Perceived social support in mothers of typically developing children and mothers of children with hearing sensory impairment

  • Ghorban Hemati Alamdarloo Department of Special Education, School of Education and Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
  • Aghdas Rangani Department of Special Education, School of Education and Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
  • Sedighe Rostami Department of Special Education, School of Education and Psychology, University of Allameh Tabatabaie, Tehran, Iran
  • Monire Morovat Department of Special Education, School of Education and Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
Keywords: Perceived social support; mothers; children; hearing impairment; visual impairment

Abstract

Background and Aim: Children with sensory impairments can bring stress to their parents. The purpose of this study was to compare perceived social support in mothers of children with hearing impairment, visual impairment, and typically developing children in Shiraz City, Iran.Methods: The study sample consisted of 139 mothers of normal children and children with sensory impairment (50 mothers of children with hearing impairment, 39 mothers of children with visual impairment, and 50 mothers of typically developing children). The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support was used to measure perceived social support. One-way ANOVA and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) were respectively used for analyzing the total score of perceived social support and the scores of its subscales.Results: The results showed that there was a significant difference between perceived social support and its subscales among mothers of children with hearing impairment, mothers of chi­ldren with visual impairment and mothers of typically developing children. So, perceived social support and its subscales in mothers of children with hearing impairment and mothers of children with visual impairment are significantly lower than mothers of typically developing children (p < 0.01). It should be noted that there was no significant difference in perceived social support between mothers of children with hearing impairment and mothers of children with visual impairment.Conclusion: The provision of counseling services and the implementation of appropriate interventions for mothers of children with hearing impairment and mothers of children with visual impairment is necessary.

References

1. Schieve LA, Blumberg SJ, Rice C, Visser SN, Boyle C. The relationship between autism and parenting stress. Pediatrics. 2007;119(Suppl. 1):S114-21. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-2089Q
2. Woolfson L. Family well-being and disabled children: a psychosocial model of disability-related child behaviour problems. Br J Health Psychol. 2004;9(Pt 1):1-13. doi: 10.1348/135910704322778687
3. Meadan H, Halle JW, Ebata AT. Families with children who have autism spectrum disorders: stress and support. Except Child. 2010;77(1):7-36. doi: 10.1177/001440291007700101
4. Koydemir S, Tosun Ü. Impact of autistic children on the lives of mothers. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2009;1(1):2534-40. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.447
5. Chandorkar H, Chakraborty PK. Psychological mor¬bidity of parents of mentally retarded children. Indian J Psychiatry. 2000;42(3):271-4.
6. Gupta A, Singhal N. Positive perceptions in parents of children with disabilities. Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal. 2004;15(1):22-35.
7. Remine MD, Brown PM. Comparison of the prevalence of mental health problems in deaf and hearing children and adolescents in Australia. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2010;44(4):351-7. doi: 10.3109/00048670903489866
8. Haber MG, Toro PA. Homelessness among families, children, and adolescents: an ecological-developmental perspective. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2004;7(3):123-64. doi: 10.1023/B:CCFP.0000045124.09503.f1
9. Gülaçtı F. The effect of perceived social support on subjective well-being. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2010;2(2):3844-9. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.602
10. Taylor SE, Sherman DK, Kim HS, Jarcho J, Takagi K, Dunagan MS. Culture and social support: who seeks it and why? J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004;87(3):354-62. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.354
11. Langeland E, Wahl AK. The impact of social support on mental health service users' sense of coherence: a longitudinal panel survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46(6):830-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.12.017
12. World Health Organization. Promoting mental health: concepts, emerging evidence, practice: summary report/a report from the World Health Organization, Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse in collaboration with the Victorian Health Promotion Foundation and the University of Melbourne. http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42940 Accessed on 2004.
13. Felton BJ. Coping and social support in older people’s experiences of chronic illness. In: Stephens MAP, Crowther JH, Hofoll SE, Tennenbaum DL, editors. Stress and coping in later-life families. New York: Hemisphere; 1990. pp. 153-71.
14. Stensletten K, Bruvik F, Espehaug B, Drageset J. Burden of care, social support, and sense of coherence in elderly caregivers living with individuals with symptoms of dementia. Dementia (London). 2016;15(6):1422-35.. doi: 10.1177/1471301214563319
15. Cockerham WC. Medical sociology. 1st edition. NewYork: Taylor & Francis; 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315618692
16. Strazdins L, Broom DH. The mental health costs and benefits of giving social support. Int J Stress Manag. 2007;14(4):370-85. doi: 10.1037/1072-5245.14.4.370
17. Karademas EC. Self-efficacy, social support and well-being: The mediating role of optimism. J Individ Differ. 2006;40(6):1281-90. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.10.019
18. Dehle C, Landers JE. You can't always get what you want, but can you get what you need? personality traits and social support in marriage. Journal of social and clinical Psychology. 2005;24(7):1051-76. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2005.24.7.1051
19. Brouwers A, Evers W, Tomic W. Self‐efficacy in eliciting social support and burnout among secondary‐school teachers. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2001;31(7):1474-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb02683.x
20. Chu RJ. How family support and Internet self-efficacy influence the effects of e-learning among higher aged adults Analyses of gender and age differences. Comput Educ. 2010;55(1):255-64. doi; 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.01.011
21. Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, Farley GK. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Pers Assess. 1988;52(1):30-41. doi; 10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2
22. Bruwer B, Emsley R, Kidd M, Lochner C, Seedat S. Psychometric properties of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support in youth. Compr Psychiatry. 2008;49(2):195-201. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2007.09.002
23. Correa VI, Bonilla ZE, Reyes-MacPherson ME. Support networks of single puerto rican mothers of children with disabilities. J Child Fam Stud. 2011;20(1):66-77. doi: 10.1007/s10826-010-9378-3
24. Quittner AL, Glueckauf RL, Jackson DN. Chronic parenting stress: Moderating versus mediating effects of social support. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1990;59(6):1266-78. doi; 10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1266
25. Quittner AL, Barker DH, Cruz I, Snell C, Grimley ME, Botteri M. Parenting stress among parents of deaf and hearing children: associations with language delays and behavior problems. Parent Sci Pract. 2010;10(2):136-55. doi: 10.1080/15295190903212851
26. Bromley J, Hare DJ, Davison K, Emerson E. Mothers supporting children with autistic spectrum disorders: Social support, mental health status and satisfaction with services. Autism. 2004;8(4):409-23. doi; 10.1177/1362361304047224
Published
2019-06-18
How to Cite
1.
Hemati Alamdarloo G, Rangani A, Rostami S, Morovat M. Perceived social support in mothers of typically developing children and mothers of children with hearing sensory impairment. Aud Vestib Res. 28(3):198-203.
Section
Research Article(s)