Research Article

Comparison of auditory reaction time in noise and quiet in tinnitus subjects


Background and Aim: Tinnitus is perception of sound in absence of external source. Reaction time is the time between sensory stimuli and a behavior. Alternation of auditory reaction time has been shown in the literature in patients with tinnitus. This study has investigated the auditory reaction time in quiet and noise to different frequencies.
Methods: Fifteen subjects with chronic tinnitus participated in this study. Basic auditory test and tinnitus evaluations were carried out. In order to measure auditory reaction time, the participants were instructed to press a button after hearing the target sound. Xnote Stopwatch software measured reaction times and data were collected.
Results: Auditory reaction time to the tinnitus frequency stimulus decreases significantly (p<0.05) in tinnitus subjects in both quiet and noise conditions. This alternation is significantly different in noise compared to the quiet condition (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Based on the results, noise can reduce auditory reaction time significantly. Also, alternation of auditory reaction time to the tinnitus frequency –especially in noise –ould suggest different central processing of the tinnitus frequency in tinnitus subjects. 

1. Adjamian P, Sereda M, Hall DA. The mechanisms of tinnitus: perspectives from human functional neuro¬imaging. Hear Res. 2009;253(1-2):15-31.
2. Stouffer JL, Tyler RS. Characterization of tinnitus by tinnitus patients. J Speech Hear Disord. 1990;55(3):439-53.
3. Møller AR. Tinnitus: presence and future. Prog Brain Res. 2007;166:3-16.
4. Davis A, El Refaie A. Epidemiology of tinnitus. In: Tyler RS, editor. Tinnitus handbook. 1st ed. New York: Cengage Learning; 2000. p. 1-24.
5. Dalton DS, Cruickshanks KJ, Klein BE, Klein R, Wiley TL, Nondahl DM. The impact of hearing loss on quality of life in older adults. Gerontologist. 2003;43(5):661-8.
6. Bartels H, Middel BL, van der Laan BF, Staal MJ, Albers FW. The additive effect of co-occurring anxiety and depression on health status, quality of life and coping strategies in help-seeking tinnitus sufferers. Ear Hear. 2008;29(6):947-56.
7. Husain FT, Akrofi K, Carpenter-Thompson JR, Schmidt SA. Alterations to the attention system in adults with tinnitus are modality specific. Brain Res. 2015;1620:81-97.
8. Wan Suhailah WH, Mohd Normani Z, Nik Adilah NO, Azizah O, Aw CL, Zuraida Z. The effectiveness of psychological interventions among tinnitus sufferers: A review. Med J Malaysia. 2015;70(3):188-97.
9. Roberts LE, Husain FT, Eggermont JJ. Role of attention in the generation and modulation of tinnitus. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37(8):1754-73.
10. Bernal B, Altman NR. Auditory functional MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176(4):1009-15.
11. Araneda R, De Volder AG, Deggouj N, Philippot P, Heeren A, Lacroix E, et al. Altered top-down cognitive control and auditory processing in tinnitus: evidences from auditory and visual spatial stroop. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2015;33(1):67-80.
12. Meikle MB, Henry JA, Griest SE, Stewart BJ, Abrams HB, McArdle R, et al. The tinnitus functional index: development of a new clinical measure for chronic, intrusive tinnitus. Ear Hear. 2012;33(2):153-76.
13. Craik FI. The role of cognition in age-related hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol. 2007;18(7):539-47.
14. Lockwood AH, Wack DS, Burkard RF, Coad ML, Reyes SA, Arnold SA, et al. The functional anatomy
of gaze-evoked tinnitus and sustained lateral gaze. Neurology. 2001;56(4):472-80.
15. Dornhoffer J, Danner C, Mennemeier M, Blake D, Garcia-Rill E. Arousal and attention deficits in patients with tinnitus. Int Tinnitus J. 2006;12(1):9-16.
16. Pfingst BE, Hienz R, Kimm J, Miller J. Reaction-time procedure for measurement of hearing. I. Suprathreshold functions. J Acoust Soc Am. 1975;57(2):421-30.
17. Pfingst BE, Hienz R, Miller J. Reaction-time procedure for measurement of hearing. II. Threshold functions. J Acoust Soc Am. 1975;57(2):431-6.
18. Vernon J. The loudness of tinnitus. Hear Speech Action. 1976;44:17-9.
19. Goodwin PE, Johnson RM. A comparison of reaction times to tinnitus and nontinnitus frequencies. Ear Hear. 1980;1(3):148-55.
20. Fletcher H, Munson WA. Loudness, its definition, measurement and calculation. Bell System Technical Journal. 1933;12(4):377-430.
21. Adel Ghahraman M. Noise and tinnitus. Audiol. 1999;7(1):64-70. Persian.
22. Mahmoudian S, Shahmiri E, Rouzbahani M, Jafari Z, Keyhani M, Rahimi F, et al. Persian language version of the "Tinnitus Handicap Inventory": translation, stan¬dardization, validity and reliability. Int Tinnitus J. 2011;16(2):93-103.
23. Heidari M, Mahdavi ME, Heidari F, Akbarzadeh Baghban A. Auditory recognition of Persian digits in multi-talker babble noise: a preliminary study. Aud Vest Res. 2015;24(3):134-40.
24. Ahmadi A, Fatahi J, Keshani A, Jalilvand H, Modarresi Y, Jalaie S. Developing and evaluating the reliability of acceptable noise level test in Persian language. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2015;4(2):109-17. Persian.
25. McShane DP, Hyde ML, Alberti PW. Tinnitus pre¬valence in industrial hearing loss compensation clai¬mants. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1988;13(5):323-30.
26. Salvi RJ, Ahroon WA. Tinnitus and neural activity. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1983;26(4):629-32.
27. Saha S, Gandhi A, Das S, Kaur P, Singh SH. Effect of noise stress on some cardiovascular parameters and audiovisual reaction time. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 1996;40(1):35-40.
IssueVol 25 No 3 (2016) QRcode
SectionResearch Article(s)
Auditory reaction time noise tinnitus

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Ranjbar N, Tahaei AA, Ashayeri H, Kamali M, Arefi HN. Comparison of auditory reaction time in noise and quiet in tinnitus subjects. Aud Vestib Res. 2016;25(3):153-158.