Free and focused attention in young and aged listeners using randomized dichotic digits test

  • Fatemeh Heiran Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Mohammad Ebrahim Mahdavi Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Fatemeh Heidari Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban Department of Basic Sciences, School of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Mohammad Mehdi Heiran Department of Emergency Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
Keywords: Free attention, focused attention, randomized dichotic digits test, dichotic listening, elderly

Abstract

Background and Aim: Aging is associated with reduced cognitive abilities including attention and memory. There is some evidence that shows randomized dichotic digits test (RDDT) has enough difficulty to show the ear asymmetry in dichotic listening. This study aimed to compare the effect of free and focused attention on dichotic listening ability of young and elderly listeners.Methods: The cross-sectional comparative study was performed on fifty right-handed young (18-25 years old) and fifty right-handed aged (60-80 years old) individuals with equal gender ratio. Recognition performance of right and left ears were compared in free and focused attention conditions.Results: In the free attention condition, mean percent correct of right and left ears of aged group (83.1 and 61.5 respectively) was significantly lower than the scores of the young group (92.8 and 84.3 respectively with p<0.001). In focused attention to right, there was no statistically significant difference between mean of performance of the two age groups (p=0.407); however, aged group obtained significantly lower mean score in focused attention to left ear (p<0.05).Conclusion: Random presentation of one-, two- and three-pair of dichotic digits resulted in diminished performance of both ear of aged group in free attention and left ear performance in focused attention conditions. Lower score of aged group in randomized dichotic digits test can be better explained by combinatory (structural and attentional) model of dichotic listening.

References

1. Strouse A, Wilson RH. Recognition of one-, two-, and three-pair dichotic digits under free and directed recall. J Am Acad Audiol. 1999;10(10):557-71.
2. Hommet C, Mondon K, Berrut G, Gouyer Y, Isingrini M, Constans T, et al. Central auditory processing in aging: the dichotic listening paradigm. J Nutr Health Aging. 2010;14(9):751-6.
3. Strouse A, Wilson RH, Brush N. Effect of order bias on the recognition of dichotic digits in young and elderly listeners. Audiology. 2000;39(2):93-101.
4. Andersson M, Reinvang I, Wehling E, Hugdahl K, Lundervold AJ. A dichotic listening study of attention control in older adults. Scand J Psychol. 2008;49(4):299-304.
5. Foundas AL, Corey DM, Hurley MM, Heilman KM. Verbal dichotic listening in right and left-handed adults: laterality effects of directed attention. Cortex. 2006;42(1):79-86.
6. Musiek FE, Weihing J. Perspectives on dichotic listening and the corpus callosum. Brain Cogn. 2011;76(2):225-32.
7. Kam AC, Keith RW. Aging effect on dichotic listening of Cantonese. Int J Audiol. 2010;49(9):651-6.
8. Moncrieff DW, Wilson RH. Recognition of randomly presented one-, two-, and three-pair dichotic digits by children and young adults. J Am Acad Audiol. 2009;20(1):58-70.
9. Gadea M, Espert R. A comparison of the effects for sustained versus shifted attention on dichotic listening performance. Laterality. 2009;14(3):315-28.
10. Strouse A, Wilson RH. Stimulus length uncertainty with dichotic digit recognition. J Am Acad Audiol. 1999;10(4):219-29.
11. Strouse A, Wilson RH, Brush N. Recognition of dichotic digits under pre-cued and post-cued response conditions in young and elderly listeners. Br J Audiol. 2000;34(3):141-51.
12. Carter AS, Wilson RH. The effect of filtering and inter-digit interval on the recognition of dichotic digits. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000;37(5):599-606.
13. Bouma A, Gootjes L. Effects of attention on dichotic listening in elderly and patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type. Brain Cogn. 2011;76(2):286-93.
14. Salthouse TA, Ferrer-Caja E. What needs to be explained to account for age-related effects on multiple cognitive variables? Psychol Aging. 2003;18(1):91-110.
15. Mahdavi ME, Aghazadeh J, Tahaei SAA, Heiran F, Akbarzadeh Baghban A. Persian randomized dichotic digits test: Development and dichotic listening performance in young adults. Audiol. 2015;23(6):99-113. Persian.
16. Takio F, Koivisto M, Jokiranta L, Rashid F, Kallio J, Tuominen T, et al. The effect of age on attentional modulation in dichotic listening. Dev Neuropsychol. 2009;34(3):225-39.
17. Studebaker GA. A "rationalized" arcsine transform. J Speech Hear Res. 1985;28(3):455-62.
18. Keith RW, Anderson J. Dichotic listening tests. In: Museik F, Chermak GD, editors. Handbook of (central) auditory processing disorder: auditory neuroscience and diagnosis, Volume 1.1st ed. San Diego: plural publishing; 2007. p. 207-30.
19. Jancke L, Shah NJ. Does dichotic listening probe temporal lobe functions? Neurology. 2002;58(5):736-43.
20. Jerger J, Martin J. Dichotic listening tests in the assessment of auditory processing disorders. Audiological Medicine. 2006;4(1):25-34.
21. Hugdahl K, Westerhausen R, Alho K, Medvedev S, Laine M, Hämäläinen H. Attention and cognitive control: unfolding the dichotic listening story. Scand J Psychol. 2009;50(1):11-22.
Published
2015-11-25
How to Cite
1.
Heiran F, Mahdavi ME, Heidari F, Akbarzadeh Baghban A, Heiran MM. Free and focused attention in young and aged listeners using randomized dichotic digits test. AVR. 24(4):186-92.
Section
Research Article(s)