Comparing the quick speech-in-noise test results in migraineurs without aura and normal subjects

  • Sabihe Amini Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Fahimeh Hajiabolhassan Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Jamileh Fatahi Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Shohreh Jalaie Biostatistics, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Mohammad Hosein Nilforoush Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Keywords: Migraine without aura; speech perception in noise; quick speech in noise test; central auditory processing

Abstract

Background and Aim: Migraine is a relatively common neurovascular disease. Audiology studies have shown some ways of influencing migraine by the auditory pathways from cochlea to the auditory cortex. Considering that one of the most important functions of the central auditory system is speech perception in challenging conditions, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability to understand speech in noise in migraineurs without aura, and compare it with normal subjects.Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 30 migraineurs without aura aged 17 to 41 years (mean=31.9, SD=6.89) and 30 normal individuals who were matched for age and sex with the migraine group were evaluated by quick speech-in-noise test (Q-SIN). The correlation between duration of the disease and the frequency of attacks per month and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) loss, as well as the role of headache severity on the scores were assessed.Results: In Q-SIN test, the mean SNR loss in migraineurs without aura was greater than that in controls (p<0.05). But this ability did not differ between males and females (p>0.05). There was no correlation between the duration of migraine, frequency of attacks per month and the severity of headache with SNR loss (p>0.05).Conclusion: Migraineurs without aura sometimes have difficulties in speech perception in noise which is not affected by duration of disease, its frequency and the severity of the attacks.

References

1. Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Celentano DD, Reed ML. Prevalence of migraine headache in the United States. Relation to age, income, race, and other sociodemographic factors. JAMA. 1992;267(1):64-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.1992.03480010072027
2. Wolff HG. Headache: and other head pain. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1963.
3. Nagata E, Shibata M, Hamada J, Shimizu T, Katoh Y, Gotoh K, et al. Plasma 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) in migraine during an attack-free period. Headache. 2006;46(4):592-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00408.x
4. Sharifian Alborzi M, Zarrinkoob H, Dibajnia P, Tabatabaee SM. [Physiological and electrophysiological hearing tests in migrainers]. Advances in Cognitive Science. 2013;15(1):59-66. Persian.
5. Hamed SA, Youssef AH, Elattar AM. Assessment of cochlear and auditory pathways in patients with migraine. Am J Otolaryngol. 2012;33(4):385-94. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2011.10.008
6. Gopal KV, Allport JM, Baldridge MR. Auditory behavioral and evoked potential measures in migraineurs during attack-free period. Audiological Medicine. 2007;5(3):160-8. doi: 10.1080/16513860701633466
7. Morlet D, Demarquay G, Brudon F, Fischer C, Caclin A. Attention orienting dysfunction with preserved automatic auditory change detection in migraine. Clin Neurophysiol. 2014;125(3):500-11. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.05.032
8. Taylor B. Speech-in-noise tests: How and why to include them in your basic test battery. Hear J. 2003;56(1):40,42-6. doi: 10.1097/01.HJ.0000293000.76300.ff
9. Killion MC, Niquette PA, Gudmundsen GI, Revit LJ, Banerjee S. Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004;116(4 Pt 1):2395-405.
10. Olesen J, Friberg L, Olsen TS, Andersen AR, Lassen NA, Hansen PE, et al. Ischaemia-induced (symptomatic) migraine attacks may be more frequent than migraine-induced ischaemic insults. Brain. 1993;116 (Pt 1):187-202. doi: 10.1093/brain/116.1.187
11. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia. 2013;33(9):629-808. doi: 10.1177/0333102413485658
12. Agessi LM, Villa TR, Dias KZ, Carvalho Dde S, Pereira LD. Central auditory processing and migraine: a controlled study. J Headache Pain. 2014;15:72. doi: 10.1186/1129-2377-15-72
13. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971;9(1):97-113.
14. Shayanmehr S, Tahaei AA, Fatahi J, Jalaie S, Modarresi Y. Development, validity and reliability of Persian quick speech in noise test with steady noise. Aud Vest Res. 2015;24(4):234-44.
15. Hanilou J, Fatahi J, Tahaei AA, Jalaie S. List equivalency of the Persian quick speech in noise test on hearing impaired subjects. Aud Vest Res. 2016;25(1):7-13.
16. Musiek FE, Weihing JA, Oxholm VB. Anatomy and physiology of the central auditory nervous system: a clinical perspective. In: Roeser RJ, Valente M, Hosford-Dunn H, editors. Audiology diagnosis. 2nd ed. New York: Thieme; 2007. p. 37-64.
17. de Boer J, Thornton AR, Krumbholz K. What is the role of the medial olivocochlear system in speech-in-noise processing? J Neurophysiol. 2012;107(5):1301-12. doi: 10.1152/jn.00222.2011
18. Lorenzi C, Gilbert G, Carn H, Garnier S, Moore BC. Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(49):18866-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0607364103
19. Tajik S, Adel Ghahraman M, Tahaie AA, Hajiabolhassan F, Jalilvand Karimi L, Jalaie S. Deficit of auditory temporal processing in children with dyslexia-dysgraphia. Aud Vest Res. 2017;21(4):76-83.
20. Wong PC, Jin JX, Gunasekera GM, Abel R, Lee ER, Dhar S. Aging and cortical mechanisms of speech perception in noise. Neuropsychologia. 2009;47(3):693-703. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.11.032
21. Papesh MA, Hurley LM. Modulation of auditory brainstem responses by serotonin and specific serotonin receptors. Hear Res. 2016;332:121-36. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.11.014
22. Noseda R, Burstein R. Migraine pathophysiology: anatomy of the trigeminovascular pathway and associated neurological symptoms, CSD, sensitization and modulation of pain. Pain. 2013;154: Suppl 1. S44-53. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.07.021
23. Joffily L, de Melo Tavares de Lima MA, Vincent MB, Frota SM. Assessment of otoacoustic emission suppression in women with migraine and phonophobia. Neurol Sci. 2016;37(5):703-9. doi: 10.1007/s10072-016-2565-2
24. Ciriaco A, Russo A, Monzani D, Genovese E, Benincasa P, Caffo E, et al. A preliminary study on the relationship between central auditory processing and childhood primary headaches in the intercritical phase. J Headache Pain. 2013;14:69. doi: 10.1186/1129-2377-14-69
25. Gheissi E, Fatahi J, Farahani S, Jalaie S, Tahaei AA. Test-retest reliability and list equivalency of Persian quick speech in noise test in Azeri-Persian bilinguals. Aud Vest Res. 2017;26(3):157-62.
26. Boćkowski L, Sobaniec W, Sołowiej E, Smigielska-Kuzia J. [Auditory cognitive event-related potentials in migraine with and without aura in children and adolescents]. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2004;38(1):9-14. Polish.
Published
2018-09-18
How to Cite
1.
Amini S, Hajiabolhassan F, Fatahi J, Jalaie S, Nilforoush MH. Comparing the quick speech-in-noise test results in migraineurs without aura and normal subjects. Aud Vestib Res. 27(4):215-22.
Section
Research Article(s)