22. Mildner V, Liker M. Fricatives, affricates, and vowels in Croatian children with cochlear implants. Clin Linguist Phon. 2008;22(10-11):845-56. [DOI:10.1080/02699200802130557]
23. Reetz H, Jongman A. Phonetics: Transcription, production, acoustics, and perception. 2nd ed. Malden: John Wiley & Sons; 2020.
24. Wayland R. Phonetics: A Practical Introduction. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2018.
25. Ingvalson EM, Young NM, Wong PC. Auditory–cognitive training improves language performance in prelingually deafened cochlear implant recipients. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. 2014;78(10):1624-31. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.07.009]
26. Yang J, Vadlamudi J, Yin Z, Lee CY, Xu L. Production of wordinitial fricatives of Mandarin Chinese in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017;19(2):153-64. [DOI:10.3109/17549507.2016.1143972]
27. Yang J, Xu L. Acoustic characteristics of sibilant fricatives and affricates in Mandarin-speaking children with cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am. 2023;153(6):3501-12. [DOI:10.1121/10.0019803]
28. Todd AE, Edwards JR, Litovsky RY. Production of contrast between sibilant fricatives by children with cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011;130(6):3969-79. [DOI:10.1121/1.3652852]
Files
IssueVol 33 No 3 (2024) QRcode
SectionResearch Article(s)
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/avr.v33i3.15504
Keywords
Cochlear implant speech production fricatives affricate

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Roohparvar R, Karimabadi M, Ghahari S, Mirzaee M. Acoustic Analysis of Fricatives /s/ and /ʃ/ and Affricate /ʧ/ in Persian-Speaking Cochlear-Implanted Children and Normal-Hearing Peers. Aud Vestib Res. 2024;33(3):227-234.