Development and determination of the validity of Persian version of monaural selective auditory attention test in learning disabled children
AbstractBackground and Aim: Given the prevalence of selective auditory attention deficit in children with learning disability (LD) and the need for standardization of screening tests and diagnosis of this deficit in our country, the aim of this study was development and determination of the validity of monaural selective auditory attention test "mSAAT" in Persian.Methods: This study was a test development based on cross sectional method that was performed in two steps, development and validation of the test and then the initial study. A four minute story and two lists of 25 mono-syllabic words from Persian word intelligibility by picture identification test was recorded by a male speaker. To maximize difficulty a 0 dB signal to noise ratio was used. After validity evaluation, 27 normal and 7 LD children aged 8 to 9 years were tested in both competitive and non-competitive manner.Results: Persian version of mSAAT had content-validity ratio of 0.91, 0.94, 1.00 for the first and second list and competing story respectively, and content-validity index of 0.88 was calculated for the whole test. Face validity was 4.16 and also significant difference was observed between test scores of the two groups of normal subjects and subjects with LD (p<0.001) that approved acceptable discriminant validity.Conclusion: Based on the obtained result, the Persian version of mSAAT appeared to have the potential as a valid measure of selective auditory attention skill and seems that it’s the same as the original test.
2. Talebi H, Tahayi SA, Akbari M, Kamali M. The comparison of auditory selective attention and auditory divided attention between patients with cerebrovascular accident and normal cases. Journal of Rehabilitation. 2007;8(1):17-24.
3. Cacace AT, McFarland DJ. Central auditory processing disorder in school-aged children: a critical review. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998;41(2):355-73.
4. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Learning disabilities: issues on definition [Relevant Paper]. 1991. Available from www.asha.org/policy.
5. Chermak GD, Vonhof MR, Bendel RB. Word identification performance in the presence of competing speech and noise in learning disabled adults. Ear Hear. 1989;10(2):90-3.
6. Katz J, Wilde L. Central auditory processing evaluation: a test battery approach. In: Katz J, editor. Handbook of clinical audiology. 7th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2015. p. 545-57.
7. Cherry R. The selective auditory attention test (SAAT): a screening test for central auditory processing disorders in children. In: Bess FH, Hall JW, editors. Screening children for auditory function. Bill Wilkerson Center Press; 1992. p. 361-71.
8. Cherry R, Rubinstein A. Comparing monotic and diotic selective auditory attention abilities in children. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2006;37(2):137-42.
9. Chermak GD, Montgomery MJ. Form equivalence of the Selective Auditory Attention Test administered to 6-year-old children. J Speech Hear Res. 1992;35(3):661-5.
10. Adel Ghahraman M, Modaresi Y, Sedaei M, Babaei G. Development, standardization and evaluation of a close-set speech recognition test for Persian speaking children of 4 to 6 years old. Audiol. 2000;8(1-2):14-9. Persian.
11. Friberg JC, McNamara TL. Evaluating the reliability and validity of (central) auditory processing tests: a preliminary investigation. J Educ Audiol. 2010;16:4-17.
12. Iliadou V, Bamiou D, Kaprinis S, Kandylis D, Kaprinis D. Auditory Processing Disorders in children suspected of Learning Disabilities—A need for screening? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;73(7):1029-34.