Normative variation of auditory stream segregation in adults

  • Fatemeh Moghadasi Boroujeni Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Masoumeh Rouzbahani Mail Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Fatemeh Heidari Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Mohammad Kamali Department of Basic Sciences, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Keywords:
Auditory stream segregation, fission boundary, attention, auditory object, auditory cortex

Abstract

Background and Aim: Human beings receive a variety of sounds in their everyday lives. These sounds are generated by different sources, and are heard simultaneously or with a small time sequence. A characteristic of the auditory system is its ability to analyze complex sounds, and to make decisions about the source of each constituent part of these sounds. The present study intends to assess normative variation of auditory stream segregation in adults.
Methods: This study has a cross-sectional design and was conducted on 40 normal adults with the age range of 18 to 35. Stimuli were presented in the form of pure tones A and B as ABA-ABA triplet pattern at the intensity level of 40 dBSL. The A tone frequency was selected as the basis at 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz. The B tone was presented with a difference of half to twelve and half semitones above the basis tone frequency in each phase.
Results: The fission boundary (FB) threshold was obtained in 500-2000 Hz. FB threshold was better in low frequencies than high frequencies. FB thresholds were independent of frequency when expressed as equivalent rectangular bandwidth (ERB).
Conclusion: Fission boundary threshold increased with the increase of frequency. When we used ERB, FB threshold was independent of frequency.

References

1. Bidet-Caulet A, Bertrand O. Neurophysiological mecha¬nisms involved in auditory perceptual organization. Front Neurosci. 2009;3(2):182-91.
2. Bregman AS. Auditory scene analysis: the perceptual organization of sound. 1st ed. Cambrige: MIT press; 1990 (Paperback, 1994).
3. Noda T, Kanzaki R, Takahashi H. Substructure of func¬tional network in auditory cortex for stream segregation. Neurosci Res. 2011;71 Suppl:e355.
4. Talebi H. A look at the auditory scene analysis from the window of event related potentials. Aud Vest Res. 2015;24(3):110-9.
5. Bizley JK, Cohen YE. The what, where and how of auditory-object perception. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013;14(10):693-707.
6. Noda T, Takahashi H, Kanzaki R. Neural correlates of auditory stream segregation –Stimulus-onset synchrony within the auditory cortex–. Neurosci Res. 2010;68 Suppl 1:e273.
7. Rose MM, Moore BC. Effects of frequency and level on auditory stream segregation. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000;108(3 Pt 1):1209-14.
8. Mill RW, Bőhm TM, Bendixen A, Winkler I, Denham SL. Modelling the emergence and dynamics of percep¬tual organisation in auditory streaming. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(3):e1002925.
9. Pressnitzer D, Suied C, Shamma SA. Auditory scene analysis: the sweet music of ambiguity. Front Hum Neurosci. 2011;5:158.
10. Snyder JS, Alain C. Toward a neurophysiological theory of auditory stream segregation. Psychol Bull. 2007;133(5):780-99.
11. Bayat A, Farhadi M, Pourbakht A, Sadjedi H, Emamdjomeh H, Kamali M, et al. A comparison of auditory perception in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners: an auditory scene analysis study. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2013;15(11):e9477.
12. Rose MM, Moore BC. The relationship between stream segregation and frequency discrimination in normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. Hear Res. 2005;204(1-2):16-28.
13. Stach BA. Comprehensive dictionary of audiology illustrated. 2nd ed. Clifton Park, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning; 2003.
14. Rose MM, Moore BC. Perceptual grouping of tone sequences by normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997;102(3):1768-78.
15. Moore BC, Gockel HE. Properties of auditory stream formation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012;367(1591):919-31.
16. Bregman AS. Auditory scene analysis A2. In: Squire LR, editor. Encyclopedia of neuroscience. 1st ed. Oxford: Academic Press; 2009. p. 729-36.
17. Scholes C, Palmer AR, Sumner CJ. Stream segregation in the anesthetized auditory cortex. Hear Res. 2015;328:48-58.
18. Carlyon RP. How the brain separates sounds. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004;8(10):465-71.
19. Cusack R. The intraparietal sulcus and perceptual organization. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005;17(4):641-51.
20. Talavage TM, Sereno MI, Melcher JR, Ledden PJ, Rosen BR, Dale AM. Tonotopic organization in human auditory cortex revealed by progressions of frequency sensitivity. J Neurophysiol. 2004;91(3):1282-96.
21. Moore BC. Parallels between frequency selectivity measured psychophysically and in cochlear mechanics. Scand Audiol Suppl. 1986;25:139-52.
22. Beauvois MW, Meddis R. A computer model of auditory stream segregation. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1991;43(3):517-41.
Published
2016-09-19
How to Cite
1.
Moghadasi Boroujeni F, Rouzbahani M, Heidari F, Kamali M. Normative variation of auditory stream segregation in adults. Aud Vestib Res. 25(3):135-139.
Section
Research Article(s)