Research Article

Auditory Spatial Training-Induced Changes in the Release of Informational Masking in Older Adults


Background and Aim: Generally, in noisy environments more informational masking occurs. Older adults benefit less than younger adults from spatial hearing and they have more problems of understanding speech in the presence of distracting speeches. This study was conducted to examine the effect of auditory spatial training on informational masking release in the elderly.
Methods: Thirty-two 60-75-year-olds with normal hearing, who complain about difficulty in speech perception in noise, participated in control and intervention groups (16 people in each group). The intervention included fifteen sessions of auditory spatial training. The informational masking measurement test scores were compared before the intervention, one session after the intervention, and one month after between the two groups.
Results: There was a significant improvement in informational masking measurement scores in the intervention group compared to the control (p<0.02). The results showed no significant differences between the informational masking measurement scores before and after the intervention in the control group (p>0.05) and a significant difference in most signal to noise ratio i.e. 0, -5 and -10, in the intervention group (p≤0.006). No significant difference was found between the results of the two assessments one session and one month after the intervention in any of the positions (p>0.05), which suggests that both groups’ scores remained highly stable one month after the intervention
Conclusion: This study introduced a spatial training program to improve speech perception in noise in normal-hearing elderly listeners. It was recommended that this kind of training be included in geriatric population auditory rehabilitation programs.

[1] Goossens T, Vercammen C, Wouters J, van Wieringen A. Masked speech perception across the adult lifespan: Impact of age and hearing impairment. Hear Res. 2017;344:109-24. [DOI:10.1016/j.heares.2016.11.004]
[2] Strouse A, Ashmead DH, Ohde RN, Grantham DW. Temporal processing in the aging auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998;104(4):2385-99. [DOI:10.1121/1.423748]
[3] Dai B, McQueen JM, Hagoort P, Kösem A. Pure linguistic interference during comprehension of competing speech signals. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017;141(3):EL249. [DOI:10.1121/1.4977590]
[4] Newman RS, Morini G, Ahsan F, Kidd Jr G. Linguisticallybased informational masking in preschool children. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015;138(1):EL93-8. [DOI:10.1121/1.4921677]
[5] Wightman FL, Kistler DJ, O’Bryan A. Individual differences and age effects in a dichotic informational masking paradigm. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010;128(1):270-9. [DOI:10.1121/1.3436536]
[6] Durlach NI, Mason CR, Kidd Jr. G, Arbogast TL, Colburn HS, Shinn-Cunningham BG. Note on informational masking (L). J Acoust Soc Am. 2003;113(6):2984-7. [DOI:10.1121/1.1570435]
[7] Rajan R, Cainer KE. Ageing without hearing loss or cognitive impairment causes a decrease in speech intelligibility only in informational maskers. Neuroscience. 2008;154(2):784-95. [DOI:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.03.067]
[8] Lu Z, Daneman M, Schneider BA. Does increasing the intelligibility of a competing sound source interfere more with speech comprehension in older adults than it does in younger adults? Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016;78(8):2655-77. [DOI:10.3758/s13414-016-1193-5]
[9] Micheyl C, Arthaud P, Reinhart C, Collet L. Informational masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Acta Otolaryngol. 2000;120(2):242-6. [DOI:10.1080/000164800750001017]
[10] Alexander JM, Lutfi RA. Informational masking in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners: sensation level and decision weights. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004;116(4 Pt 1):2234-47. [DOI:10.1121/1.1784437]
[11] Glyde H, Buchholz J, Dillon H, Best V, Hickson L, Cameron S. The effect of better-ear glimpsing on spatial release from masking. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013;134(4):2937-45. [DOI:10.1121/1.4817930]
[12] Yost WA. Spatial release from masking based on binaural processing for up to six maskers. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017;141(3):2093. [DOI:10.1121/1.4978614]
[13] Lin G, Carlile S. Costs of switching auditory spatial attention in following conversational turn-taking. Front Neurosci. 2015;9:124. [DOI:10.3389/fnins.2015.00124]
[14] Brungart DS, Simpson BD. The effects of spatial separation in distance on the informational and energetic masking of a nearby speech signal. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002;112(2):664-76. [DOI:10.1121/1.1490592]
[15] Glyde H, Hickson L, Cameron S, Dillon H. Problems hearing in noise in older adults: a review of spatial processing disorder. Trends Amplif. 2011;15(3):116-26. [DOI:10.1177/1084713811424885]
[16] Ahveninen J, Kopčo N, Jääskeläinen IP. Psychophysics and neuronal bases of sound localization in humans. Hear Res. 2014;307:86-97. [DOI:10.1016/j.heares.2013.07.008]
[17] Dubno JR, Ahlstrom JB, Horwitz AR. Binaural advantage for younger and older adults with normal hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51(2):539-56. [DOI:10.1044/1092-4388(2008/039)]
[18] Glyde H, Buchholz JM, Dillon H, Cameron S, Hickson L. The importance of interaural time differences and level differences in spatial release from masking. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013;134(2):EL147-52. [DOI:10.1121/1.4812441]
[19] Helfer KS, Merchant GR, Freyman RL. Aging and the effect of target-masker alignment. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016;140(5):3844-53. [DOI:10.1121/1.4967297]
[20] Shinn-Cunningham B. Models of plasticity in spatial auditory processing. Audiol Neurootol. 2001;6(4):187-91. [DOI:10.1159/000046830]
[21] Sweetow RW, Sabes JH. The need for and development of an adaptive Listening and Communication Enhancement (LACE) Program. J Am Acad Audiol. 2006;17(8):538-58. [DOI:10.3766/jaaa.17.8.2]
[22] Anderson S, Kraus N. Auditory Training: Evidence for Neural Plasticity in Older Adults. Perspect Hear Hear Disord Res Res Diagn. 2013;17:37-57. [DOI:10.1044/hhd17.1.37]
[23] Swaminathan J, Mason CR, Streeter TM, Best V, Kidd Jr G, Patel AD. Musical training, individual differences and the cocktail party problem. Sci Rep. 2015;5:11628. [DOI:10.1038/srep11628]
[24] Ansari NN, Naghdi S, Hasson S, Valizadeh L, Jalaie S. Validation of a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) for the Persian population: a pilot study. Appl Neuropsychol. 2010;17(3):190-5. [DOI:10.1080/09084282.2010.499773]
[25] Amiri M, Jarollahi F, Jalaie S, Sameni SJ. A New Speechin-Noise Test for Measuring Informational Masking in Speech Perception Among Elderly Listeners. Cureus. 2020;12(3):e7356. [DOI:10.7759/cureus.7356]
[26] Shayanmehr S, Tahaei AA, Fatahi J, Jalaie S, Modarresi Y. Development, validity and reliability of Persian quick speech in noise test with steady noise. Aud Vestib Res. 2015;24(4):234-44.
[27] Moossavi A, Javanbakht M, Arbab Sarjoo H, Bakhshi E, Mahmoodi Bakhtiari B, Lotf Y. Developmentand Psychometric Evaluation of Persian version of the Quick Speech in Noise Test in Persian Speaking 18-25 Years Old Normal Adults. JRSR. 2016;3(3):51-6. [DOI:10.30476/JRSR.2016.41099]
[28] Cameron S, Glyde H, Dillon H. Efficacy of the LiSN & Learn auditory training software: randomized blinded controlled study. Audiol Res. 2012;2(1):e15. [DOI:10.4081/audiores.2012.e15]
[29] Glyde H, Cameron S, Dillon H, Hickson L. Remediation of spatial processing deficits in hearing-impaired children and adults. J Am Acad Audiol. 2014;25(6):549-61. [DOI:10.3766/jaaa.25.6.5]
[30] Tyler RS, Witt SA, Dunn CC, Wang W. Initial development of a spatially separated speech-in-noise and localization training program. J Am Acad Audiol. 2010;21(6):390-403. [DOI:10.3766/jaaa.21.6.4]
[31] Humes LE, Kinney DL, Brown SE, Kiener AL, Quigley TM. The effects of dosage and duration of auditory training for older adults with hearing impairment. J Acoust Soc Am. 2014;136(3):EL224. [DOI:10.1121/1.4890663]
[32] Lotfi Y, Samadi-Qaleh-Juqy Z, Moosavi A, Sadjedi H, Bakhshi E. The Effects of Spatial Auditory Training on Speech Perception in Noise in the Elderly. Crescent J Med Biol Sci. 2020;7(1):40-6.
[33] Delphi M, Lotfi Y, Moossavi A, Bakhshi E, Banimostafa M. Envelope-based inter-aural time difference localization training to improve speech-in-noise perception in the elderly. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2017;31:36. [DOI:10.14196/mjiri.31.36]
[34] Ashrafi M, Adel Ghahraman M, Mohammadkhani G, Jalaie S, Sadjedi H. The Effects of Dynamic Spatial Hearing Rehabilitation Combined With Transcranial Electrical Stimulation on Speech Perception in Noise in Elderly Men: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Crescent J Med Biol Sci. 2021;8(4):283-95.
[35] Chermak GD, Musiek FE, Craig CH. Central Auditory Processing Disorders: New Perspectives. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group; 1997.
[36] Delphi M, Lotfi MY, Moossavi A, Bakhshi E, Banimostafa M. Reliability of Interaural Time Difference-Based Localization Training in Elderly Individuals with Speech-in-Noise Perception Disorder. Iran J Med Sci. 2017;42(5):437-42.
IssueVol 31 No 4 (2022) QRcode
SectionResearch Article(s)
Informational masking energetic masking elderly speech perception in noise

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Amiri M, Jarollahi F, Jalaie S, Sameni SJ. Auditory Spatial Training-Induced Changes in the Release of Informational Masking in Older Adults. Aud Vestib Res. 2022;31(4):301-310.