Construction and Standardization of the Syrian Version of the Word Recognition Test for Children with Hearing Impairment
Background and Aim: This study aimed to construct and validate the test material of speech recognition test for children. Such a material helps in conducting the speech tests for native Arab children with Syrian accent. This work is a part of a complete project on preparing and validating the necessary materials for speech and central auditory processing tests for the Arabic Syrian community.
Methods: In this cross-sectional comparative study, two sets of phonetically balanced monosyllabic word lists were constructed. The two selected 25-monosyllabic word lists were presented to 50 normal hearing participants with the age range of 5 to 10 years. Tests of validity and reliability were conducted to assure the suitability of this material for the word recognition test. The test was repeated for the same children after three weeks.
Results: The two word lists have shown high face and content validity, Cronbach`s alpha coefficient was 0.79, 0.85 for the two lists respectively. Factor validity has shown that the test materials are one-dimensional, the first factor achieved 57.25 and 53.13 of the variance. Test-retest reliability (p<0.001) and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients reliability (p<0.001) were also significant.
Conclusion: The data analysis shows that the Syrian version of the word recognition test has high degree of validity and reliability. Therefore, developing the Syrian version of the scale has good psychometric properties, which makes it appropriate for the local use.
 Eilers RE, Wilson WR, Moore JM. Developmental changes in speech discrimination in infants. J Speech Hear Res. 1977;20(4):766-80. [DOI:10.1044/jshr.2004.766]
 ASHA. Hearing Screening and Testing. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. ASHA; [cited 2020 Oct 22]. Available from: https://www.asha.org/public/hearing/hearing-testing/
 Jones IH, Knudsen VO. LXXXI. Facts of Audition. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1925;34(4):1013-27. [DOI:10.1177/000348942503400401]
 Fee J. Speech Discrimination. B U L Rev. 2005;85:1103.
 Boothroyd A. Statistical theory of the speech discrimination score. J Acoust Soc Am. 1968;43(2):362-7. [DOI:10.1121/1.1910787]
 CDC. Types of Hearing Loss. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2020 [cited 2021 Apr 2]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/hearingloss/types.html
 Guidelines for determining threshold level for speech. ASHA. 1988;30(3):85-9.
 World Health Organization. Addressing the rising prevalence of hearing loss. World Health Organization; 2018. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/260336.Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
 Schmucker C, Kapp P, Motschall E, Loehler J, Meerpohl JJ. Prevalence of hearing loss and use of hearing aids among children and adolescents in Germany: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1277. [DOI:10.1186/s12889-019-7602-7]
 Bess FH, Dodd-Murphy J, Parker RA. Children with minimal sensorineural hearing loss: prevalence, educational performance, and functional status. Ear Hear. 1998;19(5):339-54. [DOI:10.1097/00003446-199810000-00001]
 CDC. Data and Statistics About Hearing Loss in Children. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 23]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/hearingloss/data.html
 Storkel HL, Morrisette ML. The Lexicon and Phonology: Interactions in Language Acquisition. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2002;33(1):24-37. [DOI:10.1044/0161-1461(2002/003)]
 Roup CM, Wiley TL, Safady SH, Stoppenbach DT. Tympanometric Screening Norms for Adults. Am J Audiol. 1998;7(2):55-60. [DOI:10.1044/1059-0889(1998/014)]
 Frank T, Durrant JD, Lovrinic JM. Maximum Permissible Ambient Noise Levels for Audiometric Test Rooms. Am J Audiol. 1993;2(1):33-7. [DOI:10.1044/1059-0889.0201.33]
 ANSI. ANSI S3.6-2004 Specification for Audiometers. New York: American National Standard Institute; 2004.
 Ostergard CA. Factors Influencing the Validity and Reliability of Speech Audiometry. Semin Hear. 1983;4(3):221-39. [DOI:10.1055/s-0028-1091427]
 Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol. 1975;28(4):563-75. [DOI:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x]
 Yusoff MSB. ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Education in Medicine Journal. 2019;11(2):49-54. [DOI:10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.6]
 Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297-334. [DOI:10.1007/BF02310555]
 Watkins MW. Exploratory Factor Analysis: A Guide to Best Practice. J Black Psychol. 2018;44(3):219-46. [DOI:10.1177/0095798418771807]
 Crocker L, Algina J. Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. 1st ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1986.
 Hill BD. The sequential Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin procedure as an alternative for determining the number of factors in common-factor analysis: A Monte Carlo simulation. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Oklahoma State University; 2011.
 Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155-63. [DOI:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012]
 Pampel F. Toward Evidence-Based Practice in the Speech Audiometric Assessment of Linguistic Minorities. [BA Thesis]. Swarthmore College, PA; 2009.
 Ashoor AA, Prochazka Jr T. Saudi Arabic speech audiometry for children. Br J Audiol. 1985;19(3):229-38. [DOI:10.3109/03005368509078977]
 Mahdavi ME, Rabiei A. Psychometric function characteristics of Persian consonant vowel-consonant words. Aud Vestib Res. 2021;30(1):50-5. [DOI:10.18502/avr.v30i1.5311]
 Hirsh IJ, Davis H, Silverman SR, Reynolds EG, Eldert E, Benson RW. Development of materials for speech audiometry. J Speech Hear Disord. 1952;17(3):321-37. [DOI:10.1044/jshd.1703.321]
 McBride GB, Ellis JC. Confidence of compliance: A Bayesian approach for percentile standards. Water Res. 2001;35(5):1117-24. [DOI:10.1016/s0043-1354(00)00536-4]
 Domino G, Domino ML. Psychological Testing: An Introduction. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006.
|Issue||Vol 31 No 4 (2022)|
|Speech discrimination test monosyllabic arabic syrian accent|
|Rights and permissions|
|This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|