Research Article

The effects of bilingualism on auditory memory using Persian version of dichotic auditory-verbal memory test


Background and Aim: Today, Bilingualism is a developing phenomenon which half of the world population is bilingual. Auditory system is the main route to language learning, so it is expected that bilingualism has an effect on functions of the auditory system. Auditory memory is one of the auditory processes which is a cornerstone of linguistic skills and learning process growth, so that, it has an important role in language learning. In this paper, functions of the auditory memory in monolinguals and precocious bilinguals have been investigated through dichotic auditory-verbal memory test.
Methods: A cross sectional-contrastive study of the Persian version of dichotic auditory-verbal memory test has been carried out among 30 monolingual and 30 bilingual persons. The participants were chosen from both sexes in the age range of 18-30, and test scores have been compared in both groups and sexes.
Results: Mean score of dichotic auditory-verbal memory test in monolinguals was 5.47 (from 10), with a standard deviant of 0.55, and in bilinguals were 7.52, with a standard deviant of 0.90, which statistically, it showed a significant difference in scores between the two groups (p<0.001). There was no significant difference among men and women’s scores in monolingual (p=0.06) and bilingual (p=0.10) groups.
Conclusion: Results of this limited research showed that there was a considerable functional difference between monolinguals and bilinguals in dichotic auditory-verbal memory test. Therefore, it seems precocious bilingualism has a positive effect on the auditory memory.

1. Martin-Rhee MM, Bialystok E. The development of two types of inhibitory control in monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. 2008;11(1):81-93.
2. Steinberg DD, Sciarini NV. An introduction to psycholinguistics. 2nd ed. New York: Taylor & Francis; 2006.
3. Rogers CL, Lister JJ, Febo DM, Besing JM, Abrams HB. Effects of bilingualism, noise, and reverberation on speech perception by listeners with normal hearing. Applied Psycholinguistics. 2006; 27(3):465-85.
4. Onoda RM, Pereira LD, Guilherme A. Temporal processing and dichotic listening in bilingual and non-bilingual descendants. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;72(6):737-46.
5. Ressel V, Pallier C, Venturas-Campos N, Díaz B, Roessler A, Ávila C, et al. An effect of bilingualism on the auditory cortex. J Neurosci. 2012;32(47):16597-601.
6. Francis WS, Gutiérrez M. Bilingual recognition memory: stronger performance but weaker levels-of-processing effects in the less fluent language. Mem Cognit. 2012;40(3):496-503.
7. Cusimano A. Learning disabilities: there is a cure--a guide for parents, educators and physicians. 1st ed. Lansdale, PA: Achieve Publications; 2002.
8. Parsaie S, Kiani S, Azad Farsani Y. Comparison between working memory and academic performance in bilingual and monolingual boy students. Journal of Psychology. 2013;17(1):104-19. Persian.
9. Schroeder SR, Marian V. A bilingual advantage for episodic memory in older adults. J Cogn Psychol (Hove). 2012;24(5):591-601.
10. Yoo J, Kaushanskaya M. Phonological memory in bilinguals and monolinguals. Mem Cognit. 2012;40(8):1314-30.
11. Krizman J, Marian V, Shook A, Skoe E, Kraus N. Subcortical encoding of sound is enhanced in bilinguals and relates to executive function advantages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(20):7877-81.
12. Bak TH, Vega-Mendoza M, Sorace S. Never too late? An advantage on tests of auditory attention extends to late bilinguals. Front Psychol. 2014;5:485.
13. Jalilvand-Karimi L, Motlaghzadeh L, Mohammadkhani Gh, Akbarzadeh Baghban A. The comparison of auditory capacity between bilinguals and monolinguals by consonant-vowel dichotic test. J Rehab Med. 2013;2(3):19-30. Persian.
14. Aghamollaei M, Tahaei SA, Jafari Z, Toufan R, Keyhani MR. Development and evaluation of the Persian version of the dichotic auditory-verbal memory test in 18-to 25-year old normal individuals. Audiol. 2011;20(2).86-94. Persian.
15. Chun MM, Turk-Browne NB. The cognitive benefits of being bilingual. Cerebrum. 2012:13.
16. Chun MM, Turk-Browne NB. Interactions between attention and memory. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2007;17(2):177-84.
17. Smith EE, Jonides J. Storage and executive processes in the frontal lobes. Science. 1999;283(5408):1657-61.
18. Goldstein JM, Jerram M, Poldrack R, Anagnoson R, Breiter HC, Makris N. Sex differences in prefrontal cortical brain activity during fMRI of audiology verbal working memory. Neuropsychology. 2005;19(4):509-19.
19. Hugdahl K, Asbjørnsen A, Wester K. Memory performance in Parkinson's disease. Cogn Behav Neurol. 1993;6(3):170-6.
20. Aghamolaie M, Jafari Z, Tahaie SAA, Toufan R, Keyhani MR. The effect of gender on the results of the Persian version of dichotic auditory-verbal memory test. Advances in Cognitive Science. 2010;12(1):70-6. Persian.
IssueVol 24 No 3 (2015) QRcode
SectionResearch Article(s)
Auditory-verbal memory bilingualism short term memory

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Soleymani M, Jarollahi F, Hosseini AF, Rahmani E. The effects of bilingualism on auditory memory using Persian version of dichotic auditory-verbal memory test. Aud Vestib Res. 2015;24(3):128-133.