Development of a Binaural Masking Level Differences Test Application Using Tonal and Speech Stimuli in Persian and Assessing Its Test-Retest Reliability in Normal-Hearing Young People
,
Abstract
Background and Aim: The masking level difference (MLD) test is a behavioral test that assesses binaural interactions and central auditory processing. This study aims to design a binaural MLD (BMLD) test application using tonal and Speech Stimuli in Persian.
Methods: In the first stage, the BMLD test application was designed in MATLAB software. Then, the spondaic words were recorded and added to the sound processing panel of the application. In the next stage, the MLD of tonal and speech stimuli was measured on 20 subjects aged 18–25 years. To examine the test-retest reliability of the application, all steps were repeated after one week.
Results: The MLD values for tonal and speech stimuli under the SoNo-SπNo condition were significantly different from those under the SoNo-SoNπ condition (p<0.05). These values for tonal and speech stimuli were 10.50 and 6.12 dB under the SoNo- SπNo condition, and 6.85 and 4.43 under the SoNo- SoNπ condition. There was no significant difference in the MLD values between males and females. The intraclass correlation coefficient value for different phase conditions was more than 0.8, indicating the high reliability of the BMLD test application for tonal and speech stimuli in Persian (p<0.05).
Conclusion: The designed BMLD test application using tonal and speech stimuli in Persian has similar results compared to the conventional methods of MLD test for other languages, therefore, this application can be used in audiology clinics in Iran to perform the MLD test.
[2] Adel Ghahraman M, Ashrafi M, Mohammadkhani G, Jalaie S. Effects of aging on spatial hearing. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020;32(4):733-9. [DOI:10.1007/s40520-019-01233-3]
[3] Ashrafi M, Maharati F, Jafarzadeh Bejestani S, Akbarzadeh Baghban A. Development and Psychometric Evaluation of Persian Dynamic Spatial Quick Speech-in-Noise Test in Adults with Normal Hearing. Aud Vestib Res. 2022;31(1):30-7. [DOI:10.18502/avr.v31i1.8132]
[4] Moore DR, Ferguson MA, Edmondson-Jones AM, Ratib S, Riley A. Nature of auditory processing disorder in children. Pediatrics. 2010;126(2):e382-90. [DOI:10.1542/peds.2009-2826]
[5] Lucker JR. History of auditory processing disorders in children. In: Geffner D, Ross-Swain D, editors. Auditory processing disorders: Assessment, management, and treatment. San Diego: Plural Publishing. 2007;5(2)33-41.
[6] Burnham MN. Normal Masking Level Difference Parameters for Use in the Clinical Evaluation of Auditory Processing Disorders. [MSc Dissertation]. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University; 2010.
[7] Goldstein DP, Stephens SD. Masking level difference: a measure of auditory processing capability. Audiology. 1975;14(4):354-67. [DOI:10.3109/00206097509071749]
[8] Olsen WO, Noffsinger D, Carhart R. Masking level differences encountered in clinical populations. Audiology. 1976;15(4):287-301. [DOI:10.3109/00206097609071789]
[9] Olsen WO, Noffsinger D. Masking level differences for cochlear and brain stem lesions. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1976;85(6 PT. 1):820-5. [DOI:10.1177/000348947608500611]
[10] de Carvalho NG, Ramos do Amaral MI, de Barros VZ, Dos Santos MFC. Masking Level Difference: Performance of School Children Aged 7-12 Years. J Audiol Otol. 2021;25(2):65-71. [DOI:10.7874/jao.2019.00521]
[11] Merchant GR, Dorey C, Porter HL, Buss E, Leibold LJ. Feasibility of remote assessment of the binaural intelligibility level difference in school-age children. JASA Express Lett. 2021;1(1):014405. [DOI:10.1121/10.0003323]
[12] Van Deun L, van Wieringen A, Van den Bogaert T, Scherf F, Offeciers FE, Van de Heyning PH, et al. Sound localization, sound lateralization, and binaural masking level differences in young children with normal hearing. Ear Hear. 2009;30(2):178-90. [DOI:10.1097/AUD.0b013e318194256b]
[13] Brown M, Musiek F. Pathways: The fundamentals of masking level differences for assessing auditory function. The Hearing Journal. 2013;66(1): 16-7. [DOI:10.1097/01.HJ.0000425772.41884.1d]
[14] Findlay RC, Schuchman GI. Masking level difference for speech: Effects of ear dominance and age. Audiology. 1976;15(3):232-41. [DOI:10.3109/00206097609071781]
[15] Licklider JCR. The influence of interaural phase relations upon the masking of speech by white noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1948;20(2):150-9. [DOI:10.1121/1.1906358]
[16] Hirsh IJ. Binaural summation and interaural inhibition as a function of the level of masking noise. Am J Psychol. 1948;61(2):205-13. [DOI:10.2307/1416966]
[17] Grose JH, Poth EA, Peters RW. Masking level differences for tones and speech in elderly listeners with relatively normal audiograms. J Speech Hear Res. 1994;37(2):422-8. [DOI:10.1044/jshr.3702.422]
[18] Johansson MSK, Arlinger SD. Binaural masking level difference for speech signals in noise. Int J Audiol. 2002;41(5):279-84. [DOI:10.3109/14992020209077187]
[19] Yost WA. Fundamental of hearing: An introduction. 5th ed. San Diego, CA: Elsevier; 2007.8
[20] Mendes SD, Branco-Barreiro FC, Frota S. Masking level difference: reference values in adults. Audiol Commun Res. 2017;22:e1746. [DOI:10.1590/2317-6431-2016-1746]
[21] Wilson RH, Moncrieff DW, Townsend EA, Pillion AL. Development of a 500-Hz masking-level difference protocol for clinic use. J Am Acad Audiol. 2003;14(1):1-8. [DOI:10.3766/jaaa.14.1.2]
[22] Wilson RH,, Hopkins JL, Mance CM, Novak RE. Detection and recognition masking-level differences for the individual CID W-1 spondaic words. J Speech Hear Res. 1982;25(2):235-42. [DOI:10.1044/jshr.2502.235]
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 31 No 4 (2022) | |
| Section | Research Article(s) | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/avr.v31i4.10736 | |
| Keywords | ||
| Release from masking masking binaural hearing software | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
