Research Article

Acceptable Noise Level in Children with Unilateral Cochlear Implant and Bimodal Hearing


Background and Aim: Difficulty in perception of speech in noise is one of the main complaints of hearing-impaired people. Due to profound hearing loss in cochlear implant (CI) users, they need higher signal-to-noise ratio for a better perception. Bimodal fitting is a preferred way for CI users because it prevents auditory nerve degeneration, is a complement of frequency range at the opposite ear, an is less invasive to provide binaural hearing. Acceptable noise level (ANL), as a reliable test to assess noise tolerance, has not yet been used in comparing children with bimodal hearing and CI. This study aimed to determine whether bimodal fitting can help CI children tolerate more noise.
Methods: This descriptive-analytical study was conducted on 13 children with unilateral CI and bimodal hearing. Audiometry test was performed at aided and non-aided conditions. Then, their noise tolerance was assessed by the Persian version of ANL test.
Results: Bimodal hearing resulted in statistically significant increase in ANL. The mean of ANL at unilateral CI and bimodal hearing conditions were 6.15±2.90 and 4.77±1.70, respectively.
Conclusion: Bimodal fitting lead to more noise tolerance in unilateral CI children due to the combination of binaural summation and binaural release from masking.

[1] Silman S, Gelfand SA, Silverman CA. Late‐onset auditory deprivation: effects of monaural versus binaural hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am. 1984;76(5):1357-62. [DOI:10.1121/1.391451]
[2] Choi SJ, Lee JB, Bahng J, Lee WK, Park CH, Kim H-J, et al. Effect of low frequency on speech performance with bimodal hearing in bilateral severe hearing loss. Laryngoscope. 2016;126(12):2817-22. [DOI:10.1002/lary.26014]
[3] Ching TYC, Massie R, van Wanrooy E, Rushbrooke E, Psarros C. Bimodal fitting or bilateral implantation? Cochlear Implants Int. 2009;10 Suppl 1:23-7. [DOI:10.1179/cim.2009.10.Supplement-1.23]
[4] Caldwell A, Nittrouer S. Speech perception in noise by children with cochlear implants. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013;56(1):13-30. [DOI:10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0338)]
[5] Fu Q-J, Nogaki G. Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: the role of spectral resolution and smearing. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2005;6(1):19-27. [DOI:10.1007/s10162-004-5024-3]
[6] Torkildsen JVK, Hitchins A, Myhrum M, Wie OB. Speech-in-Noise Perception in Children with Cochlear Implants, Hearing Aids, Developmental Language Disorder and Typical Development: The Effects of Linguistic and Cognitive Abilities. Front Psychol. 2019;10:2530. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02530]
[7] Fitzpatrick EM, Leblanc S. Exploring the factors influencing discontinued hearing aid use in patients with unilateral cochlear implants. Trends Amplif. 2010;14(4):199-210. [DOI:10.1177/1084713810396511]
[8] Nabelek AK, Tucker FM, Letowski TR. Toleration of background noises: relationship with patterns of hearing aid use by elderly persons. J Speech Hear Res. 1991;34(3):679-85.
[9] Nabelek AK. Acceptance of background noise may be key to successful fittings. The Hearing Journal. 2005;58(4):10-5. [DOI:10.1097/01.HJ.0000286602.38611.56]
[10] Nasiri E, Jalilvand H, Yazdani N, Akbarzade Baghban AR Acceptable Noise Level in Unilateral Ménière’s Disease. Aud Vestib Res. 2022. 31(1).11-6. [DOI:10.18502/avr.v31i1.8129]
[11] Aghsoleimani M, Jalilvand H, Mahdavi ME, Nazeri AR, Kamali M. The Acceptable Noise Level Benefit from Directionality for Listeners with Severe Hearing Loss. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;11(3):166-73. [DOI:10.21053/ceo.2017.01375]
[12] Ahmadi R, Jalilvand H, Mahdavi ME, Ahmadi F, Akbarzade Baghban AR. The Effects of Hearing Aid Digital Noise Reduction and Directionality on Acceptable Noise Level. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;11(4):267-74. [DOI:10.21053/ceo.2018.00052]
[13] Akaberi K, Jalilvand H, Mahdavi ME, Nazeri AR, Tabatabaee SM. Assessment of acceptable noise level in unilateral hearing aid users. Aud Vestib Res. 2020;29(1):48-53. [DOI:10.18502/avr.v29i1.2369]
[14] Plyler PN, Bahng J, von Hapsburg D. The acceptance of background noise in adult cochlear implant users. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51(2):502-15. [DOI:10.1044/1092-4388(2008/036)]
[15] Dillon H. Hearing Aids. 1st ed. Turramurra NSW Hodder Arnold; 2008. [DOI:10.1201/b15118-293]
[16] Nabelek AK, Freyaldenhoven MC, Tampas JW, Burchfiel SB, Muenchen RA. Acceptable noise level as a predictor of hearing aid use. J Am Acad Audiol. 2006;17(9):626-39. [DOI:10.3766/jaaa.17.9.2]
[17] Moore DR. Anatomy and physiology of binaural hearing. Audiology. 1991;30(3):125-34. [DOI:10.3109/00206099109072878]
[18] Dieudonné B, Francart T. Speech Understanding with Bimodal Stimulation Is Determined by Monaural Signal to Noise Ratios: No Binaural Cue Processing Involved. Ear Hear. 2020;41(5):1158-71. [DOI:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000834]
[19] Dimitrijevic A, Smith ML, Kadis DS, Moore DR. Neural indices of listening effort in noisy environments. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):11278. [DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-47643-1]
[20] Scherf FWAC, Arnold LP. Exploring the clinical approach to the bimodal fitting of hearing aids and cochlear implants: Results of an international survey. Acta Otolaryngol. 2014;134(11):1151-7. [DOI:10.3109/00016489.2014.914244]
IssueVol 31 No 4 (2022) QRcode
SectionResearch Article(s)
Acceptable noise level cochlear implant hearing aid bimodal hearing profound hearing loss binaural hearing

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Ashjaei S, Jalilvand H, Hadipour H, Sadeghi R. Acceptable Noise Level in Children with Unilateral Cochlear Implant and Bimodal Hearing. Aud Vestib Res. 2022;31(4):295-300.