The effects of bilingualism on auditory memory using Persian version of dichotic auditory-verbal memory test
AbstractBackground and Aim: Today, Bilingualism is a developing phenomenon which half of the world population is bilingual. Auditory system is the main route to language learning, so it is expected that bilingualism has an effect on functions of the auditory system. Auditory memory is one of the auditory processes which is a cornerstone of linguistic skills and learning process growth, so that, it has an important role in language learning. In this paper, functions of the auditory memory in monolinguals and precocious bilinguals have been investigated through dichotic auditory-verbal memory test.Methods: A cross sectional-contrastive study of the Persian version of dichotic auditory-verbal memory test has been carried out among 30 monolingual and 30 bilingual persons. The participants were chosen from both sexes in the age range of 18-30, and test scores have been compared in both groups and sexes.Results: Mean score of dichotic auditory-verbal memory test in monolinguals was 5.47 (from 10), with a standard deviant of 0.55, and in bilinguals were 7.52, with a standard deviant of 0.90, which statistically, it showed a significant difference in scores between the two groups (p<0.001). There was no significant difference among men and women’s scores in monolingual (p=0.06) and bilingual (p=0.10) groups.Conclusion: Results of this limited research showed that there was a considerable functional difference between monolinguals and bilinguals in dichotic auditory-verbal memory test. Therefore, it seems precocious bilingualism has a positive effect on the auditory memory.
2. Steinberg DD, Sciarini NV. An introduction to psycholinguistics. 2nd ed. New York: Taylor & Francis; 2006.
3. Rogers CL, Lister JJ, Febo DM, Besing JM, Abrams HB. Effects of bilingualism, noise, and reverberation on speech perception by listeners with normal hearing. Applied Psycholinguistics. 2006; 27(3):465-85.
4. Onoda RM, Pereira LD, Guilherme A. Temporal processing and dichotic listening in bilingual and non-bilingual descendants. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;72(6):737-46.
5. Ressel V, Pallier C, Venturas-Campos N, Díaz B, Roessler A, Ávila C, et al. An effect of bilingualism on the auditory cortex. J Neurosci. 2012;32(47):16597-601.
6. Francis WS, Gutiérrez M. Bilingual recognition memory: stronger performance but weaker levels-of-processing effects in the less fluent language. Mem Cognit. 2012;40(3):496-503.
7. Cusimano A. Learning disabilities: there is a cure--a guide for parents, educators and physicians. 1st ed. Lansdale, PA: Achieve Publications; 2002.
8. Parsaie S, Kiani S, Azad Farsani Y. Comparison between working memory and academic performance in bilingual and monolingual boy students. Journal of Psychology. 2013;17(1):104-19. Persian.
9. Schroeder SR, Marian V. A bilingual advantage for episodic memory in older adults. J Cogn Psychol (Hove). 2012;24(5):591-601.
10. Yoo J, Kaushanskaya M. Phonological memory in bilinguals and monolinguals. Mem Cognit. 2012;40(8):1314-30.
11. Krizman J, Marian V, Shook A, Skoe E, Kraus N. Subcortical encoding of sound is enhanced in bilinguals and relates to executive function advantages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(20):7877-81.
12. Bak TH, Vega-Mendoza M, Sorace S. Never too late? An advantage on tests of auditory attention extends to late bilinguals. Front Psychol. 2014;5:485.
13. Jalilvand-Karimi L, Motlaghzadeh L, Mohammadkhani Gh, Akbarzadeh Baghban A. The comparison of auditory capacity between bilinguals and monolinguals by consonant-vowel dichotic test. J Rehab Med. 2013;2(3):19-30. Persian.
14. Aghamollaei M, Tahaei SA, Jafari Z, Toufan R, Keyhani MR. Development and evaluation of the Persian version of the dichotic auditory-verbal memory test in 18-to 25-year old normal individuals. Audiol. 2011;20(2).86-94. Persian.
15. Chun MM, Turk-Browne NB. The cognitive benefits of being bilingual. Cerebrum. 2012:13.
16. Chun MM, Turk-Browne NB. Interactions between attention and memory. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2007;17(2):177-84.
17. Smith EE, Jonides J. Storage and executive processes in the frontal lobes. Science. 1999;283(5408):1657-61.
18. Goldstein JM, Jerram M, Poldrack R, Anagnoson R, Breiter HC, Makris N. Sex differences in prefrontal cortical brain activity during fMRI of audiology verbal working memory. Neuropsychology. 2005;19(4):509-19.
19. Hugdahl K, Asbjørnsen A, Wester K. Memory performance in Parkinson's disease. Cogn Behav Neurol. 1993;6(3):170-6.
20. Aghamolaie M, Jafari Z, Tahaie SAA, Toufan R, Keyhani MR. The effect of gender on the results of the Persian version of dichotic auditory-verbal memory test. Advances in Cognitive Science. 2010;12(1):70-6. Persian.
Copyright and Conflict of Interest
All submitted manuscripts should be accompanied with a statement from the author, showing there is no conflict of interest regarding that article. A conflict of interest, here, is a situation in which a medical research scientist, has competing professional or personal interests that make it difficult to fulfill his duties fairly. A conflict of interest can exist even if no unethical or improper act results from it, and can create an appearance of impropriety that can undermine confidence in the person or profession.
The right is reserved for the journal to accept or reject the submitted article or incorporate any changes deemed necessary by the editorial board to make contributions harmonize the editorial standards of the journal.
Accepted papers become the permanent property of Auditory and Vestibular Research.
The act of submitting a manuscript to the journal carries with it the right to publish that paper and implies the transfer of the copyright from the author to the Publisher.