Hearing aid-related satisfaction based on type and degree of hearing loss in elderly

  • Farzad Faraji Khiavi Department of Health Services Administration, School of Health, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
  • Arash Bayat Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Center, School of Rehabilitation, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
  • Rezvan Dashti Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Center, School of Rehabilitation, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
  • Seyed Jalal Sameni Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Keywords: Satisfaction, hearing aid, elderly, hearing loss

Abstract

Background and Aim: Hearing loss is one of the most prevalent chronic diseases in the elderly; using a hearing aid to alleviate auditory impairment can positively affect their quality of life. This research aimed to determine the level of satisfaction concerning hearing aids in elderly people with hearing impairment based on the type and degree of hearing loss.
Methods: An analytic cross-sectional research design was used; the sample included 40 elderly people who used hearing aids. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) age classification, participants were divided into two age groups: 65-74 years (n=20) and 75-90 years (n=20). Satisfaction levels were assessed using a standard satisfaction with amplification in daily life (SADL) questionnaire.
Results: Satisfaction levels in the 65-74 age group were significantly higher than that in the 75-90 age
group (p=0.02). Participants with mixed hearing loss revealed higher satisfaction levels than
participants with sensorineural hearing loss (p=0.02). On the negative effects dimension, participants with severe hearing loss exhibited significantly higher satisfaction levels than participants with moderate or moderate to severe hearing loss (p=0.01).
Conclusion: Total satisfaction mean scores were relatively high in the elderly participants. Negative features could be reduced via careful consultation regarding the aids’ amplifying capabilities and limitations in groups with moderate or moderate to severe hearing loss.

References

1. Lee TW, Ko IS, Lee KJ. Health promotion behaviors and quality of life among community-dwelling elderly in Korea: a cross-sectional survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006;43(3):293-300.
2. Sprinzl GM, Riechelmann H. Current trends in treating hearing loss in elderly people: a review of the technology and treatment options - a mini-review. Gerontology. 2010;56(3):351-8.
3. Sindhusake D, Mitchell P, Smith W, Golding M, Newall P, Hartley D, et al. Validation of self- reported hearing loss. The blue mountains hearing study. Int J Epidemiol. 2001;30(6):1371-8.
4. Dalton DS, Cruickshanks KJ, Klein BE, Klein R, Wiley TL, Nondahl DM. The impact of hearing loss on quality of life in older adults. Gerontologist. 2003;43(5):661-8.
5. Silva DP, Silva VB, Aurélio FS. Auditory satisfaction of patient fitted with hearing aids in the Brazilian public health service and benefits offered by the hearing aids. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;79(5):538-45.
6. Newman W, Sandridge SA. Hearing loss is often undiscovered, but screening is easy. Cleve Clin J Med. 2004;71(3):225-32.
7. Appollonio I, Carabellese C, Frattola L, Trabucchi M. Effects of sensory aids on the quality of life and mortality of elderly people: a multivariate analysis. Age Ageing. 1996;25(2):89-96.
8. Mazaher Yazdi M, Lotfi Y, Malayeri S, Jafari Z. Auditory perception test for mild to profound hearing-impaired individuals (5-20 years) in baghche-ban deaf school in karaj (2002). RJMS. 2004;10(38):943-9.
9. Kochkin S. MarkeTrak VII: Customer satisfaction with hearing instruments in the digital age. Hear J. 2005;58(9):30,32-34,38-40,42-43.
10. Uriarte M, Denzin L, Dunstan A, Sellars J, Hickson L. Measuring hearing aid outcomes using the satisfaction with amplification in daily life (SADL) questionnaire: Australian data. J Am Acad Audiol. 2005;16(6):383-402.
11. Cox RM, Alexander GC. Measuring satisfaction with amplification in daily life: the SADL scale. Ear Hear. 1999;20(4):360-20.
12. Veiga LR, Merlo AR, Menque SS. Satisfaction level with hearing aid in the daily life of army healthcare system users. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2005;71(1):67-73.
13. Salonen J, Johansson R, Karjalainen S, Vahlberg T, Jero JP, Isoaho R. Hearing aid compliance in the elderly. B-ENT. 2013;9(1):23-8.
14. Kochkin S. MarkeTrak V. On the issue of value: hearing aid benefit, satisfaction and repurchase rates. Hear Rev. 2003;10(2):12-26.
15. Dell' Antônia SF, Ikino CM, Carreirão Filho W. Degree of satisfaction of patients fitted with hearing aids at a high complexity service. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;79(5):555-63.
16. Lessa AH, Costa MJ, Becker KT, Vaucher AVA. Satisfaction of hearing aid users with hearing loss of severe and deep degree. Arquivos Int. Otorrinolaringol. (Impr.) [online]. 2010;14(3):338-45.
17. Carvalho JSA. Satisfaction of the elderly with hearing aid provided in Tocantins state- Brazil. Intl Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007;11(4):416-26.
Published
2017-07-31
How to Cite
1.
Faraji Khiavi F, Bayat A, Dashti R, Sameni SJ. Hearing aid-related satisfaction based on type and degree of hearing loss in elderly. Aud Vestib Res. 23(6):114-122.
Section
Research Article(s)