Effects of short-term caffeine consumption on speech and sound reception in individuals with normal hearing
AbstractBackground and Aim: Caffeine consumes targeted attention to the signal, which is expected to lead to increased noise tolerance and ultimately improved speech perception. In the current study, the effect of short-term caffeine consumption on speech and noise simultaneous reception function was evaluated using acceptable noise level (ANL) test.Methods: In this interventional double-blind study, 90 cases (45 male, 45 female) aged 18−34 years were randomly assigned into three groups: the test groups, 3 and 5 mg/kg caffeine, and the control group, just placebo. The ANL test was recorded before and one hour after intervention. The results were compared before and after taking caffeine in three groups.Results: The statistical analysis revealed that there was significant difference in ANL result in dose 3 mg/kg caffeine before and one hour after intervention (p=0.043) and there was a significant difference in ANL result in dose 5 mg/kg caffeine before and one hour after intervention (p=0.001). Also, there was a significant difference in ANL before and one hour after taking caffeine between the group receiving 3 mg/kg dose of caffeine and the 5 mg/kg dose of caffeine (p=0.015).Conclusion: According to the findings of the study, after an hour of caffeine consumption, the ANL decreases. In other words, the individuals tolerate higher levels of speech noise. This is also dependent on the dose of caffeine.
2. Benowitz NL. Clinical pharmacology of caffeine. Annu Rev Med. 1990;41:277-88. doi: 10.1146/annurev.me.41.020190.001425
3. Nehlig A, Daval JL, Debry G. Caffeine and the central nervous system: mechanisms of action, biochemical, metabolic and psychostimulant effects. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1992;17(2):139-70. doi: 10.1016/0165-0173(92)90012-B
4. Ruxton CHS. The impact of caffeine on mood, cognitive function, performance and hydration: a review of benefits and risks. Nutr Bull. 2008;33(1):15-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-3010.2007.00665.x
5. Heatherley SV, Hancock KM, Rogers PJ. Psychostimulant and other effects of caffeine in 9- to 11-year-old children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006;47(2):135-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01457.x
6. Liu K, Liang X, Kuang W. Tea consumption maybe an effective active treatment for adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Med Hypotheses. 2011;76(4):461-3. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2010.08.049
7. Lara DR. Caffeine, mental health, and psychiatric disorders. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;20 Suppl 1:S239-48. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2010-1378
8. Ribeiro JA1, Sebastião AM. Caffeine and adenosine. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;20 Suppl 1:S3-15. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2010-1379
9. Snel J, Lorist MM. Effects of caffeine on sleep and cognition. In: Van Dongen HPA, Kerkhof GA, editors. Human sleep and cognition, Part II: clinical and applied research. 1st ed. New York: Elsevier; 2011. p. 105-18.
10. Angelucci ME, Vital MA, Cesário C, Zadusky CR, Rosalen PL, Da Cunha C. The effect of caffeine in animal models of learning and memory. Eur J Pharmacol. 1999;373(2-3):135-40.
11. Prediger RD, Pamplona FA, Fernandes D, Takahashi RN. Caffeine improves spatial learning deficits in an animal model of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) -- the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR). Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2005;8(4):583-94. doi: 10.1017/S1461145705005341
12. Bobbin RP. Caffeine and ryanodine demonstrate a role for the ryanodine receptor in the organ of Corti. Hear Res. 2002;174(1-2):172-82. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5955(02)00654-8
13. Soleimanian S, Farahani S, Adel Ghahraman M, Kebriaiezadeh A, Faghihzadeh S. [Effects of caffeine on auditory brainstem response]. Audiol. 2008;17(1):45-52. Persian.
14. Dixit A, Vaney N, Tandon OP. Effect of caffeine on central auditory pathways: an evoked potential study. Hear Res. 2006;220(1-2):61-6. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2006.06.017
15. Pan J, Takeshita T, Morimoto K. Acute caffeine effect on repeatedly measured P300. Environ Health Prev Med. 2000;5(1):13-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02935910
16. Barry RJ, Johnstone SJ, Clarke AR, Rushby JA, Brown CR, McKenzie DN. Caffeine effects on ERPs and performance in an auditory Go/NoGo task. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007;118(12):2692-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.08.023
17. Tavanai E, Farahani S, Adel-Ghahraman M, Jalaie S, Kouti L, Shidfar F. Effects of caffeine on cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential: a pilot study. Aud Vest Res. 2015;24(1):3-10.
18. Anderson S, Kraus N. Sensory-cognitive interaction in the neural encoding of speech in noise: a review. J Am Acad Audiol. 2010;21(9):575-85. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.21.9.3
19. Harkrider AW, Tampas JW. Differences in responses from the cochleae and central nervous systems of females with low versus high acceptable noise levels. J Am Acad Audiol. 2006;17(9):667-76. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17.9.6
20. Nabelek AK, Freyaldenhoven MC, Tampas JW, Burchfiel SB, Muenchen RA. Acceptable noise level as a predictor of hearing aid use. J Am Acad Audiol. 2006;17(9):626-39. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17.9.2
21. Freyaldenhoven MC, Nabelek AK, Burchfield SB, Thelin JW. Acceptable noise level as a measure of directional hearing aid benefit. J Am Acad Audiol. 2005;16(4):228-36. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16.4.4
22. Ahmadi A, Fatahi J, Keshani A, Jalilvand H, Modarresi Y, Jalaie S. [Developing and evaluating the reliability of acceptable noise level test in Persian language]. J Rehab Med. 2015;4(2):109-17. Persian.
23. Ghisolfi ES, Schuch A, Strimitzer IM Jr, Luersen G, Martins FF, Ramos FL, et al. Caffeine modulates P50 auditory sensory gating in healthy subjects. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2006;16(3):204-10. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2005.09.001
24. Pasman WJ, van Baak MA, Jeukendrup AE, de Haan A. The effect of different dosages of caffeine on endurance performance time. Int J Sports Med. 1995;16(4):225-30. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-972996
25. de Carvalho M, Marcelino E, de Mendonça A. Electrophysiological studies in healthy subjects involving caffeine. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;20 Suppl 1:S63-9. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2010-1377
26. Taghavi SMR, Geshani A, Rouhbakhsh N, Habibzadeh Mardani S. Acceptable noise level test: bases and theories. Aud Vest Res. 2017;26(4):184-94.
27. Carman AJ, Dacks PA, Lane RF, Shineman DW, Fillit HM. Current evidence for the use of coffee and caffeine to prevent age-related cognitive decline and Alzheimer's disease. J Nutr Health Aging. 2014;18(4):383-92. doi: 10.1007/s12603-014-0021-7
28. Freyaldenhoven MC, Thelin JW, Plyler PN, Nabelek AK, Burchfield SB. Effect of stimulant medication on the acceptance of background noise in individuals with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Audiol. 2005;16(9):677-86. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16.9.5
29. Nabelek AK, Tucker FM, Letowski TR. Toleration of background noises: relationship with patterns of hearing aid use by elderly persons. J Speech Hear Res. 1991;34(3):679-85. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3403.679
30. Gordon-Hickey S, Moore RE. Acceptance of noise with intelligible, reversed, and unfamiliar primary discourse. Am J Audiol. 2008;17(2):129-35. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2008/06-0018)
Copyright and Conflict of Interest
All submitted manuscripts should be accompanied with a statement from the author, showing there is no conflict of interest regarding that article. A conflict of interest, here, is a situation in which a medical research scientist, has competing professional or personal interests that make it difficult to fulfill his duties fairly. A conflict of interest can exist even if no unethical or improper act results from it, and can create an appearance of impropriety that can undermine confidence in the person or profession.
The right is reserved for the journal to accept or reject the submitted article or incorporate any changes deemed necessary by the editorial board to make contributions harmonize the editorial standards of the journal.
Accepted papers become the permanent property of Auditory and Vestibular Research.
The act of submitting a manuscript to the journal carries with it the right to publish that paper and implies the transfer of the copyright from the author to the Publisher.