Free and focused attention in young and aged listeners using randomized dichotic digits test
AbstractBackground and Aim: Aging is associated with reduced cognitive abilities including attention and memory. There is some evidence that shows randomized dichotic digits test (RDDT) has enough difficulty to show the ear asymmetry in dichotic listening. This study aimed to compare the effect of free and focused attention on dichotic listening ability of young and elderly listeners.Methods: The cross-sectional comparative study was performed on fifty right-handed young (18-25 years old) and fifty right-handed aged (60-80 years old) individuals with equal gender ratio. Recognition performance of right and left ears were compared in free and focused attention conditions.Results: In the free attention condition, mean percent correct of right and left ears of aged group (83.1 and 61.5 respectively) was significantly lower than the scores of the young group (92.8 and 84.3 respectively with p<0.001). In focused attention to right, there was no statistically significant difference between mean of performance of the two age groups (p=0.407); however, aged group obtained significantly lower mean score in focused attention to left ear (p<0.05).Conclusion: Random presentation of one-, two- and three-pair of dichotic digits resulted in diminished performance of both ear of aged group in free attention and left ear performance in focused attention conditions. Lower score of aged group in randomized dichotic digits test can be better explained by combinatory (structural and attentional) model of dichotic listening.
2. Hommet C, Mondon K, Berrut G, Gouyer Y, Isingrini M, Constans T, et al. Central auditory processing in aging: the dichotic listening paradigm. J Nutr Health Aging. 2010;14(9):751-6.
3. Strouse A, Wilson RH, Brush N. Effect of order bias on the recognition of dichotic digits in young and elderly listeners. Audiology. 2000;39(2):93-101.
4. Andersson M, Reinvang I, Wehling E, Hugdahl K, Lundervold AJ. A dichotic listening study of attention control in older adults. Scand J Psychol. 2008;49(4):299-304.
5. Foundas AL, Corey DM, Hurley MM, Heilman KM. Verbal dichotic listening in right and left-handed adults: laterality effects of directed attention. Cortex. 2006;42(1):79-86.
6. Musiek FE, Weihing J. Perspectives on dichotic listening and the corpus callosum. Brain Cogn. 2011;76(2):225-32.
7. Kam AC, Keith RW. Aging effect on dichotic listening of Cantonese. Int J Audiol. 2010;49(9):651-6.
8. Moncrieff DW, Wilson RH. Recognition of randomly presented one-, two-, and three-pair dichotic digits by children and young adults. J Am Acad Audiol. 2009;20(1):58-70.
9. Gadea M, Espert R. A comparison of the effects for sustained versus shifted attention on dichotic listening performance. Laterality. 2009;14(3):315-28.
10. Strouse A, Wilson RH. Stimulus length uncertainty with dichotic digit recognition. J Am Acad Audiol. 1999;10(4):219-29.
11. Strouse A, Wilson RH, Brush N. Recognition of dichotic digits under pre-cued and post-cued response conditions in young and elderly listeners. Br J Audiol. 2000;34(3):141-51.
12. Carter AS, Wilson RH. The effect of filtering and inter-digit interval on the recognition of dichotic digits. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000;37(5):599-606.
13. Bouma A, Gootjes L. Effects of attention on dichotic listening in elderly and patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type. Brain Cogn. 2011;76(2):286-93.
14. Salthouse TA, Ferrer-Caja E. What needs to be explained to account for age-related effects on multiple cognitive variables? Psychol Aging. 2003;18(1):91-110.
15. Mahdavi ME, Aghazadeh J, Tahaei SAA, Heiran F, Akbarzadeh Baghban A. Persian randomized dichotic digits test: Development and dichotic listening performance in young adults. Audiol. 2015;23(6):99-113. Persian.
16. Takio F, Koivisto M, Jokiranta L, Rashid F, Kallio J, Tuominen T, et al. The effect of age on attentional modulation in dichotic listening. Dev Neuropsychol. 2009;34(3):225-39.
17. Studebaker GA. A "rationalized" arcsine transform. J Speech Hear Res. 1985;28(3):455-62.
18. Keith RW, Anderson J. Dichotic listening tests. In: Museik F, Chermak GD, editors. Handbook of (central) auditory processing disorder: auditory neuroscience and diagnosis, Volume 1.1st ed. San Diego: plural publishing; 2007. p. 207-30.
19. Jancke L, Shah NJ. Does dichotic listening probe temporal lobe functions? Neurology. 2002;58(5):736-43.
20. Jerger J, Martin J. Dichotic listening tests in the assessment of auditory processing disorders. Audiological Medicine. 2006;4(1):25-34.
21. Hugdahl K, Westerhausen R, Alho K, Medvedev S, Laine M, Hämäläinen H. Attention and cognitive control: unfolding the dichotic listening story. Scand J Psychol. 2009;50(1):11-22.
Copyright and Conflict of Interest
All submitted manuscripts should be accompanied with a statement from the author, showing there is no conflict of interest regarding that article. A conflict of interest, here, is a situation in which a medical research scientist, has competing professional or personal interests that make it difficult to fulfill his duties fairly. A conflict of interest can exist even if no unethical or improper act results from it, and can create an appearance of impropriety that can undermine confidence in the person or profession.
The right is reserved for the journal to accept or reject the submitted article or incorporate any changes deemed necessary by the editorial board to make contributions harmonize the editorial standards of the journal.
Accepted papers become the permanent property of Auditory and Vestibular Research.
The act of submitting a manuscript to the journal carries with it the right to publish that paper and implies the transfer of the copyright from the author to the Publisher.