Determining the quality of life in the elderly with high frequency hearing loss before and after hearing aid fitting
AbstractBackground and Aim: Hearing loss is a social damage affecting the most important aspect of social life i.e. communication. People with high frequency hearing loss do not accept hearing aid easily and resist its using. The purpose of this study was to determine the role of hearing aid in the quality of life of the elderly people with high frequency hearing loss.Methods: This study was performed on 22 elderly people over 60 years old with mild to moderate sensory neural high frequency hearing loss living in Hamadan City, Iran. Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (HHIE) questionnaire was completed before and three month after using hearing aid. Social, emotional, and total scores before and after intervention were compared, too.Results: Findings showed significant improvement of social, emotional and total scores before and three months after using hearing aid (p<0.001). Comparison of mean scores showed that prescribing hearing aid was effective in improving the quality of life in the elderly with high frequency hearing loss.Conclusion: Considering beneficial effects of hearing aid on improving the quality of life in elderly patients with high frequency hearing loss, applying appropriate hearing aid and if needed rehabilitation programs are recommended.
2. Monzani D, Galeazzi GM, Genovese E, Marrara A, Martini A. Psychological profile and social behaviour of working adults with mild or moderate hearing loss. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2008;28(2):61-6.
3. Bogardus ST Jr, Yueh B, Shekelle PG. Screening and management of adult hearing loss in primary care: clinical applications. JAMA. 2003;289(15):1986-90. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.15.1986
4. Betlejewski S. [Age connected hearing disorders (presbyacusis) as a social problem]. Otolaryngol Pol. 2006;60(6):883-6. Polish.
5. Rashedi V, Gharib M, Yazdani AA. Social participation and mental health among older adults in Iran. Iranian Rehabilitation Journal. 2014;12(1):9-13.
6. Yueh B, Shapiro N, MacLean CH, Shekelle PG. Screening and management of adult hearing loss in primary care: scientific review. JAMA. 2003;289(15):1976-85. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.15.1976
7. Gratton MA, Vázquez AE. Age-related hearing loss: current research. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;11(5):367-71.
8. Frisina DR, Frisina RD. Speech recognition in noise and presbycusis: relations to possible neural mechanisms. Hear Res. 1997;106(1-2):95-104. doi: /10.1016/S0378-5955(97)00006-3
9. Yamasoba T, Lin FR, Someya S, Kashio A, Sakamoto T, Kondo K. Current concepts in age-related hearing loss: epidemiology and mechanistic pathways. Hear Res. 2013;303:30-8. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.01.021
10. Wong AC, Ryan AF. Mechanisms of sensorineural cell damage, death and survival in the cochlea. Front Aging Neurosci. 2015;7:58. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00058
11. Chia E, Mitchell P, Smith W, Rochtchina E, Wang J. Visual impairment and health-related quality of life: the blue mountains eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44(13):984.
12. Kochkin S. MarkeTrak VIII patients report improved quality of life with hearing aid usage. Hear J. 2011;64(6):25-26,28,30,32. doi: 10.1097/01.HJ.0000399150.30374.45
13. Fabry D. Facts vs myths: the" skinny" on slim-tube open fittings. Hearing Review. 2006;13(5):20.
14. Mondelli MF, Souza PJ. Quality of life in elderly adults before and after hearing aid fitting. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;78(3):49-56. doi: /10.1590/S1808-86942012000300010
15. Dalton DS, Cruickshanks KJ, Klein BE, Klein R, Wiley TL, Nondahl DM. The impact of hearing loss on quality of life in older adults. Gerontologist. 2003;43(5):661-8. doi: /10.1093/geront/43.5.661
16. Chisolm TH, Johnson CE, Danhauer JL, Portz LJ, Abrams HB, Lesner S, et al. A systematic review of health-related quality of life and hearing aids: final report of the American Academy of Audiology Task Force On the Health-Related Quality of Life Benefits of Amplification in Adults. J Am Acad Audiol. 2007;18(2):151-83. doi: /10.3766/jaaa.18.2.7
17. Chao TK, Chen TH. Cost-effectiveness of hearing aids in the hearing-impaired elderly: a probabilistic approach. Otol Neurotol. 2008;29(6):776-83. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31817e5d1b
18. Maeda Y, Sugaya A, Nagayasu R, Nakagawa A, Nishizaki K. Subjective hearing-related quality-of-life is a major factor in the decision to continue using hearing aids among older persons. Acta Otolaryngol. 2016;136(9):919-22. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2016.1183817
19. McArdle R, Chisolm TH, Abrams HB, Wilson RH, Doyle PJ. The WHO-DAS II: measuring outcomes of hearing aid intervention for adults. Trends Amplif. 2005;9(3):127-43. doi: 10.1177/108471380500900304
Copyright and Conflict of Interest
All submitted manuscripts should be accompanied with a statement from the author, showing there is no conflict of interest regarding that article. A conflict of interest, here, is a situation in which a medical research scientist, has competing professional or personal interests that make it difficult to fulfill his duties fairly. A conflict of interest can exist even if no unethical or improper act results from it, and can create an appearance of impropriety that can undermine confidence in the person or profession.
The right is reserved for the journal to accept or reject the submitted article or incorporate any changes deemed necessary by the editorial board to make contributions harmonize the editorial standards of the journal.
Accepted papers become the permanent property of Auditory and Vestibular Research.
The act of submitting a manuscript to the journal carries with it the right to publish that paper and implies the transfer of the copyright from the author to the Publisher.