Development and assessment of validity and reliability of the Persian version of vestibular rehabilitation benefit questionnaire

  • Abdollah Moossavi Department of Otolaryngology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Saeideh Mehrkian Department of Audiology, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Farzad Hamzehpour Department of Audiology, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Enayatollah Bakhshi Department of Biostatistics, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Keywords: Vestibular rehabilitation, validity, reliability, vertigo, dizziness

Abstract

Background and Aim: Assessment of vestibular rehabilitation outcomes is a necessary step in this process. Assessment by clinical devices can reveal and measure some aspects of intervention but cannot show its effects on the patient quality of life. Vestibular rehabilitation benefit questionnaire is a scale for evaluating the effects of vestibular deficits on the quality of life and psychological aspects more efficiently than similar questionnaires. This research studied preparation and assessment of validity and reliability of Persian version of this questionnaire.Methods: The translation process was based on International Quality Of Life Assessment protocol with considering cultural adaptation. Face validity and content validity, including content validity ratio and content validity index (CVI) were evaluated and test-retest reliability and Cronbach alpha was measured for reliability assessment of 108 vestibular deficit patients who received vestibular rehabilitation interventions. Furthermore, dizziness handicap inventory was used to evaluate correlation between vestibular rehabilitation benefit questionnaire and dizziness handicap inventory results.Results: Questions with imperfections were modified. CVI in Lawshe method was equal to 1 indicating the necessity of inserting some questions in the questionnaire. Intraclass correlation was 0.94 for the test-retest reliability and the Cronbach alpha was 0.68, i.e. Persian vestibular rehabilitation benefit questionnaire has good reliability. In addition, the Spearman correlation coefficient was 0.74, indicating a good correlation between two questionnaire scores.Conclusion: Persian version of vestibular rehabilitation benefit questionnaire is as reliable and valid as its original version and can be used for patients with vestibular deficits under vestibular rehabilitation treatment.

References

1. Agrawal Y, Carey JP, Della Santina CC, Schubert MC, Minor LB. Disorders of balance and vestibular function in US adults: data from the national health and nutrition examination survey, 2001-2004. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(10):938-44. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.66
2. Morris AE, Lutman ME, Yardley L. Measuring outcome from vestibular rehabilitation, part I: qualitative development of a new self-report measure. Int J Audiol. 2008;47(4):169-77. doi: 10.1080/14992020701843129
3. Booth RL. Dizziness and quality of life in clinic and general population samples of dizzy individuals. [Dissertation]. Southampton, UK: University of Southampton; 2000.
4. Lynn SG, Driscoll CL, Harner SG, Beatty CW, Atkinson EJ. Assessment of dysequilibrium after acoustic neuroma removal. Am J Otol. 1999;20(4):484-94.
5. Jacobson GP, Newman CW. The development of the dizziness handicap inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990;116(4):424-7.
6. Cohen HS, Kimball KT. Development of the vestibular disorders activities of daily living scale. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126(7):881-7.
7. Cohen HS, Kimball KT. Increased independence and decreased vertigo after vestibular rehabilitation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;128(1):60-70. doi: 10.1067/mhn.2003.23
8. Honrubia V, Bell TS, Harris MR, Baloh RW, Fisher LM. Quantitative evaluation of dizziness characteristics and impact on quality of life. Am J Otol. 1996;17(4):595-602.
9. Morris AE, Lutman ME, Yardley L. Measuring outcome from vestibular rehabilitation, part II: refinement and validation of a new self-report measure. Int J Audiol. 2009;48(1):24-37. doi: 10.1080/14992020802314905
10. Aaronson NK, Acquadro C, Alonso J, Apolone G, Bucquet D, Bullinger M, et al. International quality of life assessment (IQOLA) project. Qual Life Res. 1992;1(5):349-51.
11. Jafarzadeh S, Bahrami E, Pourbakht A, Jalaie S, Daneshi A. Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the dizziness handicap inventory. J Res Med Sci. 2014; 19(8): 769-75.
12. Mehrkian S, Erfanimanesh Z, Bakhshi E. Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the vestibular disorders activities of daily living scale. Aud Vest Res. 2018;27(1):25-30.
13. Deveze A, Bernard-Demanze L, Xavier F, Lavieille JP, Elziere M. Vestibular compensation and vestibular rehabilitation. Current concepts and new trends. Neurophysiol Clin. 2014;44(1):49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2013.10.138
Published
2018-04-25
How to Cite
1.
Moossavi A, Mehrkian S, Hamzehpour F, Bakhshi E. Development and assessment of validity and reliability of the Persian version of vestibular rehabilitation benefit questionnaire. AVR. 27(2):65-1.
Section
Research Article(s)